Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Limits Ability To Appeal Arbitral Interpretations Of A Contract

Last Updated: August 13 2014
Article by Marco P. Falco

The Supreme Court of Canada has limited the ability of commercial parties to appeal an arbitrator's award, particularly with respect to the arbitrator's interpretation of a commercial contract. The decision arguably also has implications for appealing a judicial interpretation of a commercial contract.

In Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, per Rothstein J., at issue was the obligation of Creston Moly Corporation ("Creston") to pay a finder's fee to Sattva Capital Corporation ("Sattva") as a result of Sattva introducing Creston to the opportunity to acquire a mining project in Mexico. The parties agreed that under their finder's fee agreement (the "Agreement"), Sattva was entitled to a finder's fee of US $1.5 million and was entitled to be paid this fee in shares of Creston. The parties disagreed on which date should be used to price the Creston shares and therefore the number of shares to which Sattva was entitled.

As a result of the dispute, the parties entered into a commercial arbitration under the British Columbia Arbitration Act. The arbitrator found in favour of Sattva, based on his interpretation of the Agreement. Creston sought leave to appeal the decision of the arbitrator to the British Columbia Supreme Court. Following multiple leave applications and appeals, the British Columbia Court of Appeal ultimately found in favour of Creston. Sattva appealed both the decision by the Court of Appeal granting leave to appeal and the Court of Appeal's decision on the merits of the appeal.

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Court of Appeal erred in granting leave to appeal. In any event, on the merits, the Supreme Court held that the arbitrator's decision was reasonable.

Among the many issues before the Supreme Court of Canada were: whether leave ought to have been granted to appeal the arbitrator's award under the BC Arbitration Act; what was the appropriate standard of appellate review to be applied to commercial arbitration decisions; and whether the arbitrator reasonably construed the Agreement as a whole.

Justice Rothstein of the Supreme Court held as follows:

1. The arbitrator's interpretation of the contract was not a "question of law"

In order for leave to be granted from a commercial arbitral award, a threshold requirement must be met: leave must be sought on a question of law. The Court held that in this case, the arbitrator's contractual interpretation was not a question of law and did not satisfy this test. In particular, in contractual interpretation, the goal of the exercise is to ascertain the objective intent of the parties; the Court held that this was a fact-specific goal, through the application of legal principles of interpretation. Accordingly, contractual interpretation involves issues of mixed fact and law as it is an exercise in which the principles of contract interpretation are applied to the words of the written contract, considered in light of the factual matrix.

The Court held that the circumstances in which a question of law can be extricated from the interpretation process "are rare". Legal errors made in the course of contractual interpretation include the application of an incorrect principle, the failure to consider a required element of a legal test, or the failure to consider a relevant factor. They may also include the requirements for the formation of the contract, the capacity of the parties, and the requirement that certain contracts be evidenced in writing. In the absence of a legal error of the type just identified, no appeal lies from an arbitrator's interpretation of a contract.

2. Courts should defer to an arbitrator's award on a standard of reasonableness

Once a question of law has been identified, the Court must be satisfied on a leave to appeal application that the determination of that point of law on appeal "may prevent a miscarriage of justice". In order to rise to the level of a miscarriage of justice, the legal error must pertain to a material issue in the dispute which, if decided differently, would affect the result of the case. A determination of a point of law may prevent a miscarriage of justice only where the appeal has some possibility of succeeding. The appropriate threshold for assessing the legal question is whether it has "arguable merit".

Assessing whether the issue raised by an application for leave to appeal has arguable merit must be done in light of the standard of review on which the merits of the appeal will be judged. The Court held that the standards of review established by the Supreme Court in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, are not entirely applicable to appeals from arbitral awards.

The Court held that reasonableness will "almost always" apply to commercial arbitration, except in "rare circumstances" where the question is one that would attract a correctness standard of review, such as a constitutional question or a question of law of central importance to the legal system as a whole and outside the adjudicator's expertise. In this case, the Court held that even if the British Columbia Court of Appeal properly identified a question of law, leave to appeal should have been denied. The requirement that there be arguable merit that the arbitrator's decision was unreasonable was not met and the miscarriage of justice threshold was not satisfied.

Moreover, when the Court actually assessed the merits of the appeal, it held that in determining that Sattva was entitled to be paid a finder's fee in shares priced at $0.15 per share, the arbitrator reasonably construed the Agreement as a whole.

3. Courts still have residual discretion to deny leave to appeal

The Court also has a residual discretion to deny leave to appeal the arbitrator's decision, even where the requirements for leave have been met under the Arbitration Act. A non-exhaustive list of discretionary factors to be considered in a leave application include the conduct of the parties, the existence of alternative remedies, undue delay, and the urgent need for a final answer.

4. The appellate Court is not bound by the analysis of the leave Court

Finally, the Supreme Court held that if leave to appeal is granted, the appellate Court is not in any way bound by the assessment of the merits of the appeal initially made by the judge hearing the leave application. A court considering the leave application is not adjudicating the merits of the case. Accordingly, in this case, the BC Court of Appeal erred in treating the leave court's reasons on the merits as binding.

Sattva has important implications for the future of appeals from arbitral awards and for appeals of the interpretations of contracts generally. In short, it will only be in rare circumstances now that a Court will not defer to a commercial arbitrator's interpretation of a contract. Leave to appeal the arbitrator's decision to a Canadian Court has become more difficult to obtain and an element of finality has now been enshrined in commercial arbitration.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Marco P. Falco
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions