Canada: E-Evidence: The Statutory Framework (1)

As the medium of business information moves inexorably from paper to electronic, questions such as the following are asked with greater frequency and urgency: is electronically based information as admissible in court as its paper-based ancestor?; how should information in electronic form be stored in order to satisfy legal record retention rules?; in litigation, can a party discover all of another party’s vast electronic archives?; and should all e-mails be retained so they are available in any future litigation?

As these are good and timely questions, this column kicks off a four part series on various key aspects of "e-evidence". First, we bring some of historical perspective to bear, and outline the current statutory regime for computer-based records. Next month we look at the recently published CGSB Standard on Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence, and the impact this will have on establishing best practices for the retention of electronic records. Third, we consider Ontario’s recently released e-discovery Guidelines. And finally, we review some best practices for e-mail and other electronic document retention policies.

First Evidentiary Principles

Evidence law strives to ensure that only reliable evidence is permitted to be provided to judicial and other decision makers in legal, administrative and related proceedings. To this end, a number of evidence law rules have been developed, initially in the context of oral testimony, and more recently for documents and records.

Traditionally, judges preferred oral testimony given by live witnesses, in order that the veracity of the witnesses, and their credibility, might be tested by rigorous, and sometimes withering, cross examination. Moreover, a live witness would only be allowed to testify as to matters of which he or she had personal knowledge; information they heard others say – so called – "hearsay" – was generally excluded, given that such other person should be compelled to testify first hand, so that again the reliability mechanism of cross examination could be brought to bear.

Under the traditional hearsay rule, documents were also frowned upon as evidence, because, strictly speaking, they constituted hearsay; again, the theory was that the actual author of the document should also have to appear in court.

The Rise of Business Records

By the early 1800s, paper-based business records were becoming such a prevalent means of storing information it was no longer practical to bring to court the author of every single document in the company. As important, judges took comfort in the trustworthiness of these business records because they were the very same documents that were used to organize and operate in some cases vast and impressive corporate or financial empires; in effect, if they were good enough for the specific business, they were good enough for the legal system.

As a result, there developed a very important common law exception to the hearsay rule: business records created in the ordinary course of operations could be admitted into evidence. On the other hand, the "best evidence" rule – which required that the best evidence possible be provided to the court – steered judges to prefer original documents over copies.

Over time, the business records common law exception to the hearsay rule became enshrined in Canada’s evidence law statutes. For example, in 1927 a provision was added to the Canada Evidence Act that admitted bank records made in the ordinary course of business, subject to the court’s ability to probe the so-called "foundation evidence" relating to the process that created the record to ensure its trustworthiness. Forty years later a general business records provision was added to the statute.

Computer-Generated Business Records

For the most part, in the last quarter of the 20th century, as computers made their debut in the corporate world – and then forcefully came to insinuate themselves into just about every nook and cranny of modern life - courts expressed very little reluctance to admit computer-generated records under the statutory or the common law business records exception to the hearsay rule. Where the particular requirements of the statute weren’t met, the common law rule proved to be very helpful, given that the Supreme Court had by this point agreed to permit the admission of virtually any document that was reliable.

To illustrate the flexibility of most courts in this regard, consider that in one case the Crown wished to introduce copies of the paper-based monthly records of a bank account that were generated by the bank’s computer. This particular computer (some 25 years ago) stored electronically all the deposits and withdrawals that occurred in a month, but at the end of the month printed out a paper-based cumulative record, and then the electronic memory was wiped clean, leaving the monthly paper-based account statement as the sole record.

The defence argued that the Canada Evidence Act only permits the admission of a copy of the original record, that the electronically stored data was the original record in this case, and therefore a copy of the paper-based record was inadmissible as it was not a copy of the original record. The trial judge accepted this argument, and acquitted the accused.

The Ontario Court of Appeal, however, reversed, and in a very creative judgement developed the following important principles: a record may be in any form, even an illegible one; and the form in which information is recorded may change from time to time, and the new form is equally a record of that kind of information. Based on these principles, the court held that the information in the bank’s computers changed its form when it was printed out as a paper-based monthly statement, and that this hard copy thereupon became the record that was kept by the financial institution, and hence a copy of it was admissible.

Latest Law Reform

Nevertheless, from time to time, some lower courts raised questions about the appropriate "foundation evidence" required for the admissibility of computer generated evidence. In some other cases questions were also raised about what is an "original" in the context of computer-based evidence, when applying the largely paper-based language of the traditional business records rules of the evidence statutes. One can talk of an "original" in a paper-based environment – there is usually one original and then one or more copies of the original – but in an electronic environment it is usually not helpful to speak in terms of the "original". When one person sends another an e-mail, there really isn’t a single original and multiple copies, notwithstanding that the user interface to the computer system might give us that impression.

In order to clarify these sorts of issues that developed with computer-generated evidence, most jurisdictions in Canada amended their evidence law statutes a few years ago to make clear the following. First, the new legislative changes in essence resolve the issue of what constitutes the "original" record in the context of the creation, storage and communication of electronic information by effectively abandoning the concept of original in an electronic environment. The thrust of the new provisions is to shift the analysis from an assessment of a particular electronic document to the computer-based system that produced it, and then to take comfort about this system based on its operational track record.

Second, the recent changes to the evidence law statutes provide that the best evidence rule is satisfied in respect of electronic records by proof of the integrity of the electronic records system by which the data was recorded or preserved. Moreover, the new provisions allow the integrity of the record-keeping system to be implied from the operation of the underlying computer. In short, the new amendments support the admissibility of electronic evidence, while still permitting a party to challenge it if the reliability of the computer system or network that produced it can be put into question.

So, when do you know whether you have a reliable computer system?. For the past few years this question caused some concern among companies because there were no commercially accepted standards or best practices in this area. Not until recently, that is. In the next column we look at the new Canadian General Standards Board standard, Electronic Records as Documentary Evidence, which answers this very important question.

George S. Takach is the Co-Chair of the Technology Law Group at McCarthy Tétrault, the author of Computer Law, and an Adjunct Professor in Computer Law at Osgoode Hall Law School.

This article is intended to convey brief, timely but only general information and does not constitute legal advice; readers are encouraged to speak with legal counsel to understand how the general issues noted above apply to their particular circumstances

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.