Canada: "Be Honest": Supreme Court Of Canada Recognizes The Duty Of Honest Contractual Performance

Last Updated: November 17 2014
Article by Marco P. Falco

The Supreme Court of Canada has held that the common law imposes a duty on parties to a contract to perform their obligations honestly.

In Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, per Cromwell J., the appellant, Mr. Bhasin, started an action after his relationship with Canadian American Financial Corp. ("Can-Am") soured. Ultimately, Can-Am refused to renew the dealership agreement it had with Mr. Bhasin.

Mr. Bhasin had acted as an enrollment director for Can-Am, which was in the business of marking education savings plans to investors ("ESPs"). Like all other enrollment directors associated with Can-Am, Mr. Bhasin acted like a small business owner.

The relationship between Mr. Bhasin and Can-Am was governed by a 1998 commercial dealership agreement (the "Agreement"), which was not a franchise agreement, but included aspects of a franchise agreement, such as the fact that Mr. Bhasin was required to sell only Can- Am investment products and owed Can-Am a fiduciary duty. Critically, the Agreement provided that the contract would automatically renew at the end of the three-year term unless one of the parties gave six months' written notice to the contrary.

Another enrollment director, the respondent Mr. Hrynew, was a competitor of Mr. Bhasin. According to the evidence at trial, Mr. Hrynew attempted to convince Can-Am not to renew its Agreement with Mr. Bhasin. In particular, Mr. Hyrnew wanted to capture the market created by Mr. Bhasin's efforts. Mr. Hrynew proposed a merger with Mr. Bhasin, which Mr. Bhasin repeatedly rejected.

In or about 1999, the Alberta Securities Commission raised compliance concerns with respect to Can-Am's enrollment directors. The Commission required Can- Am to appoint a single provincial trading office ("PTO") to review its enrollment directors for compliance with securities laws. Can-Am appointed Mr. Hrynew to that position, which required Mr. Hrynew to review Mr. Bhasin's confidential business records. Mr. Bhasin objected to Mr. Hrynew, as his competitor, having access to that information. Despite Mr. Bhasin's concerns, Can-Am repeatedly misled Mr. Bhasin by advising him that, as a PTO, Mr. Hrynew had to treat all information he received confidentially. Can-Am further lied to Mr. Bhasin and told him that the Commission had rejected a proposal to appoint a third-party PTO. Further, Can-Am did not give Mr. Bhasin a straight-forward response when Mr. Bhasin asked in August, 2000 if a merger between his and Mr. Hrynew's business was a "done deal". When Mr. Bhasin refused to allow Mr. Hrynew to conduct an audit of his business, Can-Am threatened to terminate the Agreement between them. In May 2001, Can-Am eventually gave notice of non-renewal under the Agreement. At the end of the contract, Mr. Bhasin lost the value of his business in his workforce and Mr. Hrynew had solicited most of Mr. Bhasin's sales agents. Mr. Bhasin brought an action against Mr. Hrynew and Can-Am.

The trial judge of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench held that Can-Am had breached an implied term of good faith in its dealings with Mr. Bhasin. It held that Can-Am had acted dishonestly with Mr. Bhasin in the period leading to the non-renewal of its Agreement. The trial judge therefore found that Can-Am was in breach of the implied term of good faith, Mr. Hrynew had induced the breach of contract, and both respondents were liable for civil conspiracy. The Alberta Court of Appeal allowed the respondents' appeal and dismissed Mr. Bhasin's action. It held that the trial judge had erred by implying a term of good faith conduct where there was an unambiguous contract that included an entire agreement clause.

On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, Justice Cromwell held that there was no liability for inducing breach of contract and for unlawful means conspiracy; the action against Mr. Hrynew was therefore dismissed. However, the Court held that Can-Am breached the Agreement it had with Mr. Bhasin when it failed to act honestly with Mr. Bhasin in exercising the non-renewal clause. In so doing, the Court recognized and established a duty on the part of contracting parties to engage in honest contractual performance.

The Supreme Court of Canada's analysis is guided by three broad principles, which are summarized at paragraph 93 of the decision. They are as follows:

1. "Good faith" is a "general organizing principle" that underlies many facets of contract law.

According to the Court, good faith has deep roots in contract law and "permeates many of its rules". However, at common law, Courts have generally resisted acknowledging an independent doctrine of good faith performance of contracts. In particular, Canadian common law with respect to the good faith performance of contracts was described by the Court as "piecemeal, unsettled and unclear". Therefore, the Court held that it was time to recognize that good faith contractual performance is a "general organizing principle" at common law, "which underpins and informs the various rules in which the common law, in various situations and types of relationships, recognizes obligations of good faith contractual performance". An organizing principle, such as the duty of good faith, states in general terms a requirement of justice from which more specific legal doctrines may be derived.

strong>2. In general, the particular implications of the broad principle for particular cases are determined by resorting to the body of doctrine that has developed which gives effect to aspects of that principle in particular types of situations and relationships. Good faith can be used in a range of contexts. The Court noted that this calls for a highly context-specific understanding of what honesty and reasonableness in performance require so as to give appropriate consideration to the legitimate interests of both contracting parties. The Court identified existing situations or relationships in which duties of good faith have been found to exist, i.e. the employment or franchise relationship. In this case, Can-Am's conduct did not fit within any of these existing relationships. Accordingly, the Court could not classify Can-Am's non-renewal decision as an exercise of contractual discretion under any of the situations or relationships already identified by the case law.

3. It is appropriate to recognize a new common law duty that applies to all contracts as a manifestation of the general organizing principle of good faith: a duty of honest performance, which requires the parties to be honest with each other in relation to the performance of their contractual obligations.

Based on the analysis above, the Court held that it was time to recognize, as a manifestation of the organizing principle of good faith, a duty at common law which applies to all contracts to act honestly in the performance of contractual obligations. The Court found that recognizing this duty was not contrary to the reasonable expectations of most commercial parties entering into contracts:

Commercial parties reasonably expect a basic level of honesty and good faith in contractual dealings. While they remain at arm's length and are not subject to the duties of a fiduciary, a basic level of honest conduct is necessary to the proper functioning of commerce. The growth of longer term, relational contracts that depend on an element of trust and cooperation clearly call for a basic element of honesty in performance, but, even in transactional exchanges, misleading or deceitful conduct will fly in the face of the expectations of the parties: see Swan and Adamski, at 1.24.

The scope of the duty of honest contractual performance was identified by the Court as follows: parties to a contract must not lie or otherwise knowingly mislead each other about matters directly linked to the performance of the contract. The Court was careful to note that this does not impose a duty of loyalty or of disclosure or even require a party to forgo advantages flowing from the contract. Rather, in the words of the Court, "it is a simple requirement not to lie or mislead the other party about one's contractual performance".

In recognizing this duty, the Court states that it has simply carved out a modest, incremental step in the law of contract. The duty of honest performance has little effect on freedom of contract, "since parties will rarely expect that their contracts permit dishonest performance of their obligations". Moreover, the Court held that the recognition of a duty of honest performance poses no risk to commercial certainty in the law of contract. Reasonable commercial parties expect, at a minimum, that the persons with whom they contract do not act dishonestly.

Notably, the Court held that the duty of honest contractual performance should not be considered an implied term of the contract. Rather, it was a general doctrine of contract law that imposes a contractual duty, regardless of the parties' intentions. The Court compared it to other doctrines which impose limits on freedom of contract, such as the doctrine of unconscionability.

The Court further held that it would not exclude any role for the agreement of the parties in influencing the scope of honest performance in a particular context. That is, parties "should be free in some contexts to relax the requirements of the doctrine so long as they respect its minimum core requirements". However, any alteration to honest performance has to be in express terms; generically-drafted "entire agreement" clauses do not satisfy this requirement.

On the facts, the Supreme Court held that Can-Am breached its duty to perform the Agreement honestly in the exercise of the non-renewal clause. Can-Am appointed Mr. Hrynew as PTO, with the effect that he would audit his competitors' business. Can-Am also wanted to force a merger of Mr. Bhasin's business under Mr. Hrynew's, effectively giving Mr. Bhasin's agency to Mr. Hrynew. It was clear that Can-Am acted dishonestly with Mr. Bhasin throughout the period leading to its exercise of the non-renewal clause. Can-Am's breach of contract consisted of its failure to be honest with Mr. Bhasin with respect to its settled intentions regarding renewal. The Court found Can-Am liable for $87,000 in damages, being the value of Mr. Bhasin's business around the time of non-renewal.

Naturally, the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Bhasin v. Hrynew will have significant implications for the law of contract in years to come. The extent to which lawyers and parties in Canada will test the bounds of a duty of honest contractual performance remains to be seen. The Court sought to strike a balance between ensuring that the duty of honest contractual performance does not amount to an unnecessary burden on freedom of contract, while at the same time recognizing a basic and fundamental ethic of honesty that must underlie all contractual performance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Marco P. Falco
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions