Canada: Key Issues in Canadian Employment Law

Last Updated: September 21 2005
Article by Malcolm MacKillop and Christina Hall

Originally published in July 2005

American businesses continue to expand north of the border, with the result that many American companies now have employees working in Canada. While the strong political, economic and cultural ties that bind Canada and the United States permit American companies to draw on their domestic business strategy when operating in Canada, the same cannot necessarily be said about American legal strategy. This is particularly true in the area of employment law. Many American companies are surprised to learn of the statutory and common law protections that are afforded to employees under the Canadian legal system.

This article serves to summarize two important cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada in recent years that have dramatically affected Canadian employment law. These decisions will be of interest to American companies operating in Canada as they continue to manage their employment relationships north of the border.

Employee Misconduct

It has been well established in Canadian law that an employer is entitled to summarily dismiss an employee if the employer has just cause to do so. Traditionally, a single incident of serious misconduct was often sufficient to justify terminating an employee without cause. However, over the last two decades courts have moved away from this principle and have sought an approach that recognizes and corrects the power balance that exists between employers and their employees. The 2001 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in McKinley v. BC Tel 1 represents one of the most recent, and perhaps the most dramatic, manifestations of this policy.

In this case, Martin McKinley had taken a leave of absence from work due to heart problems after 16 years of service. He expressed an interest in returning to a less stressful position, but BC Tel never offered him alternative employment. Instead, BC Tel eventually terminated him and Mr. McKinley sued for wrongful dismissal. Initially, BC Tel resisted Mr. McKinley's claim by saying that it had offered him a reasonable compensation package and that it had used its best efforts to locate an alternative position for him. However, once the trial began, BC Tel discovered a letter from Mr. McKinley’s physician, which stated that he could have returned to his former position at BC Tel if he had taken a certain medication. BC Tel then took the position that Mr. McKinley had lied about his medical condition and the treatments available for it. It alleged that this dishonesty was sufficient for just cause for termination. Mr. McKinley denied the allegations of dishonesty. Thus, the issue before the Supreme Court of Canada was whether the alleged dishonesty was of a degree that undermined the employment relationship.

The Supreme Court of Canada reviewed two historic lines of cases in Canada: one which held that the circumstances of dishonesty must be considered in order to determine whether cause existed, and another which seemed to indicate that any degree of dishonesty constituted cause for dismissal. Ultimately, the court found the first line of cases to be more persuasive. It concluded that the proper approach was to recognize that only some forms of dishonesty would justify dismissal without notice. It held that the specific form of dishonesty had to be considered in each case: "specifically, the test is whether the employee’s dishonesty gave rise to a breakdown in the employment relationship"2. This has since been referred to in Canada as the ‘contextual approach’.

The contextual approach involves a two-step process. The first step is a determination of whether the evidence establishes the employee’s dishonest conduct on a balance of probabilities. If so, the second step is a determination of whether the nature and degree of the dishonesty warrants summary dismissal. This second step involves evaluating the surrounding circumstances of the misconduct, its level of seriousness, and the extent to which it detrimentally affected the employment relationship.

The impact of McKinley on wrongful dismissal jurisprudence in Canada cannot be underestimated. Not only has it changed the way that courts deal with employees accused of dishonesty, the contextual approach it created has now been applied to virtually all other forms of employee misconduct; including insolence, insubordination, poor performance and even sexual harassment.

Bad Faith Dismissal

There is no actionable tort for bad faith dismissal in Canada. However, in the 1997 case of Wallace v. United Grain Growers Limited, 3the Supreme Court of Canada recognized a remedy for employees who were dismissed in bad faith by introducing a new doctrine - that of the ‘bad faith discharge’.

In this case, Jack Wallace left a secure job of 25 years with one of United Grain Grower’s ("UGG") competitors, based on assurances by UGG that he would work with the company until his retirement, as long as he performed as expected. Mr. Wallace did indeed perform well, and he was consistently the top salesperson at UGG. However, 14 years later, when Mr. Wallace was in his late 50s, he was summarily discharged by UGG without explanation. When Mr. Wallace retained counsel, UGG alleged that it had cause to terminate him and it maintained that allegation until the eve of trial. This allegation made it very difficult for Mr. Wallace to secure alternate employment. He declared bankruptcy and suffered from depression.

The Supreme Court of Canada ultimately held that employers ought to be held to an obligation of good faith and fair dealing in the manner of dismissal so as not to exacerbate the negative effects of termination. On behalf of the majority of the court, Justice Iacobucci stated that:

The obligation of good faith and fair dealing is incapable of precise definition. However, at a minimum, I believe that in the course of dismissal, employers ought to be candid, reasonable, honest and forthright with their employees and should refrain from engaging in conduct that is unfair or is in bad faith by being, for example, untruthful, misleading or unduly insensitive.4

The court went on to state that an employer who engaged in bad faith conduct or unfair dealing in the course of terminating an employee would be subject to an increased notice period. However, the court did not set any specific parameters on such an increased notice period. Rather, it commented that it would be for the trial judge to examine in each case, the nature of the bad faith conduct and its impact in the individual circumstances. In the case of Mr. Wallace, the Supreme Court of Canada restored the trial judge's initial decision and awarded 24 months’ notice to Mr. Wallace.

Since the Wallace case, these increased notice awards have become known as ‘Wallace damages'. Courts have subsequently elaborated upon the context of the obligation of good faith and applied it to various types of employer behaviour. For example, courts have considered how this obligation relates to an employer's actions during a termination interview, when drafting a termination letter, and when structuring a settlement offer. Examples of conduct that has attracted Wallace damages includes: conveying notice of termination in a fashion designed to humiliate or punish the employee, dismissing a disabled employee without attempting to accommodate his or her disability, refusing to provide information or documentation necessary for the employee to apply for employment insurance benefits, and lying to the employee about the reasons for dismissal and/or deliberately sullying his or her reputation in the business community.

Another important aspect of Wallace damages is that courts have suggested there is no obligation to mitigate these damages - unlike damages arising from an employer's failure to provide an employee with reasonable notice. As a result, most plaintiff's counsel seek Wallace damages in every case.

As the law in this area continues to evolve, some trial judges have demonstrated their willingness to place more emphasis on the obligation of fair dealing than previously. However, for the most part, Wallace damages have not been awarded in the absence of bad faith or malice on the part of the employer.


1. [2001] 2 S.C.R. 161, (2001) 200 D.L.R. (4th) 385.

2. Ibid., at para. 48.

3. [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701, (1997) 152 D.L.R. (4th) 1.

4. Ibid., at para. 98

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.