Canada: The ICRC’s Power To Order An Independent Medical Examination: The Ontario Divisional Court’s Decision In Iacovelli v. College Of Nurses Of Ontario

The recent Divisional Court decision of Iacovelli v. College of Nurses of Ontario1 discusses the significant power of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee ("ICRC") of a health regulatory College to order an independent medical examination. The decision confirms that whether the ICRC can order an independent medical examination will depend on the "reasonable and probable grounds" before it, and does not require the ICRC to perform a separate Charter-based rights analysis. This is consistent with a health regulatory College's overriding duty to protect the public interest – the requirement of "reasonable and probable grounds" takes the member's interest into consideration and provides the proper balancing of these interests against those of the public.

Summary of Iacovelli v. College of Nurses of Ontario

In Iacovelli v. College of Nurses of Ontario, the Divisional Court considered an application for judicial review by a registered nurse, Iacovelli, of a decision of the ICRC of the College of Nurses of Ontario (the "College") requiring him to undergo an independent medical examination to assess his capacity to practise as a nurse.

In April 2013, Iacovelli had a near-fatal overdose from opiates during the course of his employment. Following this incident, Iacovelli admitted to his employer that he had a drug addiction and that he had regularly been under the influence of opiates at work.

The College initiated an inquiry, through its ICRC, to determine whether the applicant was "incapacitated" within the meaning of s.1(1) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act (the "RHPA"). The ICRC notified Iacovelli of its inquiry and requested that he provide the College with his health records.

Iacovelli's response to the ICRC, through counsel, included a medical report from his treating physician, Dr. Lisa Lefebvre, an addiction specialist. Dr. Lefebvre's report diagnosed Iacovelli as having an opioid dependence which had been in remission for a period of five months, and recommended that Iacovelli be allowed to continue practising with certain terms, conditions and limitations. In its accompanying letter to the ICRC, counsel for Iacovelli noted that Dr. Lefebvre's qualifications had been approved by the College and that she had previously been retained by the College as an independent expert, and therefore a further assessment by a different addiction specialist was not required.

In October 2013, the ICRC panel wrote to Iacovelli requiring him to undergo an independent medical examination. Iacovelli refused and subsequently brought an application for judicial review of the panel's decision to the Divisional Court.

Iacovelli argued before the Divisional Court that the ICRC was required to consider values arising from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"), and that in ordering him to undergo an independent medical examination when he had already undergone an examination by Dr. Lefebvre, the ICRC failed to consider those values and infringed on his fundamental rights to bodily and psychological integrity, medical privacy and equality. Iacovelli further argued that Dr. Lefebvre's report was an adequate alternative to the independent medical examination ordered by the ICRC.

In determining Iacovelli's appeal, the Divisional Court first considered the College's statutory and regulatory framework in detail and outlined the roles of the Registrar, the ICRC and the Fitness to Practise Committee ("FTPC") in determinations of incapacity. Most importantly, the Divisional Court found that, unlike the FTPC to which it may refer matters of incapacity, the ICRC is not an adjudicative body. Rather, it plays a gatekeeper function, collecting relevant information for the actual decision-maker, the FTPC.

With respect to Iacovelli's first argument – whether the ICRC was required to take into account Charter values and make an order that was "the least onerous and least restrictive" to the individual's rights to equality, bodily integrity and privacy – the Divisional Court determined that this was not required by the ICRC's mandate under the Health Professions Procedural Code.

The Health Professions Procedural Code requires that there be "reasonable and probable grounds" before the ICRC can order that an individual submit to an independent medical examination. The Court held that this requirement of "reasonable and probable grounds" ensures that the individual's privacy and integrity rights are protected – no further "Charter values" analysis is required. The Court found that the ICRC is not required to consider whether its actions are the "least onerous and least restrictive" to the member. This standard, which is a criminal one, does not appear in the RHPA and is not suitable to the functions of a health profession College. Instead, the College's duty is to serve and protect the public interest, and a member's interest in practising without restrictions will take second place to this overriding duty.

The Court wholly rejected Iacovelli's second argument that Dr. Lefebvre's report was an adequate alternative to an independent medical examination. The Court endorsed the College's submissions that the roles of a treating physician and independent medical examiner are distinct, and that a treating physician may be in a conflict of interest in providing an independent opinion about his or her patient. In the circumstances of Dr. Lefebvre's report, the Court found that it was reasonable for the ICRC to require the objectivity of an independent health examiner.

Lessons Learned

The Divisional Court's decision in Iacovelli confirms the scope of the ICRC's duties as set out in the Health Professions Procedural Code.

First, the ICRC is not an adjudicative body – it performs an investigative role. It is the FTPC that makes determinations of incapacity, not the ICRC.

Secondly, the ICRC is not required to perform a Charter rights-based analysis in considering whether to order a member to submit to an independent medical examination. Indeed, the ICRC, as an investigative rather than adjudicative body, is not equipped to make such an analysis. A consideration of whether the independent medical examination is "the least onerous and least restrictive" option available to the member is not applicable in the context of a health profession College. It is enough for the ICRC to consider where there are "reasonable and probable grounds" on which to make such an order, as the Health Professions Procedural Code requires. This standard provides the necessary balancing of the member's interests against the overriding interest of the public.

Lastly, a report by a treating physician (whether or not such physician has previously been retained as an independent expert by the College) is not an adequate alternative to an independent medical examination. The ICRC is entitled to an objective analysis of the member's capacity to practise in order to protect the public interest.

Cases in which members present challenges to a regulator's requirements present a difficult balancing of Charter, Human Rights Code and privacy rights against the protection of the public interest. In this case, in its rejection of a stand alone "least onerous and least restrictive" test to supplement the ICRC's "reasonable and probable grounds" requirement, the Divisional Court comes down strongly on the regulatory side. Indeed, the Court appears to assign a higher priority to public protection than to the member's interest in practising without restrictions. This sort of language is reflected in the Court's earlier decision in Trozzi2 and the Court of Appeal's decision in Sazant3. These principles will be useful in responding to future Charter and Human Rights Code complaints by members against their Colleges.


1. Iacovelli v. College of Nurses of Ontario, 2014 ONSC 7267.

2. College of Nurses v. Trozzi, 2011 ONSC 4614

3. Sazant v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2012 ONCA 727, leave to appeal refused [2012] S.C.C.A. No. 549

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
7 Dec 2017, Webinar, Toronto, Canada

FEX Members Jeff Noble, BDO, and Caroline Abela, WeirFoulds LLP, invite you to a complimentary webinar series titled: All About Shareholders.

11 Nov 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

WeirFoulds Partner Glenn Ackerley will Chair the RICS & CIQS 5th Annual Construction & Project Management Seminar.

15 Nov 2018, Conference, Kingston, Jamaica

WeirFoulds is a proud sponsor of JAMBAR's Annual Weekend Conference.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions