Canada: B.C. Supreme Court Issues Major Award For Remediation Of Contaminated Site

The B.C. Supreme Court issued a key decision in the area of contaminated sites in August, awarding $4.75 million in "reasonably incurred" remediation costs to the plaintiff, JI Properties, Inc. The award compensated JI Properties for money it spent remediating contamination on James Island, B.C. This award is the largest of its kind to date. The decision is potentially precedent-setting, contributing to the development of B.C.'s contaminated sites law in a number of areas. The decision:

  • reiterates that "polluter pays" underpins the entire Environmental Management Act contaminated sites regime, by finding the defendant polluter responsible for paying all of the plaintiff's reasonably incurred remediation costs;
  • found the limitation period for cost recovery actions under the 1996 Limitation Act is six years and does not begin until all of the costs of remediation are incurred;
  • held that comfort letters issued to landowners by the Ministry of Environment prior to the introduction of the EMA are not the same as Certificates of Compliance under the EMA and do not protect a responsible person from liability for remediation costs; and
  • applied a broad, purposive approach to evaluating the reasonableness of remediation costs, and accepts that reliance on expert consultants is a strong indicia of reasonableness.

In J.I. Properties Inc. v. PPG Architectural Coatings Canada Inc., 2014 BCSC 1619, JI Properties brought a cost recovery action to recover $5.25 million it incurred remediating contamination on James Island. JI Properties was the island's current owner, which discovered and remediated contamination on the island in 2004-2006.

The defendant was the island's historic polluter, having owned and/or operated explosives manufacturing and storage operations on James Island for at least 30 years. 

After a five-week trial, the court awarded JI Properties $4.75 million for its reasonably incurred remediation costs. Key aspects of this decision are as follows:

Polluter pays underpins regime

The court's decision is another in a series of cases in which the courts note that the "whole purpose of the EMA regime is to ensure that the person who pollutes the land pays for the cost of its restoration." In that regard, the court also held that the subsequent land-owners' motives for remediating the land are "largely irrelevant. So long as the remediation methodology and the associated costs are reasonable, the polluter can [be] held liable for those costs." In this case, the court held that JI Properties acted reasonably when it undertook the remediation necessary for it to achieve its development objectives on James Island.

The court did, however, leave open the possibility that in future cases landowners may bear some or all of the remediation costs if the remediation increases the utility or value of the property by an amount that exceeds the costs claimed for the remediation. This question remains to be resolved in a future case.

Deadline to commence a lawsuit (limitation period)

Limitation periods for cost recovery under the EMA have long been an open question. A limitation period is the time within which a party must commence a lawsuit or be barred from doing so. The court here provided considerable guidance on this issue.

First, the court held that JI Properties' claim was not time-barred because JI Properties continued to incur costs of remediation within two years of commencing its action. In the court's view, JI Properties' right to bring its cost-recovery action did not begin until after it incurred all of its claimed costs of remediation. The court based this finding on the unique nature of the statutory cause of action under the EMA and the need to interpret legislation in a way that "should advance not hobble the integrity" of the legislation's regime, which allows for recovery of remediation costs from any "responsible person" absolutely and retroactively.

Second, the court held that, in any event, the appropriate limitation period for this action, which was governed by the 1996 Limitation Act, was six years, not two. Under that Act, there had been some question whether a cost recovery claim was an action "for damages in respect of injury to person or property ... whether based on contract, tort or statutory duty," for which a two-year limitation period was prescribed, or if a cost recovery action was an action not otherwise prescribed and therefore governed by a six-year limitation period. The court found that a cost recovery action (1) is not based on contract, tort or statutory duty and (2) is not an action for damages. For those reasons, it held that cost recovery actions are governed by a six-year limitation period.

Ministry comfort letters are not akin to "certificates of compliance" under the EMA

The court also rejected the defendant's argument that it was immunized from liability because it had remediated parts of James Island before selling it in the 1980s, and had obtained a comfort letter by the Ministry of Environment that recognized this fact.

The court concluded that comfort letters were not akin to Certificates of Compliance, which are statutory instruments available to persons who remediate contaminated sites in compliance with the EMA regime. Only the latter may protect a responsible person from future liability for contamination under the EMA.

Role of environmental consultants

The court also made a number of important comments about the reliance parties may place on their environmental consultants who guide the remediation work. The court held it was "entirely reasonable" for JI Properties to rely on its "highly qualified expert consultant ... to assist with the difficult technical issues and thereafter to follow that consultant's determinations and recommendations respecting the presence and remediation of contaminants." Although the use of a consultant does not "immunize" a landowner from appropriate criticisms about the remediation methodology or cost, the "the selection and use of an appropriately qualified expert is a factor which bestows reasonableness upon the ensuing approach to remediation and the costs associated with same."

This finding is significant because this case was a lengthy trial dominated by expert testimony criticizing the remediation work conducted by SEACOR, the plaintiff's environmental expert. This decision may, in the future, discourage a defendant from attempting to "chip away" at a cost recovery claim by retaining experts to criticize every remediation step taken by a plaintiff. The decision does so by taking a broad, purposive approach to reasonableness that does not nitpick every detail of a remediation. 

Reasonable remediation costs

Lastly, the court concluded that most of JI Properties' claimed remediation expenses were "reasonable" and therefore properly part of the amount claimed in the case. The judge noted that JI Properties:

"is a sophisticated entity and had no motive for incurring costs that were not necessary nor for paying for work that was not carried out. As indicated, however, a discount to account for 'gray areas' in arithmetic and allocation is warranted to ensure fairness. A further discount is also appropriate on the same basis to reflect that the "remediation by detonation" approach, whether as a "safety measure" or otherwise, was misguided." (para. 180)

The court also noted the defendant ought to have provided a detailed forensic accounting in its attack of the remediation expenses to expose what it viewed as specific frailties in the plaintiff's claim. As a result, the court offered what it called "rough justice" in terms of a fair discount on the total amount claimed to account for some "gray areas" in the plaintiff's accounting.

Given that only the defendant, not the plaintiff, had contributed to the contamination at issue, the court found that the defendant was fully liable for the reasonable remediation costs incurred by the plaintiff.

In the result, JI Properties recovered 90 per cent of the amount it claimed, with an award of $4.75M dollars issued against the defendant. The defendant had 30 days to file an appeal of the decision.

Originally published in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions