May 20, 2014 client update, we reported on significant changes
affecting automobile insurance in Prince Edward Island, including
changes to no-fault benefits available under section B and changes
to the damages cap for minor personal injury. Most of those changes
went into effect on October 1, 2014. The final change provides for
direct compensation for property damage ("DCPD"), and was
recently proclaimed to come into force on October 1,
2015. The amendments to the PEI Insurance
Act setting out the DCPD regime can be viewed here.
DCPD entitles an insured to obtain payment directly from his or
her own insurer for damage to an automobile. Recovery is based on
the insured's degree of fault, as established under a set of
fault determination rules ("Rules") prescribed by
regulation. The Rules provide specific fault determinations for
described accident scenarios, and prescribe that:
the insured's degree of fault is to be determined without
reference to the point of contact between the vehicles, and without
reference to circumstances such as weather conditions, road
conditions, visibility, or the actions of pedestrians;
if two Rules apply, and one Rule would result in the insured
being 100% at fault and the other would result in the insured not
being at fault, the insured is considered to be 50% at fault;
otherwise, if more than one Rule applies, the Rule that
attributes the least degree of fault to the insured is
if the accident is not captured by any of the Rules, or if
there is not enough information to determine the degree of fault,
fault shall be determined using the ordinary rules of law.
A complete copy of the fault determination Rules can be found in
the regulations available here. The Rules for DCPD apply on and after
October 1, 2015.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Automobile drivers, like fine wine, tend to get better with age. Older drivers can draw on a wealth of experience from their years on the road to assist them when faced by a variety of dangerous conditions.
Under B.C.'s former and current Limitation Act, the limitation period for a Plaintiff's claim can be extended on the basis of a Defendant having acknowledged in writing some liability for the cause of action.
The insurance industry will be interested in Ledcor Construction Ltd v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co because of principles the Supreme Court of Canada applied to the "faulty workmanship" exclusion in a Builders' Risk policy.
The recent Preliminary Issue decision in Walsh and Echelon (FSCO A15-007448, August 31, 2016) confirms that an economic loss does not need to be demonstrated in order to be entitled to attendant care benefits.
For the first time in BC, a Court has decided that an insured is entitled to special costs, rather than the lower tariff costs, solely because they were successful in a coverage action against their insurer.
Policyholders recently won a key victory at the Supreme Court of Canada in Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co. as the Supreme Court clarified the interpretation of a standard form...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).