Canada: Headhunter Discriminates In Hiring; Employer Found Liable


Reiss v. CCH Canadian Limited, 2013 HRTO 764 is the latest case out of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal dealing with age discrimination in hiring.  Reiss is important in general because the tribunal found an employer liable for the discriminatory acts of an outside human resources consultant retained by that employer.

This case is important in Alberta because the Alberta Human Rights Act also requires that an employer not discriminate on the basis of age in hiring.


This case involved a 60-year-old lawyer who had worked in private practice for many years when he applied for a position with a legal publishing company which provided information for legal planning and human resources professionals.  He was ultimately not selected for an interview and he claimed that in the circumstances this amounted to discrimination on the basis of age.

The hiring process involved the human resources consultant forwarding applications from applicants who appeared to the consultant to meet the qualifications.  Applicants who qualified in follow-up testing by the employer were then offered an interview.

In this round of hiring, there were two positions to be filled.  Two applicants had been selected for testing as promising candidates before the complainant had applied. 

Two days after the complainant applied, a former employee of the employer was offered one of the two positions.

When the complainant applied for the position, he omitted certain information from his application, such as when he became a lawyer and the dates of his earlier jobs.  The application was also unclear as to whether he worked for a firm or was a sole practitioner.

The complainant was soon contacted by the consultant respecting his salary expectations.  He provided a salary range that was lower than what was budgeted for the position.  When the application was forwarded to the employer, the employer had concerns that the salary expectation was unusually low and thought the omissions in his application were strange.  The complainant provided an amended application which clarified the deficiencies. 

Internal correspondence of the employer indicated that although there was interest in the complainant, he might be "overqualified".  The employer emailed the consultant and noted that it was concerned by the fact that he had not been upfront about how senior he was in practice and that his reasons for such a big change provided in his covering letter were not convincing.  The email concluded, "... we'll just keep this application on hold for now until we decide whether to pursue it.  I'll keep you posted."  Soon after, the employer notified the consultant that they had interviewed one of the applicants who had applied before he had, that she was a hopeful candidate and they intended to interview the other previous applicant as well.

The next day, the complainant emailed the consultant asking when he could expect to hear about an interview.  The consultant responded, "... unfortunately they did not select your application at this time."  When asked whether this was due to his credentials being out of date, the consultant responded, "I don't have all the feedback on everyone yet, individually, but it is looking like they are moving toward candidates that are more junior in their experience and salary expectation."

Further correspondence between the employer and the consultant indicated that the job would be offered to one of the applicants who had applied before the complainant, and if she refused it, the other previous applicant.  The correspondence also notes that if they both refused the position, they would consider whether to test the complainant.

The position was taken by one of the applicants, who quit a week later.  The other applicant had accepted a job in the meantime, and the position was ultimately filled by a writer who had previously held the position.  The complainant was not contacted and soon filed the complaint of age discrimination.


Age Discrimination

The tribunal noted first that there was no direct evidence of age discrimination because there was no evidence of anyone stating that he would not be hired because of his age.  It then considered whether purely circumstantial evidence could establish discrimination in this case.

The tribunal noted that the complainant's burden was to establish that it was more probable than not that age was a factor in the decision to refuse to provide the complainant with an interview, and adopted the following test for whether there was prima facie discrimination in hiring on the basis of age:

a) That the applicant was qualified for the particular employment;

b) That the applicant was not hired; and

c) That someone no better qualified but lacking the distinguishing feature which is the gravamen of the human rights complaint subsequently obtained the position.

The tribunal noted that the complainant was clearly qualified for the position, as were the other applicants, but the other applicants were significantly younger.

The tribunal found that the employer had shown an interest in the two prior applicants before the complainant applied and that the employer had legitimate concerns with respect to the lack of forthrightness of the complainant, his low salary expectations and his lack of a good explanation for his decision to make a substantial career transition.  The employer had an apprehension that the complainant may not want to stay in the job if he ultimately took it on.  The tribunal noted that these were non-discriminatory reasons to refuse to offer an interview.

The tribunal also considered cases suggesting that "overqualified" was a euphemism for "too old".  The tribunal noted that while this could be evidence of a discriminatory pretext, in this case the context of the concern was the employer's apprehension about why he would in fact want to switch from private practice to this job.  Combined with the fact that the employer had legitimate non-discriminatory reasons to refuse to offer him an interview, the tribunal concluded that age was not a factor in the decision of the employer and thus, discrimination was not established on the part of the employer.

The tribunal found that the consultant's email indicating that the employer was seeking candidates with more junior qualifications and salary expectations was false in that his salary expectations were lower than those of the other applicants and found that this circumstantially suggested a stereotypical assumption on his part that an older person would necessarily want a higher salary and would therefore not be a good candidate.

The tribunal also found that the consultant's email indicating that the complainant had not been selected had prevented the complainant from following up with the employer going forward, which, considering what happened with the position, had an adverse effect on the complainant.  This amounted to discrimination on the basis of age.

Perhaps most importantly, the tribunal attributed the discriminatory act of the consultant to the employer, on the basis that the consultant was acting as the employer's agent.

The tribunal noted that this was not a denial of an interview but the prevention of follow up, which was damage of a more limited nature because it was not guaranteed that he would have been given an interview had he followed up.


The tribunal found that the complainant was not entitled to damages for lost wages, because the ultimate decision-maker was the employer and the employer had not discriminated against him.  However, the tribunal awarded $5000 in damages against the employer for injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect as a result of the consultant's discrimination in providing the complainant with false information on the status of his job application.


Most of the cases in Alberta and otherwise dealing with age discrimination are concerning terminations, retirement and pension policies. 

There are several decisions on point in Ontario and elsewhere, but not many in Alberta.  One example of an Alberta decision involved an employee whose job was discontinued and who was then refused employment in the lower classification that replaced her previous job: Cowling v. Alberta Employment and Immigration, 2012 AHRC 4.

Reiss is important because the employer was found liable for discrimination in employment despite not directly participating in that discrimination; it was not the employer's discrimination but rather that of the consultant. 

The damages were not substantial in this case, but the reasoning suggests that they could be substantial in a slightly different factual context.  If the tribunal had found that the human resources consultant had greater authority in determining which candidates would in fact be given interviews and ultimately hired (i.e. the recommendations were rubber-stamped by the employer), then the human resources consultant could be considered the employer's agent as final decision maker.  Applying the reasoning of Reiss to facts such as these could result in liability to the employer for all lost wages as a result of the discrimination of the consultant.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions