Duty Of Fairness Extends To Performance File For Government Employee

NR
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Contributor

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP logo
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. The firm has more than 4,000 lawyers and other legal staff based in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East.
A recent decision of the Federal Court has affirmed the importance of a Federal government employee's right to procedural fairness.
Canada Employment and HR

A recent decision of the Federal Court has affirmed the importance of a Federal government employee's right to procedural fairness.

The dispute centred around whether an employee, in appealing his annual performance review, was entitled to see documents explaining his appraisal. The employer, a federal agenct, utilized what is often referred to as a "pay-at-risk" performance rating system. Under this system, an employee's performance rating is used to determine the amount of their annual bonus, or "performance award".

Upon receiving a negative performance rating, the employee appealed to his direct supervisor and then to the Assistant Deputy Minister. Both appeals were dismissed. It was only after filing a request for disclosure of documents pursuant to the Access to Information Act that the employee discovered that he had not been given access to a critical document. The document, which the Assistant Deputy Minister had relied upon in making her decision, outlined the employer's reasons for granting the negative rating.

The issue before the Federal Court was whether the employee had been given sufficient procedural fairness during his appeal. The factors for determining the level of procedural fairness required (outlined by the Supreme Court in Baker), include the importance of the decision to the individual. On this matter, the Federal Court held that:

"...[the] performance rating carried significant financial implications for the Applicant and cannot be casually dismissed as a mere "administrative decision", as suggested by the Respondent." (at para 35)

Ultimately, the Federal Court found the employee's right to procedural fairness had been breached and ordered the matter to be re-determined.

This article was written with the assistance of Erika Anschuetz , summer student.

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members ('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More