Canada: It’s Your Life (And Death): Supreme Court Of Canada Permits Physician-Assisted Death In Carter v. Canada (Attorney General)

Last Updated: February 18 2015
Article by Penny Washington and Elizabeth Allan

In September 2012 we reported on a ruling by Madam Justice Smith of the British Columbia Supreme Court which held that a prohibition on physician-assisted death is unconstitutional and should be permitted in certain circumstances.1 In a unanimous ruling last Friday, our nation's highest court upheld that decision with respect to section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and made the following declaration of invalidity, which it suspended for 12 months:

Section 241 (b) and s. 14 of the Criminal Code unjustifiably infringe s. 7 [life, liberty and security of the person] of the Charter and are of no force or effect to the extent that they prohibit physician-assisted death for a competent adult person who (1) clearly consents to the termination of life and (2) has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition.2

In our view, this means that there are several pre-conditions which must be met before a physician-assisted death would not violate the Criminal Code in 12 months' time:

  1. The request must be made by a competent adult person. Adults who do not have the ability to understand and appreciate the consequences of their actions (such as those with certain cognitive disabilities) and youth cannot legally receive a physician-assisted death. A physician must assess the adult's capacity to consent;
  2. The competent adult must be clearly consenting to the specific intervention. It must be the individual herself, and not a substitute decision maker, who makes the request. We also note that consent is an ongoing process and there should be no question that this is what the individual wishes to occur at that moment in time;
  3. An irremediable condition does not require that the patient undertake treatment which is not acceptable to the individual.3 For example, chemotherapy could be theoretically be available to a cancer patient, but a competent adult is able to refuse that treatment, even though that refusal may lead to their death. Physician-assisted death may still be available to this person, even though the chemotherapy is available as a treatment; and
  4. The medical condition which is causing the competent adult to make the request must be irreversible and one which is causing intolerable and enduring suffering to her. Not all permanent medical conditions will meet this threshold.

Notably, this historic decision closely follows the dissenting reasons for judgment of Madam Justice McLachlin (as she was then), with Madam Justice L'Heureux-Dubé concurring, in the 1993 Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") case Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General).4 Now, nearly 22 years later, with Madam Justice McLachlin as the Chief Justice of Canada, the remainder of the Court has finally, and unanimously, agreed with their analysis.

The SCC's majority ruling in Rodriguez would normally have remained the law. The Rodriguez decision was the basis for our Court of Appeal's ruling that reversed the decision of the trial judge.5 The SCC has now held that: (1) when a new legal issue is raised; and (2) where there is a change in circumstances or evidence which fundamentally shift the parameters of the debate, a trial court is permitted to reconsider rulings of higher courts.6 In this case, not only was there a unique legislative and factual matrix which distinguished Carter from Rodriguez, but the evolution of the constitutional case law over the past 20 years justified the action proceeding. The SCC specifically noted that at the time of Rodriguez, there was no Western democracy that permitted physician-assisted death; now, there are eight: the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Colombia, Oregon, Washington and Montana. In addition, the trial judge heard evidence of many studies of the efficacy of the safeguards adopted in those jurisdictions to protect the vulnerable.

In terms of the constitutional analysis, section 7 of the Charter protects life, liberty and security of the person. It is rooted in a profound respect for the sanctity of life, one of society's most fundamental values; however, the Court held that section 7 does not impose a duty to live, as this would call into question the legality of any withdrawal or refusal of life saving treatment. The Court reviewed the case law and concluded that the right to life is engaged where the law or state action imposes death or an increased risk of death on a person, while concerns about autonomy and quality of life engage liberty and security of person rights. The Court held that:

[a]n individual's response to a grievous and irremediable medical condition is a matter critical to their dignity and autonomy. The law allows people in this situation to request palliative sedation, refuse artificial nutrition and hydration, or request the removal of life-sustaining medical equipment, but denies them the right to request a physician's assistance in dying. This interferes with their ability to make decisions concerning their bodily integrity and medical care and thus trenches on liberty. And, by leaving endure intolerable suffering, it impinges on their security of the person.7

Since many laws may infringe upon section 7 rights, the analysis must continue in order to determine whether or not the infringement is in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. While the principles of fundamental justice are not fixed, the three most commonly cited in relation to section 7 are that laws should not be arbitrary, overbroad, or have consequences that are grossly disproportionate to their object.8 The Court determined that a ban on physician-assisted death was not arbitrary because it helps to achieve the objective that the vulnerable are protected from ending their life in a time of weakness. However, the Court held the prohibition is nevertheless not in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice because it is overbroad – not every individual who wishes to commit suicide is vulnerable. This was not an established principle of fundamental justice at the time of Rodriguez. The Court declined to find whether or not the prohibition was grossly disproportionate in light of its finding that it was overbroad.9

The final part of the constitutional analysis considers whether the law is saved by section 1 of the Charter. That is, the Court undertakes a consideration of whether the absolute prohibition has a pressing and substantial object and the means chosen are proportionate to that object. In completing this analysis, the Court accepted the findings of the trial judge that the risks associated with physician-assisted death can be limited through a carefully designed and monitored system of safeguards and held there was no error in her analysis that the absolute prohibition is not minimally impairing and thus not proportionate to its object.10 Accordingly, the Court agreed with the trial judge and found that the prohibition on physician-assisted death is unconstitutional.

There was no discussion by the Court of what safeguards should be in place, nor how to determine if the criteria outlined by the court are met or how to proceed if an individual chooses to seek physician-assisted death. While the trial judge provided some comments in this regard, it will ultimately be left to Parliament, provincial colleges of physicians and surgeons and provincial legislatures to address. The Court specifically noted that aspects of physician-assisted death may be the subject of valid legislation by both levels of government, depending on the circumstances and focus of the legislation.

The SCC also upheld the trial judge's assessment of special costs on a full indemnity basis against the federal government, as well as the trial judge's apportionment of 10% of the trial costs to be paid for by the province of British Columbia. The Court determined that there were extraordinary circumstances present in this matter which warranted the somewhat unusual award. The assessment against the federal government is expected to amount to well over one million dollars once costs at all three levels of court are calculated.

At this time, the federal government has indicated it will not use the notwithstanding provision in the constitution to preserve the invalidated sections of the Criminal Code, and now proposes a series of consultations with federal and provincial stakeholders as to how to legislate and regulate in this area. We expect the dialogue on end-of-life matters to continue, and perhaps additional court actions to arise, as patients, their families, lawyers and physicians navigate these difficult issues.


[1] Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 886.

[2] Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 [Carter] at para. 147.

[3] Ibid at para. 127.

[4] [1993] 3 SCR 519.

[5] Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCCA 435.

[6] Carter, supra note 2 at para. 44.

[7] Ibid at para. 66.

[8] Ibid at para. 72.

[9] Ibid at paras. 84, 86 and 90.

[10] Ibid at paras. 117 and 120.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Penny Washington
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.