Canada: Scope of Performance Bonds as Contract Security

Last Updated: April 17 2006
Article by Howard Wise


In Canada, owners often utilize performance bonds in the construction industry as a form of security to ensure that the general contractor performs its obligations under the construction contract. Provided the general contractor performs all of its obligations, the bond is returned to the surety for cancellation. If the general contractor ("Principal") defaults, then the owner ("Obligee") can exercise its rights under the performance bond.

The terms of the bond usually provide that, once the Principal is declared to be in default, the surety is entitled to proceed with the options available to it as provided by the performance bond.

However, two competing appeal court cases in different provinces call into question the scope of the bond and the obligations of the bonding company once the general contractor is declared to be in default.

Lac La Ronge

In Lac La Ronge Indian Band v. Dallas Contracting Ltd., [2004] S.J. No. 531 (Sask. C.A.) ("Lac La Ronge") the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal considered the obligations and responsibilities of the surety once the contractor is declared in default.

The contractor had failed to complete its contract on time and the owner terminated the contractor’s contract. Upon declaring the contractor in default, the owner invited tenders for the completion of the work and a claim was made under the terms of the general contractor’s performance bond.

The construction contract contained a clause which, in the event that the general contractor did not complete its work by the completion date, would oblige the contractor to pay certain liquidated damages to the owner. The owner wanted to offset this amount against the balance of the contract funds, thereby decreasing the available balance of contract funds and ultimately increasing the amount for which the surety would be responsible. The surety objected to this on the basis that a claim for liquidated damages was not within the scope of the performance bond.

The specific terms of the performance bond in Lac La Ronge gave the surety the following options in the event of default by the general contractor:

  • Remedy the default;
  • Complete the contract in accordance with its terms and conditions; or
  • Obtain bids for submission to the owner for completion of the contract and ensure sufficient funds were available to pay the cost of completion, less the balance of the contract price.

The third option provided by the performance bond defined the ‘balance of contract price’ as being the total amount payable by the Obligee to the Principal under the contract, less the amount properly paid by the Obligee to the Principal.

The court examined the language of these options in order better to understand the scope of the surety’s obligations and liabilities to the owner. After analyzing the various provisions of the bond, including the surety’s obligations under each option, the court concluded that the surety’s exposure under the bond was not to be any greater regardless of the option chosen by the bonding company. Therefore, the court held that each option must be read and interpreted in the context of the other options, ensuring that, in choosing one option over another, the surety was not subject to a greater liability.

In determining the extent of the surety’s obligation with regard to completing the work, the court stated:

"The words ‘complete the contract’ can be more easily interpreted as ‘complete the work’ than as ‘perform all obligations under the contract’. Earlier in the bond, when it refers to the owner’s obligations, it uses the word ‘perform’ rather than ‘complete’, which would lead one to conclude the parties intended a difference when they used ‘complete’ to describe the surety’s obligations."

Furthermore, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, in reviewing the language contained in the performance bond, determined that a standard form agreement, such as the performance bond, must be read in the ordinary manner and not strictly construed against either party. The court acknowledged that the surety’s responsibility under the performance bond was to guarantee the completion of the construction contract, rather than assume all of the contractor’s responsibilities and obligations under the terms of the contract.

In reviewing the owner’s ability to deduct liquidated damages, the court determined that the owner was only permitted to deduct liquidated damages only from any payment "which becomes due and payable" to the general contractor. However, the court held that, subsequent to the general contractor’s default, no further monies were due and payable to the general contractor, and the owner was not entitled to payment of the liquidated damages. Therefore, such a claim for liquidated damages could not be included in the calculation to determine the balance owing under the contract when establishing the amount for which the surety could be liable under option three of the bond.

Whitby Landmark

The Ontario Court of Appeal adopted a broader approach to the surety’s obligations when assessing the obligations under a performance bond. In Whitby Landmark Development Inc v. Mollenhauer Construction Limited (2003), 67 O.R. (3rd) 628 (C.A.) ("Whitby") the owner and the general contractor agreed to a cost-savings arrangement whereby the owner would receive 75% and the general contractor 25% of any cost savings on the project. The general contractor failed to complete its work under the contract and ultimately ceased to carry on business. The owner completed the work on its own and subsequently made a claim under the general contractor’s performance bond for an amount that included the balance of its share of the cost savings under the construction contract. The surety objected to the cost-savings claim on the basis that the performance bond did not extend to costs beyond those of completing the physical work.

In interpreting the provisions of the performance bond, the Court of Appeal concluded that where there is ambiguity in the wording of the bond, the principle of contra proferentum applies so that the ambiguity is construed against the bonding company which chose the form of the performance bond (an approach that contrasts with Lac La Ronge).

As in Lac La Ronge, the Court of Appeal also examined the scope of the three options available to the surety under the performance bond once the contractor is declared in default. In particular, the court attempted to discern the intended scope of the surety’s obligations under the performance bond and whether these extended beyond the costs of physically completing the work.

The court concluded that it was necessary to look at the underlying construction contract and that, without specific wording in the bond limiting the surety’s obligations, the surety was obligated to "complete the contract or act under the default under the Contract."

The Court of Appeal stated:

"The first option available to the surety is to remedy the Principal’s default. There is no qualification on the type of default referred to. Furthermore, the surety’s third option does not limit the surety’s obligations to funding the completion of the physical construction; instead, the bond makes the surety’s obligations inclusive of ‘other costs and damages for which the surety may be liable hereunder’."

The court further concluded that there was no language in the performance bond that "limits in any way the references to the construction contract or the obligations to complete the contract or act on a default under the contract", thereby potentially expanding the scope of the surety’s responsibilities and liabilities to the owner once the general contractor is declared to be in default.

In addition, in examining the language of the third option the court determined that, where the contract contains a cost-savings arrangement, the balance of the ‘contract price’ (as that term is used in the wording of option three of the performance bond) could be reduced by the amount that may be owing by the contractor at the time of the default. Therefore, the amount the surety may ultimately be obliged to pay to complete the work would be greater than it would have paid had there not been such a cost-savings provision in the contract. In making such a determination, the court was prepared to acknowledge that the surety might be responsible for costs other than those associated with the completion of the physical work.


Examining Lac La Ronge alongside Whitby, it is clear that the courts, faced with a similar issue, took different approaches, resulting in different outcomes.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal accepted the surety’s argument that its obligations were limited to completing the work rather than performing all of the obligations under the contract. However, the Ontario Court of Appeal concluded that the surety’s obligations may extend beyond simply completing the work and may result in the surety being responsible for damages beyond the completion of the physical work.

The analyses of the performance bonds’ terms were affected in both cases by the manner in which the balance of contract price was calculated. In Whitby, the Ontario Court of Appeal opened the door to a more expansive interpretation of the surety’s obligation based on an acceptance that the balance of contract price calculation could include a deduction for amounts owing and payable to the owner by the general contractor at the time of the default. In Lac La Ronge, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal determined that, once the general contractor had defaulted, it was owed no further amounts by the owner and as such, the owner was not entitled to deduct any further amounts from the contract price.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal did not apply the principle of contra proferentum and, in fact, determined that the performance bond should not be strictly construed against either party, as it was a standard form document used throughout the construction industry and should be given its ordinary meaning. However, the Ontario Court of Appeal applied this principle.

Finally, while the Ontario Court of Appeal did not find any ambiguity on the face of the performance bond and further determined that the bond’s language did not limit the surety’s obligations to complete the contract beyond completion of the physical work, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal adopted a much narrower interpretation of the scope of the surety’s obligations.

Until this issue is reviewed by the Canadian Supreme Court, it is clear that those relying on surety bonds as security will look to the decision that most favours their position in either responding to or making a claim under a performance bond.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions