Canada: Dunkin' Donuts

The Quebec Court of Appeal's decision in Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd. v. Bertico et al.1 is of tremendous importance, as it undertakes an in-depth and thorough examination of the rights and obligations of the parties to a franchise agreement.

The judgment is the culmination of a decade-long court battle that Langlois Kronström Desjardins and Fasken Martineau waged on behalf of 32 Dunkin Donuts franchisees.

The franchisee plaintiffs suffered a steady and progressive deterioration of their operating results during the 1990s, to the point where, without vigorous intervention, their outlets seemed doomed to disappear altogether. They naturally turned to their franchisor for assistance and support. But despite numerous discussions, the franchisees did not receive the assistance and support to which they felt they were entitled from the franchisor. They concluded that Dunkin' Donuts had effectively abandoned them by not performing its contractual obligations, and they therefore instituted legal proceedings against it in 2003.

After a 71-day trial, the Superior Court allowed their action and ordered Dunkin' Donuts to pay the franchisees more than $16 million in damages.2

On appeal, the trial judgment was upheld with respect to the judge's interpretation of the contract and his finding of liability on the part of Dunkin' Donuts, but partially revised by reducing the damages award to slightly more than $10 million in order to correct certain calculation errors and reimburse the franchisor for unpaid royalties.

While the appeal judgment deals with several important issues, our analysis will be limited to the obligational content of the franchise agreement. In other words, what are the rights and obligations of the parties to such an agreement, namely the franchisor and the franchisees?

The franchisor argued on appeal that the trial judge had interpreted its obligation in the agreement "to protect and enhance the brand" as entailing the duty to "outperform the competition", which in this case was essentially Tim Hortons. Ultimately, it argued that the obligation imposed on it by the Superior Court was one of result.

The Court of Appeal rejected that argument. It pointed out that the franchisor was impugning the trial judge's interpretation of the agreement, which was a question of fact or of mixed fact and law, in respect of which the Court of Appeal can only intervene if a palpable and overriding error is shown to have been made.

Justice Kasirer, writing on behalf of the unanimous Court, found that such a showing had not been made and, moreover, that the appellant had incorrectly interpreted the decision of the Superior Court, rendered by Justice Tingley. He had expressed the view that in addition to the obligations expressly stipulated in the agreement, the franchisor had implied obligations, due to the nature of a franchise agreement, one of the characteristics of which is that it is performed over a long period of time. In such a context, the franchisor and its franchisees have a collaborative relationship involving rights and obligations spanning the entire term of their contractual relationship, despite the fact that their interests may occasionally diverge.

Justice Kasirer pointed out that protecting the Dunkin' Donuts brand was too important for the franchisor not to take an active part in the operation of the business. The successful operation of this chain of fast-food outlets required an ongoing interaction between the franchisor and each of its franchisees, in which the franchisor played a role by:  

  • choosing each new franchisee, whether it was opening a new outlet or acquiring one that was already operating;
  • providing new franchisees with assistance, support and adequate training;
  • continuing to provide technical and commercial assistance throughout the contractual relationship and ensuring that the standards on which the group's reputation was based were maintained on an ongoing basis, which in certain cases can require sanctioning underperforming franchisees.

Justice Kasirer concluded on this note by stating: "This would continue over the life of the agreement. In this sense, the agreement was a "relational" one which, as is often the case in such long-term arrangements, did not spell out all of its terms."3

The Court went on to emphasize the obligation of good faith inherent in all contractual relationships including, as the Court of Appeal had previously pointed out in the Provigo4 case, franchise agreements.

Finally, the Court dealt with the franchisor's implied obligation towards its entire network of franchisees. The Court acknowledged that this network is not, formally, a contracting party. But in its view the franchisor's duty to maintain the health and prosperity of the network is relevant to every individual contract and constitutes an implicit duty in each contract upon which a franchisee can take action in the event of a breach. The prosperity and success of a chain of fast-food outlets through the enforcement of recognized and stringent standards benefits all of the parties, franchisor and franchisees alike.

This implies, according to the Court, the obligation to take reasonable measures to support the franchisees as a group and counter the competition.

In this case the Court found that reliance on the franchisor was a key element of all the franchise agreements. The franchisor represented to each franchisee that its network and brand were valuable assets for the franchisee. Moreover, the preamble to the franchise agreement emphasized the value of the reputation of the brand and of the public's esteem for it, as well as the established renown of the network and the franchisor's track record in the fast-food business. This express contractual representation constituted an inducement to join the Dunkin' Donuts network.

The franchisees were thus naturally inclined to want to profit from these benefits as represented to them and had every reason to believe that Dunkin' Donuts would respect and enforce the contractual obligations ensuring that quality standards would be maintained throughout the entire term of their agreements: 

"The franchisee, naturally, relied on this in deciding to join the network. The franchisee signs the franchise agreement in order to profit from the established renown of the network, and he or she both understands and expects that this established track record will be maintained through a rigorous programme of imposed standards of quality and cleanliness, of training, of assistance and support. The opportunity to join the Dunkin' Donuts network, with its promised reputation for quality and uniform experience and the sense that the Franchisor would be present over the life of the agreement to ensure that quality, induces them to invest in the franchise." 

The Court essentially recognized that the franchise agreement implied that there would be an ongoing active business relationship between the franchisor and the franchisees that, despite occasional divergences or even conflicts of interest, would require coordination and collaboration in the conduct of the business and the continuous and ongoing obligation on the part of the franchisor to sustain and improve its network and brand. This obligation of support and assistance even extends to requiring the franchisor to sanction underperforming franchisees, when required to uphold quality standards. By the same token, the franchisee is involved in an ongoing operating system and must accordingly respect its obligations, which are the inevitable quid pro quo of its rights vis-à-vis the franchisor. This specific legal relationship is nothing new, as the Court of Appeal reaffirms in this decision, but the Court sheds important new light on that relationship. The clarity and scope of the Dunkin' Donuts judgment will no doubt make it a leading case in franchise law. 

This litigation was exceptional in scope and gave rise to considerable difficulties. The Superior Court recognized this by awarding $240,000 in special costs to law firms Langlois Kronström Desjardins and Fasken Martineau. This award was contested, but was upheld by the Court of Appeal.


1 2015 QCCA 624

2 2012 QCCS 2809

3 Emphasis added

4 Provigo Distribution v. Supermarché ARG, 1998 RJQ 47 (CA)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.