TD Bank issued a report on September 24, 2014, providing an
economic valuation of urban forests in the greater Halifax,
Montreal and Vancouver areas, estimating that these forests contain
more than 100 million trees which carry an estimated worth of $51
billion (Halifax: $11.5B; Montreal: $4.5B; Vancouver: $35B). TD
claims that for each dollar spent on maintenance of these trees,
between $1.88 and $12.70 in benefits are realized each year,
depending on the city.
For example, the TD report claims that the largest benefit to
Montreal from its urban forest is the cover from wet
weather and the reduced strain such weather puts on
infrastructure. Trees also help to reduce the city's water
treatment bill by over 4% each year. The report also claims that
the energy savings provided by Montreal's urban forest is
enough to pay for more than 1,000 household annual energy
For Vancouver, the report states that its urban forests remove
more than 10% of the carbon monoxide released each year by major
industries in the region, and close to 90% of nitrogen dioxide
emissions. "Together with wet-weather flow benefits, the urban
forest provides over $210 million in benefits annually."
The TD report comes as a follow-up to its June 2014 publication in which TD valued
Toronto's urban forests at $7 billion, or about $700 per tree.
We previously blogged on the Toronto study, indicating that
the valuation of environmental resources has potential drawbacks,
but even TD acknowledged that its valuation efforts are only
low-ball estimates that cannot take into account aesthetic,
cultural or spiritual values.
Why is TD studying the value of urban forests? TD is frank in
the FAQs it posts on its website: in 2012, it
conducted a survey of its clients and customers, and found that
more than 90% of those surveyed indicated that environmental issues
were important and that forests were in need of protection.
Even if TD is studying these issues only to appeal to
environmentally-conscious clients and customers, the reason
doesn't seem as important as the fact that they are doing it.
And while some might find the valuation of environmental resources
as distasteful or dangerous, it is one way to get polar interest
groups in society speaking the same language, or at least sharing a
conversation. For example, conservation groups have used
computer modelling to show that B.C.'s old growth forests are worth more
standing than for logging. Talking about the value of
environmental benefits is really just the flip-side of valuing the
costs of environmental degradation; the true costs of deforestation
or dirty energy. We applaud corporations for directing resources to
environmental conservation efforts that do not directly affect
their bottom lines. It shows the true power or ability of the
marketplace to harness great resources for social good.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Ontario's Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change continues to roll out its Climate Change Action Plan with its proposed GHG guide for projects that are subject to the province's Environmental Assessment Act.
The Imperial Oil refinery pled guilty to one offence for discharging a contaminant, coker stabilizer, thermocracked gas, into the natural environment causing an adverse effect and was fined $650,000...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).