Canada: Recent Developments in Class Proceedings: the (Un)Enforceability of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

Last Updated: August 31 2005

Article by David Neave & Jennifer Spencer, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP


In response to the proliferation of consumer class actions, many companies in the service industry incorporate mandatory arbitration clauses into consumer contracts so to preclude any court action, including class proceedings. However, a trend appears to be emerging in the law which favours class proceedings over arbitration. Recent authority from the British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed a class proceedings certification hearing to proceed in the face of a mandatory arbitration clause, noting that an application to stay proceedings in favour of arbitration was premature until there is a finding that a class proceeding was not the preferable procedure. Further, pending legislation in Ontario renders "inoperative" and unenforceable a mandatory arbitration clause in a consumer contract-which itself is not unconscionable or otherwise void-simply by a consumer commencing a proposed class action with respect to any dispute arising under the contract.

The British Columbia and Ontario approaches run counter to American jurisprudence which supports the enforcement of mandatory arbitration provisions in consumer agreements notwithstanding that they may effectively bar determination by way of class action or class arbitration. With consumer contracts on both sides of the border increasingly including mandatory arbitration clauses, this divergence in the jurisprudence is somewhat troubling, particularly for clients whose business straddles multiple jurisdictions

Mandatory Arbitration vs. class proceedings: the Trend

Ontario: Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and Unconscionability

In Ontario, the courts considered the enforceability of mandatory arbitration clauses in the context of proposed class proceedings in the two cases: Huras v. Primerica Financial Services Inc. and in Kanitz v. Rogers Cable Inc.

In Huras, the issue of whether an arbitration clause in a standard form employment contract was unconscionable and ought to give way in favour of a proposed class proceeding was considered. Mr. Justice Cumming held that the temporal operation of the arbitration clause did not extend to the relationship between the parties during the pre-employment training period. As a result, the defendant employer was not entitled to a stay of the proposed class proceeding in accordance with the Ontario Arbitration Act.

In Kanitz, a proposed class action advanced in response to service disruptions with Rogers Cable Inc. high-speed internet service, the Court concluded that the mandatory arbitration clause was not invalid under the Ontario Arbitration Act, and the Court stayed the action under s.7(1) of the Ontario Arbitration Act. The Court held that the arbitration clause was not void for unconscionability on the basis it was not "sufficiently divergent from community standards of commercial morality." Further, the Court observed that class proceeding legislation confers procedural and not substantive rights. The parties still have recourse to a dispute resolution mechanism albeit in the form (and forum) set out in their contractual relationship. Further, the contract provisions for dispute resolution may allow the consolidation of like disputes into a class arbitration.

In 2002, the Ontario Legislature enacted certain amendments to the Consumer Protection Act which, if proclaimed, will favour class proceedings over arbitration and will render the Kanitz decision of no precedential value in Ontario. The amendments authorize a consumer to commence a class proceeding arising out of a consumer transaction notwithstanding a term in an agreement precluding such proceedings.

The American Experience

In the recent (June 2003) U.S. Supreme Court decision in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle, the Court confirmed its strong support for enforceability of arbitration clauses. In this case, at issue were the mandatory arbitration agreements that two groups of plaintiffs executed with respect to certain home loans with Green Tree Financial Corp. The arbitration clause was silent with respect to whether the dispute could be resolved by class arbitration. Both groups of plaintiffs sought class certification; Green Tree Financial sought an order to stay court proceedings and compel arbitration instead. In both cases, the South Carolina Court certified a class and sent both disputes to arbitration. Multi-million dollar awards were rendered.

Significantly, the U.S. Supreme Court did not comment upon the enforceability of no-class action arbitration provisions in the consumer context per se. Rather, the majority of the Court held that the question of whether an arbitration clause (which is silent with respect to class arbitration) is operative in the face of class claims is a question of contract interpretation and arbitration procedure. It is a matter, the majority determined, for the arbitrator to determine.

British Columbia: Arbitration Clauses may be "Inoperative" in the face of Class Proceedings

In British Columbia, the enforcement of a mandatory arbitration clause in a class proceeding was recently considered by the Court of Appeal in MacKinnon v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres (Kelowna) Ltd.

The MacKinnon case places in sharp relief the operational conflict between the Commercial Arbitration Act and the Class Proceedings Act in British Columbia. On the one hand, the Commercial Arbitration Act requires the Court, on application by a party to an arbitration agreement, to stay related legal proceedings unless the Court determines that the arbitration agreement is "void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed." In contrast, the Class Proceedings Act requires the Court to certify a proceeding as a class proceeding where the requirements for certification are met.

In the MacKinnon case, the plaintiff seeks to certify, on behalf of British Columbia residents, a class proceeding against 28 corporate defendants each of which the plaintiff asserts was engaged in the pay day loans business. The statement of claim asserts that the defendants unlawfully breached the usury (criminal interest rate) provisions in the Criminal Code, that each of the defendants was unjustly enriched, and that the making of such loans constitutes an "unconscionable practice" under the BC Trade Practices Act.

At the commencement of the MacKinnon action certain defendants who had mandatory arbitration clauses in their respective loan contracts brought an application for a stay of proceedings under the BC Commercial Arbitration Act. The Chambers Judge Brown J. dismissed the defendants’ stay applications concluding "in the face of a class proceeding, the arbitration agreement is inoperative."

At the subsequent appeal, Madam Justice Levine (writing for a panel of five) was in "general agreement" with the reasoning of the Court below. Her Ladyship concluded, however, that any order to stay the proceedings was premature: it is only after the Court determines whether a class proceeding will be certified that the arbitration clause becomes inoperative.

Following the analysis in MacKinnon, it is only when the Court has completed its analysis of the certification application and determines it must certify the proceedings as a class proceeding that the Court can conclude the arbitration clause is inoperative. Accordingly, the applications for a stay and for certification of the class proceedings are interdependent and must be considered at the same time. In this way, the MacKinnon decision contrasts with those in both Ontario decisions-Huras and Kanitz.

The holding in MacKinnon is significant in a number of respects. The decision may be applicable to a broad range of consumer and commercial agreements that contain mandatory arbitration agreements. Further, while the BC arbitration legislation contemplates a stay of legal proceedings unless the arbitration agreement is void, inoperative or incapable of being performed, the Court appears to prioritize a statutory procedural preference couched in public policy considerations over substantive contractual analysis.

Implicit in the MacKinnon and Huras cases is the view from the Bench that arbitration cannot be used to efficiently and cost-effectively resolve consumer disputes. However, arbitration is widely regarded to offer a number of advantages to litigation, including both time and costs savings. Further, provincial arbitration acts provide arbitrators with substantial authority for the efficient and effective resolution of disputes. Arbitrators also have the discretion to award a successful party its actual costs for legal fees and disbursements, including expert fees, thereby providing full indemnity for a meritorious claim. As Mr. Justice Nordheimer held in Kanitz, there is an advantage to the plaintiff bringing a meritorious claim in arbitration proceedings and there is no reason—despite the Court’s concern in MacKinnon and other cases-to shield consumers from cost consequences if it is found they have advanced unmeritorious claims. Further, the economies of scale that result from consolidating claims may well be available in arbitration.


It is troubling that a trend appears to be developing in Canada which sees otherwise valid contract terms setting out alternative dispute resolution methods set aside for policy reasons favouring class proceedings. The result is not a development which favours a just, inexpensive, and speedy resolution to consumer disputes, particularly disputes that typically involve modest sums of money. A consequence of this trend may very well see British Columbia as the forum of choice for plaintiffs who seek both the sword of class proceedings and a shield of the no costs recovery rule under BC Class Proceedings Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions