Canada: Can A Political Purpose Also Be A Charitable Purpose? Perspectives On The Impact Of Re Greenpeace Of New Zealand Inc. In Canada

A number of Canadian charities have recently come under scrutiny by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) regarding their charitable status. In Canada, a registered charity pays no income tax and is able to issue tax receipts to its donors. Those receipts are then used for non-refundable tax credits or deductions. The Canadian Press has reported that many registered charities in Canada, ranging from environmental to international aid and human-rights groups, have recently been subjected to political-activity audits by the CRA. The CRA has apparently budgeted approximately $13 million for these audits.1

In this context, we provide some insight into the Canadian law on registration for charitable status in light of a recent Supreme Court of New Zealand decision.

Current Canadian law on political activities and charitable status

Under Canadian law, registered charities are not allowed to have political purposes.

However, subsections 149.1(6.1) and (6.2) of the Income Tax Act (ITA) state that where a corporation, trust, or any other organization devotes substantially all of its resources to charitable purposes, it may also devote a part of its resources to political activities, and continue to meet the definition of charitable foundation or charitable organization, provided that those political activities are ancillary and incidental to its charitable purposes and do not include the direct or indirect support of, or opposition to, any political party or candidate for public office. The CRA interprets "substantially all" in subsections 149.1(6.1) and (6.2) to mean 90% of resources, including financial assets, equipment, premises and human capital.

The Canadian jurisprudence in this area of law was largely established by the Federal Courts in the mid-1980s, inspired by a 1917 decision from House of Lords, Bowman v Secular Society Ltd.2 In Bowman, it was held that, "A trust for the attainment of political objects has always been held invalid." Canadian courts, following Bowman, have adopted a similar position. In 1999, this was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v Canada (Minister of National Revenue).3

The CRA has issued guidance, which does not have force of law, clarifying how the CRA may interpret the ITA provisions. Guidance issued in 2003 provides that, "Any purpose that suggests convincing or needing people to act in a certain way and which is contingent upon a change to law or government policy (for example, 'the abolition of' or 'the total suppression of animal experimentation') is a political purpose."4 This guidance further states that the CRA will presume an activity to be political if a charity:

  • explicitly communicates a call to political action (...)
  • explicitly communicates to the public that the law, policy or decision of any level of government in Canada or a foreign country should be retained (...), opposed, or changed; or
  • explicitly indicates in its materials (...) that the intention of the activity is to incite, or organize to put pressure on, an elected representative or public official to retain, oppose, or change the law, policy, or decision of any level of government in Canada or a foreign country.5

Nearly 10 years later, the CRA issued additional guidance, titled "How to Draft Purposes for Charitable Registration."6 This guidance was intended to provide insight on how the Charities Directorate will determine whether or not a charity has been constituted for charitable purposes. It provides, among other things, that an analysis of an organization's activities and operations may reveal it is furthering an "unstated non-charitable purpose" that is not eligible for registration as a charity under the ITA. To illustrate this point, the CRA specifies that an organization devoting the majority of its resources to "political activities" would be ineligible for charitable registration, because in such case, the organization's purpose would be political rather than charitable.

Recent developments abroad: Re Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc.

In a recent decision,7 Greenpeace New Zealand Inc. sought recognition as a "charitable entity" under the Charities Act 2005 (NZ). The Charities Commission ruled that Greenpeace could not register as a charity because two of its purposes were not charitable: 1) the promotion of disarmament and peace and 2) the promotion of "legislation, policies, rules, regulations and plans which further [Greenpeace's other purposes] and support their enforcement or implementation through political or judicial processes as necessary."

The commission held that these purposes were not merely ancillary to its charitable purposes; they were independent, political, purposes. As in Canada, the jurisprudential doctrine developed in New Zealand in the 1980s was based on Bowman.

Greenpeace appealed this decision, arguing charitable status was not being considered on the correct basis. A majority of the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that "(...) 'charitable' and 'political' purposes are not mutually exclusive if the political purpose is itself charitable because of public benefit within the sense the law regards as charitable. A 'political purpose exclusion' as a matter of law is not necessary."8 In its reasons, the court emphasized that the doctrine of exclusion of political purposes was relatively recent, based on little authority, and has not been necessary or beneficial.

The court further stated that a case where the promotion of views is properly regarded as charitable in itself is possible.

"More importantly, it is difficult to see that all advocacy for legislative change should be excluded from being recognised as charitable. Promotion of law reform of the type often undertaken by law commissions which aims to keep laws fit for modern purposes may well be properly seen as charitable if undertaken by private organisations even though such reform inevitably entails promotion of legislation. Such advocacy may well constitute in itself a public good which is analogous to other good works within the sense the law considers charitable."9

Although recognizing that such a case would be unusual, the court felt a "blanket exclusion" would create rigidity in an area of the law that should be responsive to the way in which society works.

"Just as the law of charities recognised the public benefit of philanthropy in easing the burden on parishes of alleviating poverty, keeping utilities in repair, and educating the poor in post-Reformation Elizabethan England, the circumstances of the modern outsourced and perhaps contracting state may throw up new need for philanthropy which is properly to be treated as charitable."10

Relevance to the Canadian context

Although not binding in Canada, the Supreme Court of New Zealand's decision is of interest. Since the law in both Canada and New Zealand is derived from Bowman, it could be used by Canadian charities determined to be ineligible for charitable registration or facing revocation of such status.

Moreover, the New Zealand decision is in line with the Australian stance on charitable status, which also does not exclude political purposes from qualification as a "charity." In Australia, the Charities Act, 2013 (Cth) codified the common law to better define the definition of charity and expand the meaning of "charitable purpose" to better address the needs of the contemporary not-for-profit sector.11 The codified definition was expanded to include purposes advancing social or public welfare, culture, or promoting or protecting human rights, amongst others.12

Furthermore, it does not exclude political purposes broadly; rather, it specifically excludes from registration entities whose objects involve "promoting or opposing a political party or a candidate for political office."13 This appears to be in line with the Supreme Court of New Zealand's reasoning.

The Supreme Court of New Zealand has recently concluded that the political purpose exclusion is outdated, not necessary nor beneficial, as well as lacking in legal basis. If given the opportunity, perhaps Canadian courts will re-evaluate whether a political purpose can be in fact be considered charitable in Canada.

The author wishes to thank Carole Gilbert, articling student, for her help in preparing this legal update.


1. The Canadian Press, "Pen Canada hit with political-activities tax audit" (July 21, 2014), online : CBC News,;

2. Bowman and others v. Secular Society Ltd., [1917] AC 406 [Bowman].

3.[1990] 1 R.C.S. 10.

4.Canada Revenue Agency, "Political Activities," Policy Statement CPS-022 (September 2, 2003), online: CRA,

5. Ibid at s.6.2.

6. Canada Revenue Agency, "How to Draft Purposes for Charitable Registration," Guidance CG-019 (July 25, 2013), online: CRA,

7.Re Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc [2014] NZSC 105

8.Ibid at paras 113-116.

9. Ibid at para 62.

10.Ibid at 69.

11. Chris Beeny and Julian Smith, "Charities Act 2013 takes effect: meaning of "charity"
clarified" (February 28, 2014), online: Maddocks,

12. Ibid.


Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members ('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions