Canada: IP Year In Review – Copyright

Last Updated: December 20 2005

Article by Antonio Turco, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Intellectual Property, December 2005.

2005 was another interesting year for copyright law in Canada. The year brought the promise of proposed amendments to the Copyright Act and a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal related to music file sharing. As well, the Supreme Court of Canada is hearing an appeal in a case involving electronic publishing.

Legislative Developments

Bill C-60. In June, the Federal government introduced Bill C-60, under the title An Act to Amend the Copyright Act. Bill C-60 embodied many of the proposed amendments identified in the Government Statement on Proposals for Copyright Reform and claims to fulfill the Canadian Government’s commitment to address short-term copyright reform issues (see Copyright Reform Legislation Introduced, Blakes Bulletin on Intellectual Property, October 2005). Bill C-60 is the first in what is likely to be a series of bills amending and updating the Copyright Act (the Act). The last time the Act underwent significant amendment was in 1997, a time when rapid changes in technologies made clear directions difficult, if not impossible, to predict.

With the dissolution of Parliament, Bill C-60 died on the order paper. A federal election will take place in January. At this time, it is impossible to predict the effect the outcome of the election will have on the future of copyright law reform in Canada.

In a 2002 report, the Government itemized short, medium and long-term issues on its copyright agenda. Medium term issues included remedies, rights in visual and audio-visual works, Crown copyright, collective rights management, term, the ephemeral recording exception and the private copying regime. Longer term issues included traditional knowledge, database protection, audio-visual performers’ rights, and signal rights for broadcasters. Bill C-60, dealing with most of the short term issues, is seen as an attempt to reflect the Government’s commitment to balance and account for the public interest in access to and use of creative works.

Also central to Bill C-60 are two World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) treaties: the WIPO Copyright Treaty and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, which address copyright issues and the Internet. The treaties establish copyright protections for authors, sound recording makers, and performers of audio works. Canada signed the treaties in 1997, but cannot ratify them without amendments to the Act.

Portions of Bill C-60 were intended to address the challenges of digital technology by implementing the provisions of the WIPO treaties. In particular, rights holders would be given a variety of new rights. Many rights holders would have the sole right to control the making available of their copyrighted material on the Internet. Bill C-60 also placed an express limitation on the scope of the private copying exemption, by providing that private copies of sound recordings cannot be uploaded to the Internet or further distributed.

Bill C-60 also introduced provisions dealing with the circumvention of technological protection measures (TPMs), such as encryption, and the alteration or removal of rights management information (RMI), which identifies content protected by copyright, or its author/maker, and the terms and conditions of its use. However, these acts would only attract liability when done to further or to conceal copyright infringement.

Bill C-60 would exempt Internet service providers (ISPs) from liability for copyright material circulating on their networks for which they act purely as intermediaries. In addition, caching of electronic information by ISPs, done for efficiency purposes, would not itself constitute infringement. These provisions incorporate the conclusions of the Supreme Court of Canada in its 2004 SOCAN decision (see Copyright Law and the Internet – The Tariff 22 Case, Blakes Bulletin on Information Technology, July 2004). Liability would remain with those persons, including ISPs, who post or transmit copyrighted material without authorization. ISPs would potentially play a significant role in curbing infringing activities by virtue of the proposed “notice and notice” regime, under which an ISP would be required to forward any notice it receives from a copyright owner to a subscriber who is alleged to be engaged in infringing activities online. The ISP would also be required to retain, for a period of up to six months, information sufficient to identify the subscriber in question. This is in contrast to the “notice and takedown” regime implemented in the United States under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Additionally, Bill C-60 aims to facilitate the use of digital technologies for educational and research purposes. Specifically, educational institutions would be permitted to use the Internet to deliver certain copyright protected material, for example, lectures and licensed teaching material, electronically, provided that appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent the unauthorized transmission of works.

Performers would also be given additional rights, such as rights over fixation, communication by telecommunication, public performance, and rental. Moral rights protection would be extended to performers’ performances.

The copyright bundle of rights would be expanded by the inclusion of a “first sale” right over any tangible, material form of a work.

Photographs have historically been treated quite differently from other copyright works. Ownership of copyright resides in the person commissioning (for valuable consideration) the original, rather than the author, even without a written assignment. The term of protection is a fixed time running from creation (rather than from the death of the author), for photographs owned by any corporation in which the author does not have voting control. Bill C-60 would eliminate these distinctions.

While Bill C-60 proposed a number of amendments to the Act, it is significant to note that it did not address several key issues that were covered in the government’s May 2004 report. The government had planned to release a consultation paper to deal with the issues that were not covered in Bill C-60.

Significant Decisions

Music File Sharing. In BMG Canada Inc. v. John Doe, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned a decision of the Federal Court which had served as a legal barrier to lawsuits proposed by members of the Canadian Recording Industry Association related to the peer-to-peer file sharing of copyrighted music. The issue before the Court was a motion by the plaintiffs for an order requiring certain ISPs to disclose the identity of their customers alleged to be liable for copyright infringement. The plaintiffs could not continue with their action because they could not identify the alleged infringers, who operated under pseudonyms on the Internet.

In his decision, the motions judge made four crucial findings that the Court of Appeal was required to consider:

One. Existing Canadian copyright law was insufficient to permit the recording industry to sue the alleged infringers.

Two. The privacy rights of the alleged infringers trumped any copyright interest of the part of the copyright owners.

Three. The recording industry was required to establish a prima facie case of copyright infringement.

Four. Certain key pieces of evidence were hearsay and, therefore, inadmissible.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the plaintiffs, finding that the evidence on the record was defective. However, it did so without prejudice to the plaintiffs' right to commence a further application for disclosure of the identity of the alleged infringers and effectively set out a road map for the plaintiffs to follow to do so.

In rendering its decision, the Court of Appeal expressly addressed the conclusions of the motions judge related to substantive copyright law. The motions judge held that, with reference to subsection 80(1) of the Act, downloading a song for personal use does not amount to infringement. He also said that placing personal copies of songs onto shared directories, such that the songs were accessible by other computer users over the Internet, did not amount to authorization or distribution contrary to the Act. He found no difference between the activities of the alleged infringers placing a copy of a song in a shared directory linked to a peer-to-peer service and a library placing a photocopier in a room with copyrighted material. The motions judge felt that the mere act of placing a copy of a song on a shared directory, without some other positive act, did not amount to distribution. Such acts, in his view, did not result in secondary infringement unless there was evidence of knowledge on the part of the alleged infringer.

The Court of Appeal said that conclusions related to copyright infringement should not be reached at a preliminary stage of an action, without the benefit of a full evidentiary record. The Court of Appeal held that the danger in reaching such conclusions at the preliminary stages of an action without the availability of evidence, nor consideration of all applicable legal principles, are obvious. For example, the motions judge did not consider all the requirements of the private copying exception. Similarly, he did not consider whether the users' act of copying songs onto their shared directory could constitute authorization because it invited and permitted other persons with Internet access to have the musical works communicated to them and be copied by them.

Having noted the dangers of rendering legal conclusions at the preliminary stage, the Court of Appeal made it clear that, were this case to proceed further, it should be done on the basis that no findings on the issue of infringement have been made to date.

Future Decisions in the Supreme Court of Canada

Electronic Publishing. The Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear an appeal from the decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Heather Robertson v. The Thomson Corporation (see Ontario Court of Appeal Examines Right of Freelance Authors, Blakes Bulletin on Information Technology, November 2004). Ms Robertson is a freelancer who wrote two articles that were published in a national newspaper. One, a book excerpt, was the subject of a written agreement between the newspaper and her publisher; the other, a book review, was written under an oral agreement. Copyright was not addressed in either agreement. The newspaper publisher placed the articles in online databases. Ms Robertson argues that, by doing so, the newspaper infringed her copyright.

The action was certified as a class action, with the class consisting of all freelance contributors to the newspaper other than those who died on or before December 31, 1942. Ms Robertson brought a motion for partial summary judgment and an injunction restraining the use of her works in the databases, on the basis that the reproduction of her articles in the databases did not fall within the newspaper’s copyright in the collective work and infringed her copyright. The application for partial summary judgment was dismissed by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, which found that genuine issues remained for trial. The Court of Appeal dismissed both an appeal and a cross-appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada will now decide the issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.