Canada: Directors Of A Corporation That May Be On The Path To Insolvency

1. Introduction

This paper is intended to give directors a better understanding of what is expected of them and what they can expect when the corporation is insolvent or on the path to insolvency.

There may be factors that destroy a business that cannot be anticipated, but generally, corporations do not suddenly become insolvent. Bellwether symptoms present themselves to directors that can and should be recognized.

Recent insolvencies show increased activism by affected stakeholders, such as shareholders, creditors, employees, pension funds and environmental authorities. When insolvency is a reality, these stakeholders often look to the directors, officers, advisors, lawyers and auditors to justify their actions- or inaction.

Directors must receive timely, reliable information from management and professional advisors. It is the directors' right and obligation to insist upon the provision of this information, but they should not merely receive the information (or ignore it) without question or challenge.

2. Where are the Gatekeepers?

I refer to a Delaware case where the court directed its comments to a corporation's lawyers and accountants. These comments have equal application to directors.

In Lincoln Savings and Loan Association v. Wall,1 the CEO of an insolvent corporation testified that he surrounded himself with scores of accountants and lawyers to make sure that all transactions were legal.

The Court asked:

Where were these professionals, a number of whom are now asserting their rights under the Fifth Amendment when these clearly improper transactions were being consummated?

Why didn't any of them speak up or disassociate themselves from the transactions?

Where also are the outside accountants and the attorneys when these transactions were effectuated?

What is difficult to understand is that with all the professional talent involved (both accounting and legal) why at least one professional could not have blown the whistle to stop the overreaching that took place in this case.

If financial statements provided to the directors are positive and encouraging, the normal reaction of the directors is to compliment themselves and management. Consider, however that the financial statements may be based on incorrect or incomplete information provided by management.

It is also possible that the financial statements, although accurate, are not fully understood by the directors. For instance, the indicated earnings may be significant, but these earnings may not represent realizable value. There may not be enough money available from the current assets to accommodate the operations of the corporation.

Financial statements show the financial position of the corporation at a given point in time on a going concern basis. Management should regularly provide the directors with statistics that highlight the corporation's key indicators and trends so that the directors have a clear understanding of these indicators and their historical trajectory, and can more easily project trends into the future.

As stated in Puda Coal Inc.,2 directors have a duty to think. When it is disclosed that the corporation is insolvent and had been on a path to insolvency for some time, the stakeholders will ask the directors what they did as gatekeepers to discharge their duties.

Directors will be held accountable, more so if affected stakeholders move to access the deep pockets of the directors' insurers. Quite often, the directors' and officers' insurance may not be available or be sufficient to cover the costs of the defence and any damages for which the directors may be found liable.

When a corporation is insolvent or is on the path to insolvency, the directors should act swiftly so as not to increase losses or incur new obligations. They should be very careful not to permit the corporation to incur new debts, or undertake new obligations, for which payment or satisfaction is not possible.

Not all corporations can be saved. If liquidation is the only available alternative, then this also must be addressed quickly to maximize recovery for the other stakeholders.

We will review in this paper how the courts examine the conduct of directors when the corporation is insolvent or approaching insolvency.

3. Duties of Directors

Subject to a unanimous shareholders agreement, directors are required to manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the corporation.3

Directors have two duties:

  1. a fiduciary duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation; and
  2. a duty to exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances;

All case law relating to directors' duties stems from these two principles.

In BCE Inc.,4the court considered these duties. Directors have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the corporation. Often the interests of the shareholders and the other stakeholders coincide with the interests of the corporation. If, however, these interests conflict, the director's duty is to the corporation.

The court considered People's Department Stores Inc. v. Wise5 where at para 42 the court stated:

We accept as an accurate statement of law that in determining whether they are acting with a view to the best interests of the corporation it may be legitimate, given all the circumstances of a given case, for the board of directors to consider, inter alia the interest of shareholders, employees, suppliers, creditors, consumers, governments and the environment.

As noted, directors have a duty to act as reasonably prudent persons would in comparable circumstances, which duty is not owed solely to the corporation. If the directors act in the best interests of the corporation, and in so doing exercise the care, diligence and skill of a reasonably prudent person in comparable circumstances as good corporate citizens, they will be meeting the reasonable expectation of other stakeholders.

The directors are also exposed to stakeholders' claims pursuant to section 248 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act ("OBCA") and section 241 of the Canada Business Corporations Act ("CBCA") with respect to oppression remedies, and as well to claims made via derivative actions.

BCE Inc. goes on to state that:

the corporation and shareholders are entitled to maximize profit and share value to be sure, but not by treating individual stakeholders unfairly.

Finlayson JA in Montreal Trust Co. of Canada v. Scotia MacLeod Inc.6 stated

a corporation may be liable for contracts that its directors or officers have caused it to sign, or for the representations those officers or directors have made in its name, but this is because a corporation can only operate through human agency, that is, through its "directing mind." Considering that a corporation is an inanimate piece of legal machinery incapable of thought or action, the court can only determine its legal liability by assessing the conduct of those who caused the company to act in the way that it did. This does not mean however, that if the actions of the directing minds are found wanting, that personal liability will flow through the corporation to those who caused it to act as it did.

In order for the directors to be liable, they must have done something that takes them out of the role of directing minds so that they "exhibit a separate identity or interest from that of the company so as to make the act or conduct complained of, their own."

If the directors cause the corporation to acquire goods or services on credit, knowing that the corporation cannot pay for them they would not be immune from attack by aggrieved persons, even if they were acting in what they thought was the best interests of the corporation.

In People's Department Store Ltd.,7the court stated that the director's fiduciary duty does not change when a corporation is in the "vicinity of insolvency."

If directors act honestly and in good faith, with the intent to improve the position of the stakeholders, even if they are not successful, they will not have breached their duties. The courts do not expect perfection from directors, only that they discharge their duties and act as a reasonable and prudent person would in comparable circumstances. This has given rise to what has been described as the business judgment rule.

As stated in People's:

many decisions made in the course of business, although ultimately unsuccessful, are reasonable and defensible at the time they are made. Business decisions must sometimes be made with high stakes and under considerable time pressure, in circumstances in which detailed information is not available. It might be tempting for some to see unsuccessful business decisions as unreasonable or imprudent in light of information that becomes available ex post facto. Because of this risk of hindsight bias, Canadian Courts have developed a rule of deference to business decisions called the business judgment rule, adopting the American name for the rule.

The directors' fiduciary duty does not change when a corporation is in the nebulous vicinity of insolvency. That phrase has not been defined; moreover, it is incapable of definition and has no legal meaning. What it is obviously intended to convey is a deterioration in the corporation's financial stability. In assessing the actions of directors, it is evident that any honest and good faith attempt to redress the corporation's financial problems will, if successful, both retain value for shareholders and improve the position of creditors. If unsuccessful, it will not qualify as a breach of the statutory fiduciary duty.

Perfection is not demanded. Courts are ill-suited to and should be reluctant to second guess the application of business expertise to the considerations that are involved in corporate decision making, but they are capable, on the facts of any case, of determining whether an appropriate degree of prudence and diligence was brought to bear in reaching what is claimed to be a reasonable business decision at the time it was made.

If directors act fairly when confronted with actual or impending insolvency with proper regard for the corporation and by extension for the welfare of other stakeholders, then they will have discharged their duty to the corporation and will have exercised the skill and judgment that is expected of them.

If, however, the directors act out of self-interest, or disregard the interests of other stakeholders, or act with willful neglect or without concern for the corporation's financial position, then they leave themselves open to attack, both by the corporation and by other stakeholders. This should not be misunderstood to mean that the interests of the corporation must be suborned to the interests of the other stakeholders.

The court will give appropriate deference to the application of the business judgment rule. See also Pente Investments Management Ltd. v. Schneider Corp.8

Corporations are not obliged to avoid all ventures that involve an element of risk. The conscience of the corporation, as well as its management, is consigned to directors who must properly administer the property so that it is not dissipated or exploited for the benefit of the directors themselves to the prejudice of the creditors: Winkworth v. Edward Baron Development Co. Limited et al.9

In Unique Broadband Systems Inc.,10a corporate director argued that there was no breach of a fiduciary duty because the director was removed from office before an intended impugned payment could be made. Accordingly, the director argued that no damages had been suffered.

The Court of Appeal rejected this submission and relied on a statement made by Mark Ellis in his text Fiduciary Duties in Canada (Carswell, Toronto 2014 Ch. 1 at 5).

Entering into a potential conflict of interest is a breach whether or not the conflict is operative; once such a conflict becomes operative to jeopardize the beneficiary or his property, the fiduciary breach would then give rise to the remedies available at law. The point is important: to wait until damages or prejudice actually occurs is to prejudice the beneficiary's right to utmost loyalty and avoidance of conflict. If such a schism in theory is allowed, the law would be encouraging a finding that the duty "piggy-backs" the damage caused rather than premising damages on the basis of duty.

The conduct of directors may very well be investigated in insolvency proceedings where it is the mandate of the Trustee, Receiver, and possibly a Monitor to examine possible degradation of corporate assets.

In ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd.,11 the court had to consider a claim made against a corporation and its directors claiming they induced a breach of fiduciary duty, and a breach of contract. The Ontario Court of Appeal recognized the concerns of the lower court regarding the proliferation of claims against officers and directors of corporations in circumstances which indicate the desire by the claimants for leverage in the litigation process. This is of concern to the courts, because business cannot function efficiently if corporate officers and directors are inhibited in carrying on the business of the corporation for fear of being exposed to ill-founded ligation.

The Court recognized the application of Said v. Butt,12 which held that there is an independent cause of action against directors that looks through the corporation to the directors in what is known as piercing or lifting the corporate veil. The Said case is authority for the proposition that there is a distinction between the corporation and the directors, if it is established that the directors acted bona fide for the protection of the interests of the corporation. This anticipates that the director had not acted fraudulently or improperly, so that it could be said that he acted bona fide in the best interests of the corporation.

Officers and directors are however responsible for their tortious conduct, even though that conduct was meant to be in the best interests of the corporation. Fraud committed by a director to increase the revenue of the corporation cannot be said to be bona fide and in the best interests of the corporation. See Kepic v. Tecumseh Road Builders.13

Where a corporate veil has been pierced, it usually involves transactions where the use of the corporate structure was a sham from the outset: See Montreal Trust and Scotia MacLeod.14

To read this Paper in full, please click here.


1. (1990) 743, F. Supp 901 District of Columbia.

2. Puda Cole Inc., Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, (2013) Consolidated C.A. No. 6476 – CS (Del Ch.)

3. Section 115(1) OBCA; s.102(1) CBCA.

4. (2008) 301 D.L.R. (4th) 80 (SCC).

5. (2004) 244 D.L.R. (4th) 564 (SCC).

6. (1996) 129 D.L.R. (4th) 711 (ONCA). Leave to Appeal refused.

7. (2004) 244 D.L.R. (4th) 564 (SCC).

8. (1998) 42 O.R. (3rd) (177) Ont. (CA) and Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc. (2007) 2 SCR 331.

9. [1987] 1 All E.R. 114.

10. (2014) ONCA 538.

11. (1999) 168 D.L.R. (4th) 351.

12. [1920] 3 K.B. 497.

13. (1987) 18 C.C.E.I. 218 (Ont. C.A).

14. (1995) 129 D.L.R.(4th) 711.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.