Canada: Survival Clauses And Limitations Law In Delaware And Ontario: A Quick Comparison

Recent decisions in the courts of Delaware and Ontario add to our understanding of how limitations statutes can affect survival clauses in those jurisdictions.

In the past few years, two Delaware Court of Chancery decisions – GRT, Inc. v. Marathon GTF Technology, Ltd. and ENI Holdings, LLC v. KBR Group Holdings, LLC1 – have focused on the enforceability of so-called "survival clauses" in commercial agreements. Survival clauses are typically created in response to statutes of limitations, which require that claims for breach of representations and warranties in (for example) an agreement for the purchase and sale of a business must be pursued within a specific time-frame. Parties to commercial contracts of this type often try to contract out of the statutory limitation by drafting clauses that stipulate that the representations and warranties (or some subset of them) "survive" for either a shorter or longer period of time.2

The court in ENI Holdings confirmed that such survival periods can be valid where they shorten the statutorily mandated 3-year limitation period that applies in Delaware. But what if a survival clause purports to extend Delaware's limitation period? While both ENI Holdings and GRT dealt with abbreviated limitations, the court in the latter case clearly stated, albeit in dicta, that "a survival clause that states generally that the representations and warranties will survive closing, or one that provides that the representations and warranties will survive indefinitely, is treated as if it expressly provided that the representations and warranties would survive for the applicable statute of limitations."3

This does not mean that representations and warranties can never be enforceable beyond Delaware's 3-year limitation period. U.S. counsel and commentators generally suggest a range of options, from using a "specialty contract"(i.e. a contract under seal which, under Delaware law, is subject to the 20-year common law limitation period) to amending the choice of law provision and selecting a jurisdiction with a longer statute of limitations period for breach of contract claims (New York, for example, has a 6-year limitation period which cannot be extended by contract, while California has a 4-year limitation period that can be extended or waived by contract). Each alternative will have its pluses and minuses, depending on the individual interests of the parties involved and on the circumstances of the transaction.

Comparison with Ontario

In Ontario, the legal framework is closer to that of California than Delaware. Following amendments to the Limitations Act, 2002 that came into force in 2006, parties to "business agreements" can include survival provisions which shorten, extend, suspend or entirely exclude a statutory limitation period. This includes the 2-year basic limitation period (which begins to run on the day the claim is discovered) as well as the 15-year ultimate limitation period (which commences on the day an act or omission takes place, irrespective of discovery).

Ontario courts have recently issued several rulings relating to survival clauses. The Superior Court's 2012 decision in Bell Canada v. Plan Group Inc. took what might be described as a hardline approach. The judge in that case held that a survival clause could override a statutory limitation only where the intention of the parties to do so was evidenced by "clear and express language" including an explicit reference to the limitations statute whose limitation the parties wished to avoid as well as clear and explicit language expressing that intention.4 However, the Ontario Court of Appeal, in its 2013 decision in Boyce v. The Co-Operators General Insurance Co., overturned a Superior Court ruling that had purported to apply Bell Canada. In so doing, the Court of Appeal rejected the Bell Canada analysis5 and suggested a more lenient standard, i.e. that the agreement (i) describe a limitation period in "clear language",6 (ii) set out the scope of that limitation and (iii) make clear that it applies irrespective of other limitation periods. Under this doctrine, there appears to be no general requirement to identify the statutory limitations that the survival clause is intended to avoid.7 It is interesting to compare this to ENI Holdings, in which the Delaware court held that a survival clause need not be "particularly 'clear or explicit'" with respect to its intention to shorten the standard limitation period because survival clauses are understood by "convention" to have precisely that purpose.8

Prior to the Limitations Act, 2002 (which, despite its name, took effect only in 2004), Ontario's statutory limitations regime functioned much in the same way as Delaware's does now. There was a six-year limitation period and a separate 20-year limitation period for "specialty debts" (debts due or acknowledged to be due on account of an instrument under seal) which provided commercial parties the flexibility to get around the statutory constraint. This separate "specialty debts" limitation period became obsolete, however, with the 2004 amendments, and as a result it was abolished. The commercial rationale for using sealed instruments in Ontario is now limited to avoiding the need for consideration and invoking the "sealed contract rule" (which states that where an agent signs a contract for an undisclosed principal, the undisclosed principal is shielded from, and the agent has, liability).

Other Canadian jurisdictions

It should be noted that the analysis of Canadian law in this post applies to Ontario only and that limitations law varies among Canada's other jurisdictions in much the same way that it does among the various American jurisdictions. In Alberta, for example, the situation is the reverse of Delaware's: commercial parties are allowed to extend, but not to shorten, that province's two-year statutory limitation period.[9] Other provinces' limitations statutes take a range of approaches, including remaining silent on the issue, as is the case with the British Columbia and Nova Scotia statutes. Under article 2884 of the Civil Code of Quebec (CCQ), "No prescriptive period other than that provided by law may be agreed upon." While parties cannot therefore provide for a limitation ("prescriptive") period that is longer or shorter than that provided for in the CCQ, it may be possible to achieve what is effectively a similar result by creating rights and remedies that have effect only in the event that certain future conditions are fulfilled (or not fulfilled), rather than attempting to enforce existing representations and warranties beyond the period permitted under the CCQ.


1. GRT, Inc. v. Marathon GTF Tech., Ltd., C.A. No. 5571-CS, 5, n. 7 (Del. Ch. 2011) and ENI Holdings LLC v. KBR Group Holdings, LLC, C.A. No. 8075-VCG (Del. Ch. 2013). Statements in this post that relate to the law of Delaware and other U.S. jurisdictions are not intended to imply that the authors are qualified to practice law in any non-Canadian jurisdiction.

2. Note, however, that U.S. state courts vary in their willingness to interpret survival clauses as affecting or establishing limitation periods, particularly where clear and express language to this effect is absent from the parties' agreement. The courts of Delaware have generally taken the view that establishing a survival period will typically establish a corresponding limitation period. See, for example, GRT, Inc., supra.

3. GRT, Inc., supra, at 37 per Chancellor Strine (as he then was).

4. Bell Canada v. Plan Group Inc. 2012 ONSC 42, paras. 40-41.

5. Boyce v. The Co-Operators General Insurance Co., 2013 ONCA 298, para. 17.

6. See Kassburg v. Sun Life Ass'ce Co. of Canada, 2014 ONSC 1523, a case concerning a group insurance policy. In the court's view, the policy qualified as a business contract but was ambiguous in attempting to set a time limit on the insured's right to claim under the policy. The Superior Court held that the requirement (i) in Boyce (see above) had not been met and that the Limitations Act, 2002 therefore governed the contract. (para. 30)

7. Boyce, supra, para. 20.

8. ENI Holdings, supra, at 18. The Court appears to have been paraphrasing a passage in GRT, Inc., supra, at 25.

9. Limitations Act (Alberta), s. 7.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions