Canada: Canadian Tax @ Gowlings – January 2006

Last Updated: January 24 2006

Edited by Vince Imerti

  • Update of Current International Tax Issues
  • Canadian Corporate Borrower + Canadian Lender = US Withholding Tax?
  • Characterization of foreign entities for Canadian tax purposes is not as easy as you think!

Update of Current International Tax Issues

Following is a brief update of a number of current Canadian international tax issues which have previously been discussed in CanadianTax@Gowlings Volume 1 - Number 1, dated September 8, 2004 and Volume 2 - Number 1, dated April 1, 2005.


As previously discussed in this publication, the status of U.S. limited liability corporations ("LLCs") under the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention (1980) (the "Treaty") has been uncertain for a number of years. The Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") has taken the position that LLCs that are treated as corporations for Canadian tax purposes but as flow-through entities for U.S. tax purposes are not entitled to the benefits of the Treaty as they are not liable to taxation in the U.S. and, therefore, are not "resident" in the U.S. for the purposes of the Treaty. Canada and the U.S. have been in negotiations for a new protocol to the Treaty for several years now and this issue has been one of the subjects of these negotiations. While these negotiations have been on-going for some time, it is our understanding that we may see movement in this regard in the very near future.

Cross-Border Share-for-Share Exchanges

Canadian taxpayers and their advisers have made use of so-called "exchangeable share structures" for a number of years in order to synthesize a "rollover" for Canadian shareholders of Canadian corporations to foreign corporate purchasers in circumstances in which the Canadian shareholders are receiving shares of the foreign purchaser. These structures are cumbersome, complicated, and difficult to work with.

In October of 2000 the Department of Finance announced that a legislated regime for such transactions would be introduced into the Income Tax Act (Canada). This was confirmed in the Federal Budgets of 2003 and 2004. However, we are still awaiting the detailed legislative proposals (the Federal Budget of March 2004 indicated that these detailed proposals would be "released for comment in the coming months"). Nevertheless, it is our understanding that the detailed proposals are now ready to be released for comment. Hopefully we will see them soon after the Canadian federal election on the 23rd of this month. However, it is likely safe to say that one should not expect these new rules to be significantly simpler or less cumbersome to work with than the existing exchangeable share structures.

Income Fund Review

Although not, strictly speaking, a matter exclusively of relevance to Canadian international tax planning, one of the most significant developments in Canadian tax law in recent months was the purported end of the Federal Government's review of so-called "income funds". "Income fund" is a generic term used to refer to a number of business structures one of the principal objectives of which is to generate regular cash flow to investors and to shift all or a significant portion of the taxation of such cash flow to the investor level (in other words, to avoid corporate level tax that would arise in a more conventional corporate structure).

On September 8, 2005 the Department of Finance announced that it would be conducting "consultations on tax and other issues related to business income trusts and other flow-through entities" and would be receiving submissions in this regard until December 31, 2005. This announcement went largely unheeded by the Canadian investment and tax communities. Seemingly to get the attention of these communities, on September 19, 2005 the Federal Government announced that it would be suspending the issuance of any advance tax rulings relating to "flow-through entity structures" pending the completion of the previously announced consultation process. Then, on November 23, 2005, more than a month before the end of the originally announced consultation period, but just before the expected fall of the minority Liberal Government, the Minister of Finance announced that he was satisfied that no changes to the tax treatment of income funds was necessary, and the only tax changes needed to address the divergent tax treatment of corporations and income funds was a reduction in the rate of taxation on corporate dividends.

As a result, the taxation of income fund structures in Canada is, apparently, settled and will not be changed. However, notwithstanding the statements of the Minister of Finance, many people feel that we have not heard the end of this saga.

Canadian Corporate Borrower + Canadian Lender = US Withholding Tax?

Since the introduction of the US "check-the-box" regulations ("U.S. Regulations"), Canadian unlimited liability companies ("ULCs") have become an increasingly popular form of entity used by U.S. Corporations to engage in a Canadian business. Currently, both the Province of Nova Scotia and the Province of Alberta have legislation that allows the establishment of ULCs. Under the U.S. Regulations, a U.S. Corporation that owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of a ULC ("U.S. Parent") can elect to have the ULC treated as a disregarded entity for U.S. income tax purposes. This results in certain tax and accounting advantages for the U.S. Parent in the conduct of the ULC's Canadian business.

In the foregoing structure, certain interesting issues may arise as a result of the hybrid treatment of the ULC. For Canadian income tax purposes, the ULC is considered to be a corporation resident in Canada and to have all of the attributes of a Canadian corporation. While shareholders of a ULC will have unlimited liability for the ULC's obligations, such shareholders are treated as separate and distinct from the ULC for Canadian income tax purposes. For U.S. income tax purposes, the ULC is disregarded. The assets of the ULC are considered to be owned by the U.S. Parent and the business of the ULC is considered to be carried on by the U.S. Parent.

One interesting scenario results where the ULC obtains bank financing from a Canadian lender. For Canadian income tax purposes, since both the lender and the borrower (in other words, the ULC) are considered to be residents of Canada for income tax purposes, any interest payable by the ULC would not be subject to any form of source withholding in Canada. For US income tax purposes, however, because the ULC is a disregarded entity, any interest payments made by the ULC are considered to have been made by the U.S. Parent. On its face, absent any exempting provisions under the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") or any relieving provisions under the Canada-US Income Tax Convention (the "Convention"), the payment of interest by the ULC to the Canadian lender would attract US withholding tax.

Relief may be available under the Convention, depending upon the particular facts and circumstances of the business carried on by the ULC. For example, the Convention provides certain sourcing rules that deem interest to arise in a particular Contracting State. Paragraph 6 of Article 11 of the Convention provides that interest shall be deemed to arise in the Contracting State in which the payor of the interest is resident. Since, for the purposes of the Code, the payor of the interest is deemed to be the U.S. Parent, absent any further sourcing rules, the interest payable by the ULC would be deemed to arise in the U.S. (being the Contracting State where the U.S. Parent is resident). However, paragraph 6 goes on to provide that where the person paying the interest, whether it is a resident of a Contracting State or not, has in a State other than that in which it is a resident, a permanent establishment or fixed base in connection with which the indebtedness on which the interest is paid was incurred, and such interest is borne by such permanent establishment or fixed base, then such interest shall be deemed to arise in the State in which the permanent establishment or fixed base is situated and not in the State of which the payor is resident. Therefore, provided the ULC has either a permanent establishment or fixed base in Canada, paragraph 6 of Article 11 of the Convention will deem the interest to arise in Canada and, therefore, no U.S. withholding tax should apply.

If the ULC does not have a permanent establishment or fixed base in Canada, other planning steps may be required. For example, a second shareholder of the ULC could be introduced. The U.S. Parent may incorporate a wholly owned subsidiary to acquire a small interest in the ULC or another entity within the U.S. Parent's related group may acquire a small interest in the ULC. We understand that once the ULC is no longer wholly owned by the U.S. Parent, the ULC will not be treated as a disregarded entity, but rather as a foreign partnership for U.S. income tax purposes. Provided the ULC does not carry on any business in the U.S., the sourcing rules under the Code would ordinarily deem the interest paid by the "foreign partnership" to arise outside of the U.S. and, therefore, not be subject to U.S. withholding tax. Caution should be had in implementing this type of structure given the U.S. business purpose test that must be met in order to justify the minority shareholding of the ULC.

The foregoing is but one example of certain anomalous results which may arise with U.S. owned ULC structures because of the hybrid nature of the ULC. Once such issues are identified, however, careful planning, and in some circumstances, additional tax structuring, is usually sufficient to manage such issues and preserve the tax and accounting benefits which drive the ULC structures.

Characterization of foreign entities for Canadian tax purposes is not as easy as you think!

It is safe to say that in recent years we have seen an explosion in the use of hybrid business organizations in international tax planning. In this context a "hybrid" refers to an organization that receives one form of treatment in one taxing jurisdiction but a different form in another. Examples in a Canadian context are Alberta unlimited liability corporations or Nova Scotia unlimited liability companies, both of which are treated as taxable corporations for Canadian tax purposes but can elect to be treated as flow-through entities for U.S. tax purposes.

While the characterization of foreign entities for Canadian tax purposes is, in many cases, relatively straight forward, in some cases this can be a difficult exercise. In general, one must look to the characteristics and legal relationships as determined by the governing foreign law and compare those against Canadian concepts to determine how a foreign entity will be treated for Canadian tax purposes.

As an aid in this process, the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") has published a list of foreign entities that it considers to be corporations. While many of these foreign entities have characteristics of a partnership and are treated as such in the governing jurisdiction, CRA treats them as corporations for Canadian tax purposes. As the CRA's list does not cover all foreign entities, one must consider the factors that are taken into account when determining the characterization of a foreign entity.

The term "partnership" is not defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada) ("Canadian Tax Act"). Accordingly, in deciding whether a particular foreign entity should be treated as a partnership for Canadian tax purposes, a review of its meaning under Canadian (in this case provincial) law is required as a partnership is a legal concept derived from the common law and the relevant provincial partnership statutes.

The seminal court decision in respect of the subsistence of a partnership under Canadian law is the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Continental Bank of Canada v. R. In that case, the Court stated that three essential elements of a partnership must be present in order to have a valid partnership. The three elements are: (1) there must be a business, (2) the business must be carried on in common by two or more persons, and (3) the business must be carried on with a view to profit. The CRA's views on the existence of a partnership are generally consistent with the views of the Court as expressed in Continental Bank. The CRA has also provided the following guidance:

  • if the right to a share of profits of a party represents the payment of an obligation as opposed to a partnership right to so share, any presumption of partnership relating to the share of profits is rebutted;
  • if several persons form an association for the purpose of carrying out particular business transactions without accepting total liability for the association's debt (in other words, if each associated person is liable only for their respective portions of the debts), the existence of such an arrangement is viewed as in indication that a partnership does not exist.

On the other hand, the Canadian Tax Act defines "corporation" to include an "incorporated company", which is not further defined in the Canadian Tax Act. Subsection 35(1) of the Interpretation Act (Canada) provides that a corporation does not include a partnership that is considered to be a separate legal entity under the provincial law, but does not extend this exclusion to a partnership governed by foreign law that has a separate legal personality.

The CRA has stated that a corporation is an entity created by law having a legal personality and existence separate and distinct from the personality and existence of those who caused its creation or those who own it. Furthermore, the CRA has stated that as long as an entity has such a separate identity and existence, it will consider such entity to be a corporation even though under some circumstances or for some purposes the law may ignore some facet of its separate existence or identity.

This statement suggests that the CRA uses a bright-line test based on the characteristic of a separate legal personality in determining whether an entity is a corporation. A review of CRA's published positions reveals that where the separate legal personality is explicitly stated in the legislation governing the non-resident entity, in most cases, such an entity will be considered a corporation for purposes of the Act. For example, the CRA has concluded that a Tennessee limited liability corporation ("LLC"), a Kentucky LLC and a New York LLC would be corporations based on the fact that the governing laws declare the LLC to be a separate legal entity. In the case of a Michigan LLC, the CRA has noted the fact that the entity can own property in its own right, and can sue and be sued, are characteristics amounting to a separate legal personality.

However, in some CRA technical interpretations in respect of the appropriate characterization of a non-resident entity, the CRA has considered other attributes of the foreign entity in addition to the separate legal personality test. For example, in determining whether an entity governed by the Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act ("DRUPA") is a partnership for Canadian income tax purposes, the CRA has stated that the existence of a separate legal entity clause contained in foreign partnership legislation would not, by itself, preclude an arrangement from being considered as a partnership for Canadian income tax purposes. In coming to this conclusion, the CRA indicated that the attributes of an entity created under foreign partnership legislation should be compared to those of a Canadian partnership and a Canadian corporation when determining the classification of the foreign entity for Canadian tax purposes.

Some of the other factors that the CRA has considered include:

  • limited liability of the members
  • number of members
  • perpetual or limited life of the entity
  • member's share of entity's profits
  • transferability of ownership interest
  • ownership by members of entity's property.

For example, in determining whether a SRL formed under the Barbados Societies with Restricted Liability Act is treated as a corporation for Canadian tax purposes, the CRA identified a list of key attributes of the foreign entity. Despite the fact that an SRL has attributes that are more similar to a partnership, the CRA concluded that as a whole, the SRL more closely resembles a corporation under Canadian common law.

Accordingly, it is evident that the determination of whether a foreign entity would be considered as a corporation for Canadian income tax purposes will not rest solely on the fact that it is a separate legal entity. In addition to that important attribute, all other attributes of the foreign entity in question must be considered and compared with those of a Canadian partnership and a corporation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.