Canada: Blakes Bulletin on International Trade - China Focus - December 2005

Last Updated: December 21 2005

Canada-China Investment Protection Agreement – A Significant Stepping Stone to Deeper Economic Co-Operation

Article by Cliff Sosnow, ©2005, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The pieces of the Canada-China economic puzzle are starting to come together and the picture that emerges reveals a slowly developing but inevitably closer economic relationship between these two economies.

The People’s Republic of China (excluding the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) is Canada’s fourth largest export market. In 2004, Canada’s total merchandising exports of goods to China amounted to C$6.6 billion, an increase of 39% over 2003. Total merchandising imports from China increased to C$24.1 billion in 2004, up 30% over 2003. Canada ranks as amongst China’s top 10 trading partners and amongst its top 10 export markets.

But, given the evident importance of the Canadian and Chinese markets to each of these countries, the level of direct investment by each country in the others’ market, while slowly increasing, is nevertheless modest. The stock of Canadian direct investment in China for 2004 was C$647 million. And estimates of the stock of Chinese direct investment into Canada in 2004 is about one third of that. It is not as if Chinese investors are not interested in the Canadian market or that Canadian companies do not identify China as a desirable destination for the investment dollars. Aside from Canada’s natural resources and energy sectors, Chinese investors have expressed interest in Canada sectors diverse as information and communication technology, biotechnology, agri-food, pharmaceuticals and manufacturing. Canadian investment interest in China includes aerospace, biotechnology, education, finance, manufacturing and natural resources. Logic suggests that direct investment in each others’ market should be higher than it is.

Bilateral Investment Treaty Negotiations

To open up the investment gates and encourage direct investment in each others markets, Canada and China resumed stalled negotiations in Beijing in September, 2004 to develop a Canada-China bilateral investment treaty (also called a foreign investment protection and promotion agreement by Canadian officials). This is a signal achievement whose importance cannot be over-stated or over-valued.

Bilateral investment treaties are agreements aimed at protecting and promoting foreign investment. They accomplish this by setting out the respective rights and obligations of the countries that sign the agreement. Typically, bilateral investment treaties seek to ensure that foreign investors will not be treated worse than similarly situated domestic investors or other foreign investors; that they will not have their investment expropriated without prompt and adequate compensation; and, in most circumstances, that investors will be free to invest capital and repatriate their investment and returns. In effect, bilateral investment treaties tell the investment community that its investment is welcomed and can operate in a safe, secure and predictable legal environment.

Consultation Is Lacking

But, in law, process is as important as product and there are serious question marks about the process. Negotiators met in Ottawa in June 2005 and the message coming out of the negotiations is that both Canada and China are striving for a high quality agreement. But the contents of the agreement remain a mystery to those that the agreement is intended to most directly assist: the investor. Will the agreement give investors access to international arbitration? Will international arbitration, if provided, be first subject to an expedited domestic review procedure as is the case in the investment treaty recently signed between the Netherlands and China? Recognizing the right of Canada and China to regulate in the public interest, what will be the grounds for legitimate expropriation of investments and how will compensation be assessed? What industries and sectors will be "carved-out" of the investment treaty and what government activity will both countries want to exclude from the operation of the treaty? Without greater investor involvement, answers to the questions may have to wait for the completion of the negotiations.

The Canadian Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade does not think this is an acceptable process. In a recent report on trade and investment relations between Canada and China, it recommended that in its negotiations with China (and other key emerging markets) Canada consult with business as it pieces together the elements of an agreement intended to stimulate direct investment in China.

The negotiation of a bilateral investment treaty between Canada and China, the second-largest destination of foreign direct investment, is a major development on the road to deeper economic ties between these two countries. It is critical for companies with an interest in both the Canadian and the Chinese market to feed into the negotiating process to ensure that the rules that are negotiated strengthen the investment ties between Canada and China.

Trade Remedy Cases Involving China in 2005

Article by Greg Kanargelidis, ©2005, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is often the target of complaints by Canadian manufacturing companies that the PRC is "dumping" goods into Canada which is causing "material injury" to Canadian manufacturers. The year 2005 was no exception. This article will discuss the dumping and subsidy cases involving the PRC that were concluded in 2005.

Canadian Rules on Dumping Investigations

Pursuant to international trade rules, where exporters to Canada are found to be "dumping" their product and the dumping results in "material injury" to Canadian manufacturers of identical or similar goods, Canada is authorized to impose an "anti-dumping" duty equal to the margin of dumping. These duties remain in place for five years and can be renewed for additional periods of five years.

Allegations of Dumping in 2005

In 2005, exporters from the PRC were the subject of two "inquiries" by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) and one "expiry review". The two inquiries in question involved Certain Steel and Stainless Steel Fasteners and Certain Laminate Flooring. Both inquiries were the result of a formal complaint filed by the respective Canadian manufacturers in 2004. In both cases, anti-dumping duties were imposed on goods sold by PRC exporters on the basis there was evidence of dumping and that the dumping caused material injury (subject to some exceptions).

In Certain Steel and Stainless Steel Fasteners, PRC (and Chinese Taipei) exporters were found to be "dumping" the goods at margins ranging from 3.46% to 115.45%. These duties were imposed for five years on carbon steel screws from the PRC; all other types of subject fasteners were not imposed with such duties, either because the CITT found "no injury" or because the volume of the goods was negligible.

In Certain Laminate Flooring, the PRC and six other countries were targeted as dumping their goods into Canada. However, at the time of the CBSA’s final determination of dumping, the investigation was terminated in the case of 5 countries, leaving only the PRC and France. PRC exporters were found to be dumping their goods at margins ranging from 0% to 17%. These duties were imposed for five years because the CITT found that the dumping by PRC exporters had caused material injury to Canadian manufacturers of identical or similar goods. On November 14, 2005, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) initiated a "reinvestigation" of normal values and this represents an opportunity for PRC exporters to obtain lower normal values or demonstrate that they are not dumping.

Allegations of Unfair Subsidization

For the first time in Canada, the PRC was alleged to be unfairly subsidizing its exporters. This occurred in Certain Steel and Stainless Steel Fasteners. The CBSA finally determined that the PRC subsidized its exporters of subject goods to the extent of 1.25 RMB/kg. In 2005, there was a second allegation of unfair subsidization by PRC, this time in Laminate Flooring. In this case, the CBSA finally determined that the PRC subsidized its exporters of subject goods in the range 0 – 3.54 RMB/square metre.

Policy Change on "Zeroing" Benefits PRC Exporters

The case involving Certain Laminate Flooring is also notable because it was during that case that the CBSA ceased applying the "zeroing" methodology it has historically applied in making dumping calculations. When "zeroing" was applied, the CBSA would ignore (by setting to zero) any instances where there was no dumping, which tends to raise the resulting "margin of dumping". PRC exporters (indeed, all exporters) should be pleased about the CBSA’s decision since future calculations will tend to result in lower overall margins of dumping per exporter.

PRC Exporters Celebrate End to Duties on Women’s Boots

Another notable event which occurred in 2005 involved the expiry review by the CITT of the finding on Women’s Boots. Women’s boots have been subject to anti-dumping duties in Canada since 1990. The anti-dumping duty imposed on exports by PRC exporters was 29% until January 31, 2005, at which time the CBSA raised it to 72.1% following the conclusion of a reinvestigation. As a result, many importers of women’s boots made in the PRC participated in the CITT’s expiry review proceeding, and were able to persuade the CITT to rescind the finding rather than renew it for another five years. Since the CITT’s Order to rescind on April 29, 2005, PRC exporters can sell their women’s boots to customers in Canada free of any anti-dumping duties.

2005 — The Year of the Safeguard?

Article by Ken Purchase, ©2005, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Canada must delicately balance the protection of domestic manufacturers with its desire to foster a robust trading relationship with the planet’s emerging trade superpower.

Introduction

2005 saw a sharp increase in safeguard complaints by Canadian industry. In the 10 years since the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Canada had conducted only one safeguard inquiry – the 2001 inquiry concerning steel imports. In 2005, however, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) made recommendations in two cases and is considering an additional three complaints. Chinese imports are the primary target, but it is not just Chinese manufacturers and their Canadian importers whose lives are made difficult by the surge in complaints. Canada must delicately balance the protection of domestic manufacturers with its desire to foster a robust trading relationship with the planet’s emerging trade superpower.

Safeguards, Market Disruption and Trade Diversion Investigations

A safeguard is an extraordinary measure intended to provide a limited escape clause from international trade obligations when unanticipated import surges overwhelm and seriously injure a domestic market. The principal advantage of a safeguard over a dumping investigation is that one need not demonstrate that imports are "unfairly" priced. Instead, it is sufficient that there has been an import surge causing, or threatening to cause, serious injury to domestic producers.

Historically, a major drawback of safeguards was that duties had to be applied identically to imports from all countries. As a condition of its entry to the WTO, China gave other WTO Members the right to apply an additional two safeguard-like remedies to Chinese imports: market disruption and trade diversion inquiries.

Market disruption is a safeguard remedy applied only to Chinese imports. The remedy also employs a lower threshold: imports must simply be a significant cause of material injury, rather than a principal cause of serious injury.

A trade diversion inquiry determines whether any action affecting the import of Chinese goods into the market of another country causes, or threatens to cause, a significant diversion of trade into the Canadian market.

While Canada has yet to conduct a trade diversion inquiry, 2005 was an active year for both safeguard and market disruption complaints.

2005 Cases

The CITT released its recommendations in the Bicycles Global Safeguard Inquiry and the Barbeques Market Disruption Inquiry in September and October of 2005, respectively. The domestic industry was successful in both cases. In Bicycles, the CITT recommended three years of substantial duties. Although global safeguards are intended to apply to all imports, the CITT decision excludes Canada’s free-trade partners and some developing countries (but not China). In Barbeques, the CITT recommended imposing a 15% import surtax. The domestic industry’s success in these cases will likely spur similar complaints. Indeed, two more complaints – a global safeguard complaint concerning tobacco and a market disruption complaint involving residential furniture - were filed with the CITT within weeks of the Barbeques decision. These were in addition to a market disruption complaint concerning Chinese apparel filed in July.

The CITT is not the End of the Process

The increase in complaints is not surprising. The CITT has now recommended imposing duties in all three safeguard-like inquiries concluded since the WTO’s inception. Recommendations do not, however, necessarily result in the imposition of large import duties. Canada must decide whether and how to implement those recommendations and there are political considerations that weigh against simply rubber-stamping the CITT’s decision. Indeed, the Canadian government waited several months to act on the steel safeguard recommendations and ultimately decided against imposing duties.

The imposition of duties in market disruption cases is even more politically unpalatable for the Canadian government. While there is a strong political motivation to protect Canadian manufacturing, Canada is also eager to cultivate its trading relationship with China.

Conclusion

CITT’s willingness to recommend duties in safeguard and market disruption inquiries will encourage more complaints by Canadian industry and create challenges for Chinese manufacturers and Canadian importers. Canada’s competing interests in implementing those recommendations, however, provide importers a final opportunity to press the Canadian government for a decision that truly reflects the interests of all Canadians, including consumers.

Ontario Concludes Successful Trade Mission to China

Article by Navin Joneja, ©2005, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The Government of Ontario recently concluded a successful trade mission to Beijing, Shanghai, Suzhou, Nanjing and Honk Kong, China. The 12-day trade mission included representatives from not only the Provincial Government of Ontario, but also from approximately 100 organizations from the private sector, universities and colleges, municipalities, agricultural organizations and medical research institutions.

The Trade Mission by the Government of Ontario and accompanying representatives comes on the heels of a similar mission conducted by the Government of Quebec earlier this fall from September 21 to 29, 2005. In January of 2005, the federal Government of Canada embarked on its own trade mission to China, identifying the following "priority sectors" for future development: Aerospace; Agri-food; Biotechnology; Education; Financial Services; Information and Communication Technologies; Natural Resources; and Tourism and Transportation.

The Ontario Trade Mission focused on themes such as education, innovation and investment, and resulted in the signing of more than 30 memoranda of understanding (MOUs) and agreements between delegation members and Chinese partners on a host of projects designed to further strengthen the economic foundation of both jurisdictions. Other highlights of Ontario’s Trade Mission included: the renewal of Ontario’s 20-year-old friendship and co-operation agreement with Jiangsu Province, including the formation of a new Business Council; meetings between Premier Dalton McGuinty with top Chinese government officials; and a successful series of roundtables and seminars matching Ontario organizations with over 600 potential partners.

The Government of Ontario’s Trade Mission reflects the growth in trade and investment experienced between China and Ontario. For example, international trade between Ontario and China has been growing steadily for the past number of years, particularly Ontario’s imports of Chinese goods. Ontario’s exports to China increased from just under $1 million in 2000 to $1.3 million in 2004. Ontario’s imports from China grew from approximately $5.5 million in 2000 to nearly $12.5 million in 2004. Outside of the United States, China is the largest country of origin of imports into Ontario and is the second largest destination for Ontario goods.

The fact that each of the Federal Government, and the Provincial Ontario and Quebec Governments sent their own trade missions to China this past year also demonstrates the opportunities for increased trade and investment the business community in Canada sees emerging.

Notwithstanding such optimism, however, there have also been a number of potential roadblocks in recent years to international trade and investment between Canada and China. For instance, over the past few years, there has been an increasing number of trade remedy actions (e.g., antidumping suits, safeguard investigations, etc.) brought by Canadian domestic producers against imports from China. For example, Canadian producers have recently sought to impose duties on imports from China of goods as varied as: outdoor barbeques; steel fuel tanks; certain fasteners (e.g., nuts, bolts, etc.); laminate flooring; and wood venetian blinds.

In addition, earlier this year, several federal politicians in Canada openly questioned the Canadian economy’s growing appetite for investment from China going so far as to seek amendments to the Investment Canada Act, in large part to counter a wave of foreign investment from China.

Ontario’s Premier Dalton McGuinty, however, made it clear to both Canadian delegates and Chinese representatives that Ontario is "open for business," remarking that "Ontario is open to China and Ontario is aggressively pursuing greater two-way trade and investment."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions