Canada: Agricultural Law NetLetter - Sunday, June 7, 2015 - Issue 325


A Justice of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench has dismissed a farmer's application for judicial review from an Appeals Committee established by Agriculture Financial Services Corporation to consider appeals from farmers who suffer production losses insured under the federal-provincial AgriInsurance Program. The Court concluded, among other things, that the standard of review is reasonableness and that the Court could not re-weigh the evidence, but instead look at the record to decide if Appeal Committee's conclusions were within acceptable outcomes. The Court also upheld the Committee's finding that the farmer's failure to correct errors in "statement of reported production" prepared by AFSC in relation to a claim constituted a fraudulent, false or misleading statement which disentitled the farmer to recovery. (F. Prins Potatoes Ltd. v. Agriculture Financial Services Corp., CALN/2015-014, [2015] A.J. No. 578, Alberta Court of Queen's Bench)


F. Prins Potatoes Ltd. v. Agriculture Financial Services Corp.; CALN/2015-014, Full text: [2015] A.J. No. 578; 2015 ABQB 335, Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, B.E. Mahoney J., May 22, 2015.

Crop Insurance -- Judicial Review of Appeal Committee Decisions -- Standard of Review -- Fraudulent, False and Misleading Statements.

F. Prins Potatoes Ltd. ("Prins") brought an application for judicial review of a decision of Agriculture Financial Services Corporation Appeal Committee (the "Appeal Committee") following a hearing which was held on November 2, 2012. Prins entered into AgriInsurance contracts with Agriculture Financial Services Corporation ("AFSC") for the 2009 and 2010 crop years. The AgriInsurance Program is a federal-provincial government initiative that provides production insurance to Alberta agricultural producers who have suffered production losses due to perils designated in the insurance policy. The AgriInsurance Program is administered in Alberta by AFSC.

Prins made claims for losses alleged to have occurred in relation to its canola crops, spring wheat crops and its potatoe crops in 2009 and 2010.

AFSC initially delinced to pay benefits to Prins in relation to its claim because Prins' "Post Harvest Assessments" were incomplete and inconsistent with actual crop production.

Following discussions between Prins and AFSC, AFSC accepted Prins' claim for production losses with respect to its 2009 seed potatoes and its 2010 canola and seed potatoes.

On June 5, 2012, Prins appealed AFSC's denial of claim production losses with respect to its 2009 wheat and canola, and its 2010 wheat. Prins also appealed AFSC's calculation of the 2009 and 2010 potatoe crop loss claim.

The Appeal Committee issued its reasons on December 3 to 5, 2012. Credibility appeared to be the primary issue related to under-reported grain sales.

Prins filed an application for judicial review on June 3, 2013 but did not serve its application on any of the respondents until February 3, 2014.

Section 10(1) of the Agriculture Financial Services Act, RSA 2000, c. A-12 (the "Act") enables AFSC to establish an appeal committee to hear appeals with respect to crop loss matters. Section 7(1) of the Agriculture Financial Services Regulation, Alta. Reg 99/2002 (the "Regulation") states that a person who is a party to a contract with AFSC under the Act may appeal the decision of AFSC regarding issues of interpretation of insurance contracts and related documents as they relate to the rights and regulations of any parties to the contract.

Section 10(8) of the Act provides that decisions of the Appeal Committee are binding and final on the parties.

The issues before the Court were:

1. Whether Prins' appeal was barred by the provisions of the Alberta Rules of Court which require applications for judicial review to be served within 6 months of the date of a decision.

2. Whether Prins' Affidavit was admissible.

3. The standard of review.

4. Whether the Appeal Committee erred in dismissing Prins' appeal.

Decision: Mahoney, J. dismissed Prins' application [at para. 66].

Mahoney, J. considered the following issues:

1.Whether Prins' application for judicial review was barred because it was served outside the 6 month date of the Appeal Committee decision.

Mahoney, J. observed after reviewing the rules and the case law, that the 6 month limitation period could not be extended, that strict compliance was required, and that the application was out of time because it was served beyond the 6 month limitation period [at para. 16 to 22].

2.Whether Prins' Affidavit was admissible in an application for judicial review?

Mahoney, J. concluded that Prins Affidavit evidence was not admissible and that the material to be considered by the Court on judicial review is confined to the record of the proceedings before the tribunal in question, relying on Alberta Liquor Store Association v Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), 2006 ABQB 904 (CanLII) at paras 40-42 [at para. 23 to 27].

3.What was the appropriate standard of review?

After referring to Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v Alberta Teachers' Association, 2011 SCC 61 (CanLII); Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 (CanLII), Smith v Alliance Pipeline Ltd., 2001 SCC 7 (CanbLII) at para. 26; Nor-Man Regional Health Authority v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals, 2011 SCC 59 (CanLII) at para. 35 and Sattva Capital Corp. v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 53 (CanLII), Mahoney, J. concluded [at para. 34] that the reasonableness standard applied, stating:

[34] The standard of reasonableness applies in this case. Interpreting the provisions of the AgriInsurance contract, the methods of paying or denying claims and the application of the law to the particular facts raises a question of mixed fact and law. Furthermore, the Committee was adjudicating within its home statute and within its own area of expertise."

Mahoney, J. added that:

- A Court should not disturb the findings of fact made by the Tribunal "if there was credible evidence upon which the trier could reasonably base his or her conclusion [at para. 35] citing: Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital v Koziol, 1977 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1978] 1 SCR 491 at 503-504 .

- In assessing whether the decision is unreasonable in light of the outcome and reasons, the Court should not substitute its own reasons but look instead at the record to decide if the conclusions are within acceptable outcomes [at para. 37] relying on Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses' Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62 (CanLII).

- The Court should not reweigh the evidence but instead look on whether the weighing done by the Tribunal was reasonable and whether all relevant evidence was considered in the fact finding process [at para. 38] relying on Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 CanLII 699, [199] 2 SCR 817.

4.Whether the Appeal Committee erred in dismissing Prins' appeal?

Prins had claimed indemnity with respect to 2009 and 2010 wheat claims. AFSC was of the view that Prins had breached both its contractual and common law duties by selling an insured crop and not reporting those sales to AFSC.

AFSC relied on the clause in the insurance contract regarding fraudulent, false or misleading statements, which states:

[40] Section FF of the Contract of Insurance refers to fraudulent, false or misleading statements. It states:

FF. Misrepresentation or Misconduct

I. If the Insured or the Insured's agent has made any fraudulent, false or misleading statement to AFSC, the Insured will not be entitled to any Indemnity for the Crop Year in which the fraudulent, false or misleading statement is made.

AFSC took the position that it did not have to prove fraud to deny an indemnity claim - only that Prins was not honest or forthcoming when interacting with AFSC.

Mahoney, J., after reviewing the evidence, commented at para. 49:

[49] To summarize, if you are an insured farmer participating in the ArgiInsurance program, every year you must to fill out an [Harvest Product Report]. When filling out the [Harvest Product Report], the insured farmer must state that he or she has accurately recorded all the production that was sold. The farmer then gets a [Statement of Reported Production] from the AFSC, which he or she then has an opportunity to review. Farmers must inform the AFSC of any inaccuracies in the [Statement of Reported Production].

Prins had given no indication that the information in the statements of reported production were incomplete or inaccurate in any way. A subsequent discrepancy lead to an audit which revealed a number of inaccuracies and the conclusion that a significant amount of production was not reported which should have been reported.

Mahoney, J. concluded [at para. 58] that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of false or misleading reporting.

Prins contested AFSC's measurement of the acreages seeded to potatoes with respect to its 2009 and 2010 seed potatoe claims.

Mahoney, J. observed [at para. 60] that the AgriInsurance Contract sets out procedures to measure insured acres and that the Appeal Committee's finding that Prins had failed to establish that the field measurements were not unreasonable, or unreliable. To the contrary, the Appeal Committee concluded that the evidence showed that AFSC's measurements were reasonable and reliable.

Mahoney, J. also concluded [at para. 62] that AFSC was not required to pay insurance claims based on sales but, rather, based on post-harvest assessments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions