Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Imposes Common Law Duty Of Honest Performance On Contracting Parties

In Bhasin v Hrynew, (2014, SCC 71), a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the Canadian common law should now impose a duty on parties to perform their contractual obligations honestly. The ruling is significant as it was previously unclear in the Canadian common law the role of the duty of good faith. The articulation of an overarching duty of good faith, as well as the requirement that contracting parties be honest with each other in relation to the performance of their contractual obligations, will have noteworthy effects for contracting parties Canada-wide.

The Facts

The Appellant Harish Bhasin, ("Mr. Bhasin") was an enrollment director for Canadian American Financial Corp. ("Can-Am") since 1989. Can-Am markets education savings plans to investors using enrollment directors like Mr. Bhasin. During his employment with Can-Am, Mr. Bhasin was very successful, building his own sales force over the course of ten years, and winning several "top enrollment director" awards with the company.

An enrollment director's agreement (the "Agreement") from 1998, governed the relationship between Can-Am and Mr. Bhasin. The Agreement term was for three years, and upon expiry of such, the Agreement would automatically renew at the end of the three-year term unless one of the parties gave six months' written notice to the contrary or there was misconduct or cause.

Another enrollment director with Can-Am, Mr. Hrynew, had significant acrimony with Mr. Bhasin, and through the course of the litigation, it became clear that Mr. Hrynew's main goal had been to capture Mr. Bhasin's lucrative business.

In 1999, due to concerns about compliance issues among enrollment directors, the Securities Commission required Can-Am to appoint a single provincial trading officer ("PTO") to review its enrollment directors to check for compliance with securities laws. Mr. Hrynew was appointed to that position by Can-Am, and part of his duties was to audit the other directors, including Mr. Bhasin. Due to mutual hostility between Mr. Bhasin and Mr. Hrynew, and the suspicion that Mr. Hrynew was trying to take over his business, Mr. Bhasin refused to allow Mr. Hrynew to audit him.

The Court found that Can-Am lied to Mr. Bhasin by telling him that Mr. Hrynew was under an obligation to treat information confidentially, and that the Securities commission had rejected the option of having an outsider to the company be the PTO. Neither of these representations were true.

It was also clear to the Court that Can-Am wanted to re-structure its Alberta agencies, and in 2000 the company outlined to the Security Commission a plan that would lead to Mr. Bhasin working for Mr. Hrynew. Again, Mr. Bhasin was unaware of this restructuring plan, and when he eventually asked about a "merger" at a meeting, Can-Am replied that it was not a "done deal" even though the plan to merge the businesses was already in motion.

Ultimately, as a result of refusing to let Mr. Hrynew audit him, Can-Am threatened to terminate the Agreement, and in May 2001, gave Mr. Bhasin notice on non-renewal under the Agreement. The Trial Judge concluded that Can-Am had exercised the non-renewal clause in a dishonest manner, and for the improper purpose of forcing a merger between Mr. Bhasin and Mr. Hrynew's businesses. Due to this non-renewal of the Agreement, Mr. Bhasin lost the value of his business in his assembled workforce, and the majority of his sales agents was solicited by Mr. Hrynew.

In a conclusion as to the conduct of Can-Am, Cromwell J. stated at para 30, "it repeatedly lied to him about the nature of the organizational changes required by the Alberta Securities Commission, the nature of the audits that were to be carried out by Mr. Hrynew, and was dishonest about its intention to force him out."

At the Trial level, the Court concluded that it was an implied term of the contract that the decision to renew the contract be made in good faith, and that Can-Am had breached this implied term. In support of that finding, Mr. Bhasin argued that there should be a recognized general duty of good faith in contract, as well as a duty of honest performance of contractual obligations.

Clarification of the Common Law Duty of Good Faith

Although the duty of good faith is found in numerous places in Canadian law, namely employment contracts, tendering contracts, franchise agreements, insurance contracts, and through specific statutes requiring good faith, the general common law duty was found by the Court to be "unsettled and piecemeal". As such, the Supreme Court undertook to outline what the common law duty of good faith should be:

[33] The first step is to acknowledge that good faith contractual performance is a general organizing principle of the common law of contract that underpins and informs the various rules in which the common law, in various situations and types of relationships, recognizes obligations of good faith contractual performance. The second is to recognize, as a further manifestation of this organizing principle of good faith, that there is a common law duty which applies to all contracts to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations.

In explanation of how this general duty will operate, Cromwell J. clarified the following:

  • The duty of good faith is not its own doctrine or free-standing rule, and instead is a requirement of justice which underpins more specific legal doctrines;
  • A claim of good faith is more likely to succeed if it falls within the kinds of situations or relationships where the law already requires some level of honest, candid and forthright contractual performance. However, the list of circumstances where good faith is already required is not closed, leaving it open to argue for the duty to apply in new circumstances;
  • A contracting party should have "appropriate regard" to the legitimate contractual interests of another contracting party, with the meaning of "appropriate regard" varying depending on the contractual context;
  • This general duty of good faith does not require one contractual party to serve the other parties contractual interests in all cases; "it merely requires that a party not seek to undermine those interests in bad faith" (at para 65); and
  • The duty of good faith does not engage any kind of fiduciary duty.

The Court also introduced a new duty of honest performance. Existing under the main umbrella of the duty of good faith, there is a general duty of honesty in contractual performance which is a requirement of a party not to lie or mislead the other party about their contractual performance. This general duty of honesty is not an implied term but "a general doctrine of contract law that imposes as a contractual duty a minimum standard of honest contractual performance" (at para 74). Lastly, it is important to note that Cromwell J. noted that an entire agreement clause cannot oust the duty, however express contractual provisions may be able "relax the requirements of the doctrine" (at para 77).

In summation of the common law duty of good faith and honest performance, Cromwell J. outlined at para 93:

  1. there is a general organizing principle of good faith that underlies many facets of contract law;
  2. in general, the particular implications of the broad principle for particular cases are determined by resorting to the body of doctrine that has developed which gives effect to aspects of that principle in particular types of situations and relationships;
  3. it is appropriate to recognize a new common law duty that applies to all contracts as a manifestation of the general organizing principle of good faith; a duty of honest performance, which requires the parties to be honest with each other in relation to the performance of their contractual obligations.

Significant Damages Awarded for Breach of Duty of Honest Performance

As the Trial Judge concluded that Can-Am acted dishonestly towards Mr. Bhasin, Cromwell J. easily concluded that Can-Am breached their duty to perform the contract honestly. Specifically, Can-Am failed to act honestly with Mr. Bhasin in regards to the exercise of the non-renewal, and throughout the period leading up to the non-renewal and termination when Can-Am lied about the restructuring and the requirements of having Mr. Hrynew as the PTO. Such dishonestly was a breach of the Agreement, which ultimately led to the destruction of Mr. Bhasin's business.

Damages were calculated on the basis of what Mr. Bhasin's economic position would have been if Can-Am fulfilled their duty of honest performance. It was estimated that $87,000 would represent the value of the business around the time of non-renewal, and the Court awarded damages in that amount to Mr. Bhasin.

Understanding the Principle of Good Faith in Contract Law

The recognition of the "organizing principle" of good faith, as well as the general duty of honest performance, will undoubtedly affect the performance of contractual obligations moving forward. Contracting parties should be cognizant of the fact that they now have the explicit obligation not to lie or mislead another party about their contractual performance. In the decision, the behaviour by Can-Am resulted in a breach of this duty of honest performance, and ultimately the award of damages against them.

While it is not the case that one contracting party must do everything in their power to serve the other contracting party's interests, a party should have "appropriate regard" to the legitimate contractual interests of the other party, and not act in bad faith to undercut those interests. Parties who knowingly mislead another contracting party may be liable for damages and should be appreciative of their duties throughout their participation in performing their contractual obligations. Should parties wish to diminish the effect the duty of honest performance has on their contract, and correspondingly set out required standards of performance, the limitation or modification of they duty must be done through express provisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Singleton Urquhart Reynolds Vogel LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions