Canada: Antitrust Advisory: Class Actions – What U.S. Clients And Counsel Need To Know

Once a novelty in Canada, antitrust class actions have evolved in recent years to become a permanent feature of the Canadian antitrust enforcement landscape. In virtually every international cartel case that has been brought in recent years, plaintiffs have launched class proceedings on behalf of direct and indirect purchasers in Canada, often in close coordination with class plaintiffs that have launched similar proceedings in the United States.

Indeed, in a number of recent instances, domestic investigations and domestic class actions in Canada have resulted in the filing of similar proceedings in the United States (such as the recent Canadian and U.S. class actions relating to chocolate and polyurethane foam). In October 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a trilogy of rulings that upheld the right of class plaintiffs to pursue indirect purchaser claims under the Competition Act and that provided critical guidance relating to the evidentiary standard for class certification. Since those rulings, the class action bar in Canada has been pushing forward to seek class certification in a range of international cases.  

In responding to a parallel class action that has been filed in Canada, U.S. clients and counsel need to be familiar with Canada's unique private remedies and distinct class action regime to ensure a seamless defence on both sides of the border.

The Private Remedy Distinction

The private remedy in Canada differs from the private right of action in the United States in a number of ways:

  • Single Damages, Not Treble Damages: A plaintiff in the United States may recover treble damages arising from anti-competitive conduct that contravenes the Sherman Act. By contrast, in Canada, a plaintiff may only recover single damages in respect of actual loss under section 36 of the Competition Act.
  • No Statutory Punitive Damages: Unlike in the United States, punitive damages – intended to punish the defendant for reprehensible, high-handed behaviour – are not recoverable under section 36. To circumvent this obstacle, a plaintiff in Canada will often seek to assert various parallel claims in tort (e.g., common law conspiracy) and in restitution (e.g., unjust enrichment, waiver of tort) in conjunction with claims under section 36. By asserting claims in restitution, plaintiffs will also seek a disgorgement of profits. However, there is a live debate in the recent certification jurisprudence as to whether these separate causes of action are viable/certifiable in light of the existence of an express statutory remedy that was adopted by Parliament.
  • "Loser Pays" Costs Rule: The parties to a civil suit in Canada, including a class action, are normally subject to traditional cost rules that generally render unsuccessful litigants liable for a portion of their opponent's costs. While this rule does not apply to certification motions in certain provinces (i.e., British Columbia), and while the courts have mitigated the harshness of this rule in several class actions, this "loser-pays" costs rule acts as a potent economic disincentive for potential antitrust plaintiffs in Canada in pursuing motions and claims with questionable merit.
  • Jury Trials Are Rare: In contrast to the practice in the United States, jury trials in commercial cases are exceptionally rare. As a result, litigants in Canada can confidently proceed on the assumption that if tried, the merits of an antitrust class action will likely be argued before a judge, not by a jury. However, in recent years, there has been no reported instance of a certified antitrust class action that has proceeded to a trial on the merits, since such cases either remain at the discovery phase or have been settled out of court. 

Differences in the Class Action Regime

The class action regime in Canada is fundamentally different than the class action regime in the United States.

  • Certification of Direct and Indirect Purchaser Claims: In 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada rejected the application of the rule of Illinois Brick in Canada, and held that indirect purchasers may assert a viable cause of action under the Competition Act. Moreover, the Court held that a class plaintiff may seek certification of a consolidated class of direct and indirect purchasers in spite of the potential conflicts. As a result, the formulation and constitution of classes in Canada is fundamentally different from the U.S. practice.
  • Multiplicity of Proceedings and Forums: In contrast to the U.S. practice, antitrust class actions are generally brought before the provincial superior courts across Canada rather than in the federal court system. Where the alleged anticompetitive conduct is potentially national in scope, a defendant will often face multiple and separate class actions in one (or more) province(s), sometimes with overlapping classes. Based on the current practice, a consortium of plaintiff firms will often seek to represent a de facto national class by filing parallel proceedings in Ontario, Québec and B.C. that propose interlocking classes that effectively cover all direct and indirect purchasers in Canada.    
  • No MDL Consolidation Mechanism: Since there is no consolidation regime in Canada similar to the U.S. MDL system, issues of competing actions and overlapping classes in Canada have generally been addressed either through contested motions or under a recent coordination protocol that has been adopted by the Canadian Bar Association. In large, cross-border cases, plaintiffs increasingly bring coordinated proceedings in Ontario, Québec and B.C. (often in parallel with U.S. proceedings), and identify a "lead jurisdiction" where pre-certification motions will be addressed in the first instance.
  • The Test for Certification: Under the certification statutes that exist in most of the provinces across Canada, there is no requirement for the plaintiff to demonstrate predominance, numerosity or typicality as is required under Federal Rule 23(b)(3). For example, in Ontario, a plaintiff need only demonstrate that there are common issues that constitute a "substantial ingredient" of each class member's claims, and that a class action is the "preferable procedure" under the circumstances. In Québec, a plaintiff need only demonstrate that the common issues of fact and/or law are important, and not simply an ancillary issue.
  • Certification in the Courts: In its trilogy of decisions in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada certified two antitrust class actions in the Microsoft case (B.C.) and the DRAM case (Québec), but the Court refused to certify a class action in the high-fructose corn syrup case (B.C.). In its decision in the Microsoft case, the Court specifically rejected the "rigorous approach" to class certification that had been adopted by the U.S. federal courts, and held that at the commonality stage, a plaintiff need only demonstrate the existence of a "credible and plausible methodology" for establishing loss on a class-wide basis. However, the Court stressed that the plaintiff's proposed methodology must offer "a realistic prospect" for demonstrating that pass-through has occurred in a manner that has harmed all class members. Since then, there have been two antitrust class actions that have been certified by the lower courts, but it remains to be seen how the courts will apply the Supreme Court's direction in future cases.    
  • Limited Discovery: Under the Canadian practice, there is only limited discovery that occurs prior to the determination of class certification, and such discovery is generally limited to the evidentiary issues that relate to class certification. In other words, in contrast to U.S. practice, it is rare for the parties to conduct merits discovery before the court has ruled on the identity of the class and the proposed common issues. 

Bottom Line: Competition authorities on both sides of the border are working together to prosecute anti-competitive behaviour and distribution practices. Related investigations, prosecutions and litigation can result in potentially massive fines, expose corporate executives to personal liability (including prison) and force companies to change their core business practices.

By understanding Canada's private remedies and class action regime, U.S. counsel can ensure the best defence – on both sides of the border.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Langlois lawyers, LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Langlois lawyers, LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions