Canada: Law Society Tells Lawyers: Stop Snitching

Last Updated: December 16 2014
Article by Ian Richler

Let's say you're retained by a nice young couple whose home has been impacted by a spill at the gas station next door. Is it unethical to send a demand letter to the gas station saying, clean up my clients' property or else I'll ask the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change ("MOE") to issue an order?

Most environmental lawyers would probably say no. The tactic is not uncommon. And it is hard to see anything improper about it. If a lawyer believes approaching the MOE would be a more expedient way of getting the gas station to clean up the problem than launching an expensive and lengthy civil claim, why shouldn't the lawyer be free to write the demand letter?

Alas, recent amendments to the Law Society of Upper Canada's Rules of Professional Conduct should make us all think hard about whether that intuition is correct.

On October 1, 2014 the new Rules of Professional Conduct came into force. The new rules largely adopt the most recent Model Code of Professional Conduct developed by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada.

The former rule against threatening criminal or quasi-criminal proceedings to gain a benefit for a client has been broadened. Now threatening to make a complaint to a "regulatory authority" is prohibited as well. Curiously, it is the threat of a complaint, not the complaint itself, that is proscribed. (The full text of the new rule and commentary is set out in the appendix to this article.1)

There is an exception to the new rule: it "does not apply to an application made in good faith to a regulatory authority for a benefit to which a client may be legally entitled".2 The commentary below the rule explains the exception as follows:

Where a regulatory authority exercises a jurisdiction that is essentially civil, it is not improper to threaten to make a complaint pursuant to that authority to achieve a benefit for the client. For example, where the regulatory authority of the office dealing with employment standards covers non-payment of wages, it is not improper to threaten to make a complaint pursuant to the relevant provincial statute for an order that wages be paid failing payment of unpaid wages.

What does this mean for you in your hypothetical gas station case? Is asking the MOE to intervene merely an "application" for a "benefit" to which your client "may be legally entitled"? Possibly. But it seems that such an interpretation puts some strain on the ordinary meaning of those terms. There is certainly no MOE "application" form that can be filled out to request an order.3 And the order itself is not exactly a "benefit" that your client is "entitled" to in the same sense that an employee is entitled to unpaid wages. The issuance of an order is a matter of discretion on the part of the MOE – even where there are statutory grounds for an order, the MOE may decide not to issue one. 4

Moreover, it is debatable whether the MOE is a regulatory authority that "exercises a jurisdiction that is essentially civil" within the meaning of the commentary. In the sense that "civil" jurisdiction contrasts with criminal or quasi-criminal jurisdiction, then yes, the issuance of a cleanup order can be characterized as a civil matter. But is that really the sense the term was meant to connote? After all, if the rule against threatening proceedings were meant to be confined to threatening criminal or quasi-criminal proceedings, the old rule would have done the trick. It seems, rather, that the very purpose of the amendment was to capture threats to complain to regulatory authorities with a mandate that is not strictly penal.

Further complicating the analysis is the fact that the MOE wears more than one hat. In addition to its order-making jurisdiction, which may or may not be characterized as "civil", it also has the power to lay charges, which is clearly criminal or quasi-criminal. To return to the gas station example, the spill might give rise to a cleanup order or a prosecution for an unlawful discharge,5 or both. The lawyer advising the MOE of the contamination cannot control which if any of those tools the MOE will pick. If threatening the gas station with an MOE prosecution is clearly improper, why should threatening the gas station to notify the MOE of the mere facts of the spill – which could foreseeably lead to a prosecution – be any better?

All this is to say that the scope of the new rule is uncertain. The commentary, with its confusing reference to regulatory authorities with an "essentially civil" mandate, clouds more than clarifies.

It is not immediately obvious what problem the new rule is trying to solve. The old rule against threatening criminal proceedings seems to have been derived largely from concerns about abuse of process. As noted by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. LeRoux [1928] 3 D.L.R. 688, "The criminal law was not enacted for the assistance of persons seeking to collect civil debts." 6 But complaints to a regulatory authority do not always trigger the same alarms.

The MOE's mandate, after all, clearly includes the protection of the property and health of spill victims such as the nice young couple in our hypothetical scenario. 7 Asking the MOE to fulfill its statutory mandate in such circumstances can hardly be characterized as an abuse of process. Threatening the polluter with making such a bona fide request just seems like good advocacy. By contrast, it would surely be improper – and quite possibly criminal8 – to threaten to go to the MOE to obtain an advantage for a client in an unrelated matter. A lawyer can't say, I will ask the MOE to issue a cleanup order against you unless you hire my client's nephew.

Unfortunately the new rule does not distinguish clearly between threats to ask a regulatory authority to exercise its powers in accordance with its statutory mandate for a legitimate purpose, and threats to use a regulatory process for collateral or ulterior motives. It therefore seems overbroad. Even threats that are not frivolous and would not result in an abuse of process risk being captured by the rule.

So should you write the demand letter to the gas station or not? I wouldn't. On the face of the new rule, threatening to ask the MOE to issue a cleanup order sounds like a threat to complain to a regulatory authority, and although there is a reasonable argument that it falls under the exemption as a good faith request for a benefit, the argument is far from watertight. Unless the rule is clarified by the Law Society, writing the letter seems like a big risk to be taking on personally.

Footnotes

1 The former rule 2.02(4) stated: "A lawyer shall not advise, threaten, or bring a criminal or quasi-criminal prosecution in order to secure a civil advantage for the client". It should also be noted that apart from the Law Society rules, there is a rule in the Canadian Bar Association's Code of Professional Conduct against threatening or bringing a criminal, quasi-criminal or disciplinary proceeding in order to secure a civil advantage for a client: Chapter III, rule 9. The CBA rule does not refer to complaints to a regulatory authority.

2 Rule 3.2-5.1. This exception does not appear in the Federation of Law Societies of Canada's Model Code of Professional Conduct; it was added by the Law Society of Upper Canada. 

3 There is, however, a form that can be submitted to the Environmental Commissioner of Ontario to request an investigation into an alleged environmental contravention pursuant to section 74 the Environmental Bill of Rights.

4 For example, sections 17 and 18 of the Environmental Protection Act use the permissive "may" rather than the mandatory "shall" – the MOE may issue an order under those provisions but is not required to do so.

5 For example, under section 14 of the Environmental Protection Act.

6 The case is cited in a bulletin entitled "Criminal Law may not be Used to Collect Civil Debts" in the Law Society of Upper Canada Gazette (Vol. II, No. 4), December 1968. See also Wilson v. Law Society of British Columbia (1986), 33 DLR (4th) 572, where the British Columbia Court of Appeal, referring to the rule against threatening criminal proceedings, said, "The purpose of the rule is to prevent the criminal law from being used as a lever to enforce the payment of a civil claim". 

7 For example, section 17 of the Environmental Protection Act authorizes the MOE to order a polluter, inter alia, to repair or prevent any injury or damage to property or human health or safety resulting from the discharge.

8 See section 346 of the Criminal Code (extortion). Note that there is an exemption from the extortion provision for threats to institute civil proceedings, but no such exemption for threats to make a complaint to a regulatory authority.

This article was first published by the Environmental Law Section of the Ontario Bar Association on Oct. 22, 2014.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions