Canada: Leasing Lessons From California: Is Your Co-Tenancy Clause Enforceable?

Last Updated: May 8 2015
Article by Aaron Kempf

Most Canadians are familiar with many of California's notable attributes – from Hollywood, to Silicon Valley, giant redwoods, the former "Governator", Napa Valley wines and Alcatraz. However, outside of certain high-profile criminal cases we rarely hear about California court decisions. Nevertheless, landlords and tenants should take note of a recent California Court of Appeal decision dealing with an issue that has not received much attention in Canada: Are co-tenancy clauses in commercial leases enforceable?

As a starting point, a co-tenancy clause usually gives a tenant the right to terminate its lease and/or pay reduced rent if a prescribed percentage of the shopping centre becomes vacant, or if certain anchor tenant(s) fails to open or leaves the centre. The clause comes in two forms. An opening co-tenancy clause requires that one or more specific tenants, a certain percentage of the centre, or a certain number of tenants must be open and operating prior to the tenant opening for business. An ongoing co-tenancy clause states that the tenant will continue to operate and pay full rent provided that one or more named co-tenants remain open and operating, or a certain percentage or number of tenants in the centre remain open and operating. While leases typically use either an opening or an ongoing co-tenancy clause, are either enforceable? According to the California Court of Appeal, the answer (at least in California) is: "it depends".

In Grand Prospect Partners, L.P. v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc., Ross was given an opening co-tenancy clause which did not require Ross to open its store or pay rent until both Target and Mervyn's, a department store, were open for business. The clause also said that if the co-tenancy requirement was not met within 12 months of Ross taking possession of the premises (but not opening), Ross could terminate the lease. Ross took possession, but, before it opened, Mervyn's went bankrupt and closed its store in the shopping centre. As a result, the co-tenancy requirement was not satisfied and Ross elected to not open and not pay rent. After the 12-month period expired, Ross terminated its lease.

The landlord sued, arguing that the co-tenancy clause was unconscionable and constituted an unlawful penalty. The California Court of Appeal agreed with respect to the rent abatement component. This conclusion was based on the general principle that a contractual provision is an unlawful penalty if the value of the money or property given up under it is not reasonably related to the harm that is anticipated to be caused. The court accepted findings of fact by the trial judge (based on e-mails and the testimony of company executives) that Ross did not think the closure of Mervyn's would have any measurable impact on their store (i.e., no lost sales). As a result, the Court of Appeal held that Ross had breached the lease and was required to pay $672,100.00 in damages in respect of the rent payments it did not make prior to terminating the lease. The Court of Appeal disagreed, however, with the trial decision that the termination right was also unenforceable, on the grounds that neither party had any control over the closure of the Mervyn's store and the closure had no relationship to any act or default of Ross. The court also took pains to note that the determination of the enforceability of a co-tenancy provision depends heavily on the facts of each case. This is particularly important in this case, as the absence of a time limit on the rent abatement is rather unusual.

While a California decision is not binding in Canada, its lessons should not be ignored by landlords and tenants north of the 49th parallel. For one thing, Canadian courts have rarely been asked to address co-tenancy provisions. In fact, we could only find two examples. In T. Eaton Co., Re1 the court made an order that prevented tenants at retail shopping centres in which Eaton's was an anchor tenant from terminating their leases during Eaton's restructuring period. Similarly, in Target Canada Co., Re2 the court granted a stay preventing third-party tenants from exercising their co-tenancy rights while the court-supervised restructuring process was underway.

Second, the California Court of Appeal's assessment of the rent abatement as an unlawful penalty is not dissimilar to what Canadian courts have held regarding penalty clauses. Like California, under Canadian law, penalty clauses (i.e., those which specify the payment of an amount upon a breach regardless of the damages actually sustained) are generally not enforceable. In order to avoid a clause being characterized as such, the amount to be paid needs to be a reasonable and genuine pre-estimate of damages. A court may find that the clause is not enforceable if both of these elements are not present.

Assuming that Canadian courts follow California's model, the lesson to be learned is that in order for a rent abatement provision in a co-tenancy clause to be enforceable, the abatement needs to be reasonably limited, with respect to both the duration of the abatement and the expected damages suffered by the Tenant. The limitation on the duration of the abatement is likely not a significant issue, as although the co-tenancy clause in Ross's lease contained no such limit (thereby allowing the tenant, if they did not terminate the lease, to pay a reduced rent for the entire 10-year term), most co-tenancy clauses provide that if the co-tenancy violation is not cured within 12 months, the lease either terminates or the Tenant goes back to paying full rent.

Determining the tenant's damages, however, gives rise to the practical dilemma of measuring the quantum of damages. After the tenant has been operating, it could presumably provide monthly sales reports to show a decline in sales. But what if it is not yet open and has no sales reports to compare? Could a tenant present evidence of the performance of other stores in a certain region to show a drop in sales? Where the tenant cannot show it has suffered any reduced sales, but its lease says it is entitled to pay a reduced rent for a certain period as a result of the co-tenancy failure, is the time limitation by itself sufficient to make the clause reasonable? Would a court consider non-monetary damages, such as loss of prestige to the shopping centre, in determining whether the abatement is reasonable? There are no clear answers here.

Perhaps a Canadian landlord will feel daring enough to challenge the enforceability of a co-tenancy clause and provide a Canadian court with the opportunity to consider these issues. Until that time, the California Court of Appeal provides some guidelines, as well as some food for thought for Canadian landlords, tenants and their lawyers in negotiating and drafting co-tenancy clauses.


1. (1997), 46 CBR (3d) 293 (Ont Gen Div).

2. 2015 ONSC 303.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Aaron Kempf
Events from this Firm
7 Dec 2017, Webinar, Toronto, Canada

FEX Members Jeff Noble, BDO, and Caroline Abela, WeirFoulds LLP, invite you to a complimentary webinar series titled: All About Shareholders.

11 Nov 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

WeirFoulds Partner Glenn Ackerley will Chair the RICS & CIQS 5th Annual Construction & Project Management Seminar.

28 Nov 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

We invite you to join us for our fall seminar where we will discuss topics that have put employment law front and centre!

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions