Canada: Cross-Examining An Expert Part I

Last Updated: December 8 2014
Article by Richard M. Wise

Cross-examination is such a critical part in the trial process that entire books have been devoted to the subject, providing important advice and guidance.

In preparing this article, I have culled material from selected writings of two prominent Canadian trial lawyers and two American litigators, particularly that with respect to expert witnesses.

The Canadian authors are former Supreme Court Justice John Sopinka, in The Trial of An Action (1981), written when he was a practising litigator, and Ontario District Court Judge Roger Salhany, in Cross-Examination: The Art of the Advocate (1991).

The American authors are Francis Wellman, a 19th century trial lawyer whose celebrated 475-page classic is The Art of Cross-Examination (1903), and Peter Brown, who wrote The Art of Questioning: Thirty Maxims of Cross-Examination (1988).

The books provide informative and colourful insight into these cross-examiners' strategies and thought processes.

Sopinka states that a witness' evidence can be contradicted or impeached by (a) previous inconsistent statements, (b) other evidence, (c) contradiction in the witness' own evidence or inherent improbabilities therein, or (d) attacking his or her memory, power of observation and credibility. However, in cross-examining an expert witness (as opposed to a fact witness), Sopinka suggests the following:

  • Be schooled by an equally competent expert.
  • Flaw the opposing expert so that your expert is preferred.
  • Discredit the expert's opinion by refuting a basic assumed or found fact.
  • If a basic assumption or fact cannot be refuted, attack the expert's theory [relying upon your own expert].

Salhany emphasizes that the cross-examiner must fully understand the nature and effect of the expert testimony so that it can effectively be attacked. "Some cross-examiners will plunge into a cross-examination of the expert, without assessing whether the witness has hurt his case or not." He quotes John Henry Wigmore, author of the leading American text, Wigmore on Evidence (1904): "Crossexamination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth". However, Wigmore qualifies this by saying: "You can do anything with a bayonet except sit on it. A lawyer can do anything with cross-examination if he is skilful enough not to impale his own cause upon it." Salhany continues, "If [the expert's] evidence has hurt you then zero in on the specific issue that you wish to challenge. Don't start off by attacking his credentials and expertise unless it is necessary".

Sopinka states that while there are many styles and techniques of cross-examination, it must serve at least to:

  • obtain helpful admissions or evidence.
  • contradict or impeach the witness.
  • create an impression or atmosphere for the judge or jury.

However, counsel must first decide whether to even cross-examine, and, if so, what it would accomplish ... and whether, by not cross-examining, it will imply to the court that the expert's evidence is accepted.

Wellman suggests that nothing could be more absurd or a greater waste of time than cross-examining a witness who has testified to no material fact against the lawyer's case. He observes that many trial lawyers seem to feel it is their duty to cross-examine every witness who is sworn; they appear to be afraid that if they do not cross-examine, their client will suspect them of ignorance or inability to conduct a trial.

Brown gives the following advice:

"... the early masters understood better than today's professors the importance of foregoing cross-examination and the stupidity of having an adverse witness repeat and thus reinforce all that was said so damagingly on direct ... .

"More cross-examinations are suicidal than homicidal. When in doubt don't ask a question. When in doubt don't cross-examine. Do only what's necessary, and then get the hell out".

He refers to the comments of another celebrated early 20th century American trial lawyer, Max Steuer, who had 40 years of experience as a cross-examiner:

"... cross-examination should be pointed to two objectives: either to destroy the story told by the witness or to destroy the witness himself. If neither of these objectives is attainable (and if you have properly prepared your case, you should know the prospect) a pointless and scoreless cross-examination does your case more harm than good. And when you have scored your point on cross-examination, for heaven's sake, quit."

Salhany says:

"... Properly conducted, cross examination is the best method for testing the value of human statements. Badly conducted, it can destroy one's own cause.

"Cross-examination should strive to achieve two goals. The first is to weaken the case for the other side by discrediting the testimony of the witness in chief. The second is to elicit evidence from the witness which will establish facts favourable to the cross-examiner's side. Those goals are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Often in seeking to achieve one, the cross-examiner may be successful in achieving the other."

Rules for The Cross-Examiner

The principal "rules" that the cross-examiner should follow are summarized in the remainder of this article.

1. Size-up your witness.

Salhany categorizes witnesses under various headings, including:

  • The brilliant witness, and
  • The garrulous witness.

Each of his witness categories requires a special approach by the cross-examiner in attempting to attack the testimony.

2. Begin the cross-examination dramatically.

Sopinka believes that the best technique is a dramatic beginning: This is when counsel has the attention of the judge and when the witness is most vulnerable. Counsel should not permit the witness to become acclimatized and gain confidence; rather, put to the witness an early series of questions that go to the heart of the matter.

3. Don't ask a question in a courtroom context without knowing the answer first.

Sopinka notes that while this is a general rule, there can be exceptions:

"The truth lies in between. In a strong case, not dependent on cross-examination, the crossexaminer should take no chances. He should restrict his questions to matters that are either not capable of doing damage or in respect of which the witness is constrained by previous statements. But in a case that depends on cross-examination this approach is too stultifying. The cross-examination must be built up on probabilities. The cross-examiner tries to foresee the different answers that may be given and formulates questions to meet them. ... ."

4. Don't ask why.

Brown believes that the only times when you can ask "why" in cross-examination is when the adverse witness is inextricably "impaled" or if counsel's pre-trial examination-for-discovery and other testimony has made him/her aware of facts that the opposing party simply cannot explain away. In this latter context the question "why" is rhetorical and the witness' silence tells the tale.

Once the witness/evidence has been discredited, don't ask more questions. If cross-examining counsel continues to ask more questions, the witness may be afforded an opportunity of explaining away prior admissions. Similarly, counsel should not over-stress, as this may provide the witness an opportunity of qualifying his or her answer or shrewdly placing the matter in another context. As Brown notes, "you will have plenty of opportunities to emphasize the damaging admission or testimony in summation to the ... ."

5. Don't ask open-ended questions.

Brown suggests that counsel's questions should be short, definite, clear, pithy, without characterization and close-ended. Counsel should not ask general questions that the witness can answer with a speech. This would give the hostile witness a chance to bring in testimony otherwise inadmissible and self-serving. Counsel must control the opposing witness on crossexamination or the witness will destroy the questioner and, in turn, the client's cause. For the hostile witness, leading questions (permitted in cross-examination but not in direct) or close-ended questions are those that call for a "yes" or "no" response such as "Isn't it correct ... ?". In fact, all questions in critical areas should be close-ended. By carefully limiting the answers, counsel can successfully preclude the expert from expounding on his/her theories and reasserting his/her opinions and explanations. Counsel may even succeed in planting seeds of doubt in the court's mind about the expertise of the witness.

6. Don't put the evidence of your own expert to the expert you are cross-examining.

Sopinka says any direct reference to counsel's own expert should be limited to only an admission (which will normally be forthcoming) by the opposing expert on the witness stand that counsel's own expert is well-qualified and highly regarded: "While much of the substance of your expert's theory will be put to the witness, a specific identification of your expert's evidence in the question may result in getting a rebuttal in advance".

In Part II, I summarize the authors' additional rules for cross-examining an expert.

Originally published by The Montreal Lawyer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions