Canada: Factors Beware: Your Conduct Can Affect Your Contractual Rights Under The Factoring Agreement And Result In Liability For Damages To Your Clients

Last Updated: October 7 2014
Article by Jeffrey Alpert


Factors need to beware that their conduct can affect their contractual rights under the factoring agreement and result in liability for damages to their clients. Even though a written factoring agreement contains certain provisions for the protection of the factor, the benefit of these provisions can be lost if the factor behaves incorrectly. This is what happened in a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in the case of Grand Financial Management Inc. v. Solemio Transportation Inc. et al, 2013 ONSC 3257, which is reported in 2 Personal Property Security Act Cases (4th) 94 and in 2013 Carswell Ont 18406.

In this case, the Court was required to consider a claim by Grand Financial Management Inc. ("Grand Financial") for breach of a factoring agreement against Solemio Transportation Inc. ("Solemio") and its principal Sami Ullah (the "Guarantor"). Both Solemio and the Guarantor brought a counterclaim against Grand Financial alleging that its actions had adversely affected Solemio's business. In reaching its decision, the Court applied a legal principle known as "Promissory Estoppel" which stopped Grand Financial from denying that the factoring agreement was terminated. The Court held that a verbal representation made by Grand Financial to Solemio terminated the Factoring Agreement, even though the provisions of the Factoring Agreement required Solemio to provide 60-days written notice of termination. In response to the counterclaim by the two defendants against Grand Financial, the Court also reviewed the conduct of Grand Financial in attempting to collect the amount owing to it by Solemio. The Court found that the actions of Grand Financial constituted intentional interference with Solemio's economic relations. As a result, the Court held that Grand Financial was liable to Solemio for damages in the amount of $175,000.00.


The relevant facts were as follows:

Grand Financial offered a variety of financial services to companies in the trucking business, including the provision of cash flow to transportation companies.

Solemio was a transport company that entered into a factoring agreement (the "Factoring Agreement") with Grand Financial on July 10, 2007.

Paragraph 12.1 of the Factoring Agreement provided that the agreement shall continue indefinitely until terminated by a 60-day written notice by either party.

Paragraph 12.2 provided that, notwithstanding termination of the Agreement, Solemio shall continue to be liable to Grand Financial for the full and prompt payment of accounts purchased by Grand Financial which are then outstanding and unpaid.

The Factoring Agreement further provided that Grand Financial shall continue to have a security interest in the collateral of Solemio, including any security interests granted under any security document, until all such indebtedness of Solemio to Grand Financial was paid in full.

The Guarantor signed a personal guarantee in favour of Grand Financial in support of the Factoring Agreement.

Arnold Bros. Transport Ltd. ("Arnold Bros.") was one of Solemio's major clients.

On July 10, 2007, Grand Financial sent to Arnold Bros. a direction (the "Direction") signed by Solemio directing that, effective immediately, all of the accounts payable to Solemio shall be paid directly to Grand Financial.

The Direction was acknowledged by the logistics manager of Arnold Bros. on July 18, 2007.

According to the evidence of Solemio, it used a "quick pay" system with its customers (including Arnold Bros.) prior to entering into the Factoring Agreement with Grand Financial. Under this system, Solemio granted a discount of 2.5% to its customers if the customers paid Solemio right away.

Prior to entering into the Factoring Agreement, Solemio told Grand Financial that it was using a "quick pay" system from Arnold Bros. According to Solemio, the chief financial officer ("CFO") of Grand Financial told Solemio that if Solemio did not like the Factoring Agreement, it could go back to its old system of dealing directly with Arnold Bros.

In the first couple of weeks after signing the Factoring Agreement, Solemio sent its invoices to Grand Financial for processing. Solemio then compared the cost of using Grand Financial to the discount charged under the "quick pay" system with Arnold Bros., and concluded that the Factoring Agreement with Grand Financial was the more expensive alternative.

During a phone call at the end of July or beginning of August 2007, the Guarantor told the CFO of Grand Financial that Solemio was losing money by using Grand Financial. He also told the CFO that Solemio wanted to end the Factoring Agreement and that Solemio would not send any more invoices to Grand Financial. According to the Guarantor, the CFO of Grand Financial confirmed that the Factoring Agreement was terminated.

Solemio subsequently called the logistics manager at Arnold Bros. and told her that Solemio had terminated its Factoring Agreement with Grand Financial and would go back to the "quick pay" system. The logistics manager of Arnold Bros. told Solemio that she needed to verify this with Grand Financial, so she initiated a three-way phone conversation among Solemio, Grand Financial, and Arnold Bros. The Court found that during this telephone call, the CFO of Grand Financial agreed that Arnold Bros. could go back to paying Solemio directly and that payment would not be required to be made to Grand Financial.

The logistics manager of Arnold Bros. acknowledged that she did not confirm the above conversation in writing and that she never received a written release authorizing Arnold Bros. to make the payments directly to Solemio.

Shortly after their first three-way call, there was another conference call involving the Guarantor, the CFO of Grand Financial, and the logistics manager of Arnold Bros. Arnold Bros. was arranging for payment of both the invoices that had been rendered pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, as well as invoices submitted directly by Solemio to Arnold Bros. under the "quick pay" system. During this call, it was agreed that Arnold Bros. could make its cheques payable jointly to Solemio and Grand Financial, who would then sort out their respective entitlements. As a result, Arnold Bros. sent out two cheques for $90,970.00 and $66,111.25 payable jointly to Solemio and Grand Financial near the end of August 2007. Following the issue of the above cheques, Arnold Bros. proceeded to pay Solemio only under its "quick pay" system.

In December 2007, the logistics manager of Arnold Bros. received a telephone call from the CFO of Grand Financial, whom she described as being very angry. The CFO told her that someone was going to pay the money he was owed by Solemio and that he didn't care who. He also threatened to go after the customers of Arnold Bros.

In January 2008, there was a follow up telephone call from the CFO of Grand Financial to the logistics manager of Arnold Bros. The CFO indicated that Grand Financial was going to go after Arnold Bros. for the money that Grand Financial was owed by Solemio. After this matter was referred to the vice-president of Arnold Bros., Arnold Bros. made a decision not to use Solemio's services any further, because Arnold Bros. did not want to put their customers in jeopardy. As a result, Arnold Bros. gave a direction that Solemio trucks were to be stopped where they were located and made arrangements to pick up the loads from the Solemio trucks.

The Guarantor testified that in early January 2008, the CFO of Grand Financial called him and threatened to shut down Solemio. There was also evidence from the Guarantor of threats or intimidation in other telephone calls.

By January 10, 2008, Grand Financial proceeded to enforce its security against Solemio pursuant to the provisions of the Factoring Agreement. Grand Financial delivered copies of its security documentation to Arnold Bros. and to Solemio's banker, the Royal Bank of Canada ("RBC"). Grand Financial claimed entitlement to the funds owing by Arnold Bros. to Solemio and to the funds held by RBC in Solemio's bank account. RBC delivered approximately $35,000.00 held in the account to Grand Financial.

Solemio subsequently ceased its business operations.

Grand Financial brought an action against Solemio claiming the sum of $219,250.00 for breach of the Factoring Agreement and against the Guarantor for the same amount pursuant to his personal guarantee.

Solemio counterclaimed against Grand Financial for damages alleging that the actions of Grand Financial constituted intentional interference with Solemio's economic relations that adversely affected Solemio's business.


There were a number of issues that were raised, in the case, but the ones most relevant to factors are the following:

Does the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel preclude Grand Financial from relying on the strict terms of the Factoring Agreement and the personal guarantee executed by the Guarantor?

If the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel applies, did Grand Financial have the right to use the security provisions under the Factoring Agreement following its termination?

Have Solemio and the Guarantor established a claim against Grand Financial for intentional interference with economic relations?

If Solemio has established a claim for intentional interference with economic relations, what is the proper assessment of its damages?


Issue #1 – The Doctrine Of Promissory Estoppel

The doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is a legal principle that enables a defendant to defend a claim by a plaintiff. The defendant must establish that the plaintiff has, by its words or conduct, made a promissory assurance which was intended to affect the legal relationship between the parties and intended to be acted on by the defendant. In addition, the defendant must establish that, in reliance on the plaintiff's representation or conduct, the defendant acted on it or in some way changed its position.

In this case, Grand Financial tried to argue that Solemio was bound by Section 12.1 of the Factoring Agreement which provided that the Factoring Agreement would continue indefinitely until terminated by a 60-day written notice by either party. The evidence was clear that written notice was not provided by Solemio. However, in the Court's view, the requirements for Promissory Estoppel had been established on the evidence. It was clear that there was an existing legal relationship between Solemio and Grand Financial at the time of the telephone call that took place at the end of July or beginning of August, 2007. Based on the evidence, the Court concluded that the Factoring Agreement was terminated during the above call. The Court found that there was a clear promise or representation made by the CFO of Grand Financial to Solemio that the Factoring Agreement would be treated as terminated. Solemio and the Guarantor relied upon it and they acted on this statement to their detriment. In particular, Solemio subsequently proceeded to deal directly with Arnold Bros. with respect to their invoices, and it was this action, at least in part, which led to Grand Financial taking subsequent default proceedings against Solemio.

Based on the above analysis, the Court applied the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel, which stopped Grand Financial from denying that the Factoring Agreement was terminated approximately two weeks after its execution. It was logical and reasonable to infer that Grand Financial would not rely on the other documents that were executed in connection with the Factoring Agreement, including the personal guarantee. It therefore followed that the termination of the Factoring Agreement also terminated the Guarantor's obligations under his personal guarantee.

Issue #2 – Use Of Security Provisions Under The Factoring Agreement Following Its Termination

Based on the evidence, the Court found that the debts owing to Grand Financial at the time that the Factoring Agreement was terminated were satisfied in full by the two cheques for $90,970.00 and $66,111.25 issued by Arnold Bros. Upon payment of the above amounts, Solemio had no further obligations to Grand Financial pursuant to the Factoring Agreement which, in turn, meant that Grand Financial lost the right to use the security provisions under the Factoring Agreement.

Issue #3 - Claim For Intentional Interference With Economic Relations

The three essential elements of a claim for intentional interference with economic relations are:

  • the defendant intended to injure the plaintiff's economic interests;
  • the interference was by illegal or unlawful means; and
  • the plaintiff suffered economic loss or harm as a result.

In this case, the Court found that Solemio had established a valid claim against Grand Financial for intentional interference with economic relations. Based on the evidence given by the logistics manager of Arnold Bros., the Court concluded that the CFO of Grand Financial was willing to take any steps within his power, whether lawful or unlawful, to get the money that he thought was owing by Solemio. The CFO of Grand Financial was well aware of the intended and natural consequences which he knew would flow from his deliberate actions in executing on the security pursuant to the Factoring Agreement, which he knew was terminated. By purporting to execute on this security, the actions of Grand Financial were directed at third parties (including Arnold Bros. and RBC) which then became the vehicle for which harm was caused to Solemio. Solemio was left in a situation where funds in its bank account were unlawfully seized without the authority of any Court action or judgment. The CFO of Grand Financial had acted unlawfully by demanding that Arnold Bros. pay Grand Financial the amounts owing to Solemio and by threatening to pursue the customers of Arnold Bros. These unlawful acts caused Arnold Bros. to terminate its business relationship with Solemio. Solemio suffered economic loss as a result of the actions of Grand Financial in wrongfully seizing the sum of $35,000.00 from Solemio's bank account and in destroying a significant business relationship of Solemio with Arnold Bros.

Issue #4 - Damages For Intentional Interference With Economic Relations

The Court noted that Solemio had presented virtually no evidence with respect to its claim for damages relating to the intentional interference with its economic relations. Even though Solemio had failed to provide evidence relating to its damages, it was still the duty of the Court to do its best, based on the evidence before it, to quantify the appropriate compensation owed to Solemio. Taking all the circumstances into account, the Court concluded that a reasonable assessment of the damages at large would be the sum of $175,000.00, and that Solemio was entitled to judgment against Grand Financial for the above amount.


The decision in this case serves as a warning to all factors that they should insist upon strict compliance with the terms of their factoring agreements. Instead of relying upon telephone conversations with Solemio and Arnold Bros., Grand Financial should have sent an e-mail, or fax, or letter to the other parties immediately following the above conversations confirming what the parties had discussed. If Grand Financial never intended to accept the termination by Solemio over the telephone, it should have confirmed in writing that the provisions of the Factoring Agreement continued to apply, including paragraph 12.1 providing for 60-day written notice of termination by Solemio. There should have been similar written confirmation regarding the position of Grand Financial that Arnold Bros. should continue to make payment directly to Grand Financial for the amounts owing to Solemio until such time as Arnold Bros. received a release in writing from Grand Financial.

The above recommendations apply to all provisions of the factoring agreement, not only the termination and payment provisions. For example, if there is a discussion between the factor and its client regarding any of the provisions of the factoring agreement such as an event of default or a breach of a covenant, then the factor should take care to ensure that the positions of the parties are confirmed in writing. If a factor is willing to waive a certain event of default or breach, then the factor should make it clear in writing that such waiver only applies to the specific default or breach and does not apply to any subsequent default or breach. The factor needs to make sure that its conduct or verbal representations do not provide its client with the opportunity to resist a claim by the factor under the factoring agreement based upon the defence of Promissory Estoppel.

Factors must also beware of a possible claim for damages by their clients for intentional interference with their clients' economic relations. If the behaviour of the factor in attempting to assert its claim against its client goes far beyond what is commercially reasonably and legally permissible, then a Court may find the factor to be liable to its client for damages as a result of intentional interference with economic relations. The decision of the Court in this case is a warning to factors that their words and actions can have detrimental consequences, including the loss of the factor's contractual rights and liability of the factor to its clients for damages.

Originally published by IFA Factoring Update and News, July 2014.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeffrey Alpert
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.