Canada: The Family Law Process: Highway To Hell Or Road To Resolution?

Last Updated: April 17 2014
Article by William Doran

When a relationship breaks down and separation between spouses is imminent, an array of emotions and counterproductive thoughts drive some people to do things they later regret. Sorrow, remorse, jealousy, anger, denial, confusion, shame, despair and fear are all natural responses when security and well-being are threatened. Unfortunately, these responses can lead to impaired judgment at a time when rational decision making is critical. At this stage a "designated driver" is often needed to steer decision making toward the appropriate avenue, allowing those impaired by separation to travel safely and efficiently toward a healthy resolution of their family law issues.

Heath care professionals have a vital role to play when referring patients for legal advice. They have an opportunity to steer their patients away from an adversarial system and toward a family law process that will focus on solutions and wellness. The primary objective of this article is to provide information to health care professionals and their patients about the potential hazards of family court and the alternative processes to dispute resolution. So what is the best road to resolution and wellness?

When a family is in crisis, dealing with the legal issues can be overwhelming. Disagreements in regard to children and financial matters have far too many people hopping in their cars and driving to court. Frequently, this is a reaction rather than a carefully considered option. It is critical that proper consideration be given to alternative dispute resolution avenues prior to a trip to the courthouse. Consider the comments of family court judge, Mr. Justice Harvey Brownstone:

Most separated couples have major disagreements about financial matters or the custody of their children, and still the great majority do not go to court. I believe this is because they understand that family court should be the option of last resort rather than the first place to run to, which is the approach too many people take.1

Exposing families to the adversarial court process has been compared to pouring fuel on the fire. All of the emotions referred to above become inflamed. Rather than moving collaboratively toward solutions, spouses end up farther apart as they formulate positions on the issues that they will argue in the court. Consider the following scenario which occurs shortly after a court action has started.

One spouse brings a motion seeking sole custody of the children. Procedure requires the spouse to provide evidence as to why the court should grant them sole custody. This is done by swearing an affidavit that sets out the facts relevant to the legal issue of custody. This affidavit is sworn to be true in the presence of a lawyer or a Commissioner of Oaths and is served on the other spouse and filed in the court file (which is a public record). All too often this affidavit amounts to a character assassination of the other spouse. This character assassination is usually reciprocated and is sometimes referred to as an "affidavit war", especially when numerous affidavits from friends and family follow. These affidavits are likened to a "snapshot" of every mistake, short coming and character flaw that each spouse can remember about the other through their travels, all contained in one document. The affidavits are then read by a judge who will then hear verbal arguments by, either the spouses themselves (if self-represented), or the lawyers that they have retained to represent them. This is often done in open court in the presence of other lawyers and members of the public. The judge, whose formal training is in the law, will likely have no background or experience in child development, child psychology, or the dynamics of the changing family life cycle.2 It follows that the decision is often upsetting to at least one of the parties and frequently both. At this point in the journey, hurt and bitterness take control of the proverbial steering wheel, driving the parties further down what feels like, the highway to hell. Lost and disillusioned, many will then ask: was there not another way? Is it too late to turn around?

While family court should be the last option for the majority of the population, there are some people who will need the court's protection and assistance in resolving family law disputes. Victims of abuse may need a court order to provide security and protection from further abuse. Those who struggle with mental health issues, power imbalances in their relationship, and/or immaturity, may not be suitable candidates for alternative processes, leaving court as the only option. Unfortunately, the court process can take years before a case is completed. It is a complicated process and can be very expensive. As with all processes, people must conduct a cost/benefit analysis in making their decision.

Below are the alternative dispute processes available in finding a peaceful resolution to family law disputes. Each one should be reviewed with a family law lawyer to find out which process is suitable under the circumstances.

1. Negotiation of a Separation Agreement (Domestic Contract) with the Assistance of Legal Counsel

The objective in negotiating a separation agreement is to arrive at terms that will address the legal issues arising from the breakdown in the relationship. This process will involve retaining lawyers that will facilitate the negotiations and will provide independent legal advice to their respective clients. After exchanging financial information, a four-way meeting may be held to narrow any unresolved issues. If successful, the parties will come away with a signed separation agreement that will be binding on both parties and will govern each party's rights and obligations on such issues as: parenting, child support, spousal support, division of property, responsibility for debts and divorce. A "principled approach" to negotiation is preferential to positional bargaining. Principled negotiation focuses on interests, not positions. This approach to negotiation attempts to generate a variety of possible solutions rather than creating opposing positions on the issues. Not all family law lawyers are trained in principled negotiation. Prior to retaining a lawyer to assist with the negotiation of a separation agreement, people should be encouraged to find out if the lawyer has any formal training in principled negotiation. All collaborative lawyers have been trained in principled negotiation.

2. Collaborative Family Law Process

The objective in the collaborative family law process continues to be the negotiation of a separation agreement. The key difference is both parties and their lawyers sign a contract that requires both lawyers to withdraw their services if a settlement cannot be reached. This means that neither lawyer can provide representation if the matter proceeds to court. It follows that the parties and the lawyers work hard toward a collaborative settlement. Collaboratively trained family law lawyers are committed to: a. reducing conflict in families; b. promoting positive and effective communication between spouses; c. focusing on solutions rather than positions; d. transparency in regard to complete financial disclosure; e. achieving fair and equitable results; f. reviewing rights and obligations according to law; g. representing clients in a collaborative environment; and h. making the process cost-effective.

Collaborative family law may (or may not) involve other professionals such as counsellors and financial advisors who provide expertise in their respective fields. These professionals are also trained to work in the collaborative process and will work alongside the parties and their lawyers. The involvement of these professionals will depend on the complexity of the issues and whether or not the parties can afford these additional services. The collaborative process usually involves a series of meetings with the parties and the lawyers with a view to identifying interests and finding solutions. The parties may break off and meet with the financial advisor, either together or separately, to work on financial disclosure. They may also have separate meetings with the counsellor to address psychosocial issues that may be relevant to advancing the matter toward settlement. The collaborative process is successful when the parties commit to finding solutions rather than creating conflict and ends with a signed separation agreement.

3. Mediation

The objective of the mediation process is for a neutral person to assist the parties in arriving at their own settlement. It follows that the ultimate decision making is left in the hands of the parties. The neutral person should have formal training as a family law mediator, which is usually confirmed by certification. The mediator must be neutral on all the issues and cannot provide legal advice to either party. In most cases people attend mediation without lawyers. It follows that each party will need to retain their own lawyer to provide independent legal advice on the issues which are subject to the mediation. If settlement is achieved, most mediators will draft a separation agreement that each party will take to their respective lawyers for independent legal advice. Each lawyer will then review the separation agreement with their client to make sure that the terms therein are clearly understood and to provide legal advice on the issues. If the parties are in agreement, the separation agreement is then signed by each party and witnessed. The lawyer usually signs a certificate of independent legal advice confirming their client understood what they were signing and were not under any undue influence or pressure to sign it. When retaining lawyers to provide independent legal advice, strong consideration should be given to retaining lawyers trained in the "principled approach" so not to frustrate the settlement efforts of the parties and the mediator.

Mediation is a voluntary process that is often successful when two mature adults commit to resolving their differences by focusing on solutions rather than legal positions. The parties will sign a Mediation Agreement, which will usually state that everything discussed in mediation cannot be used in court in the event that mediation is unsuccessful. This could mean that the parties are starting from ground zero if the matter does proceed to court.

Like with other processes, mediation is not for everyone. Victims of abuse are often not good candidates for mediation. Most mediators will screen each party separately with a view to determining if mediation is a suitable process. If a power imbalance in the relationship exists, the involvement of lawyers in the mediation process may address this concern.

4. Mediation/Arbitration

The objective of mediation/arbitration is to provide a process for settlement, but also for adjudication in the event that mediation is not successful. In other words, any issue that is not settled during the mediation phase will then be ruled upon during the arbitration process, provided both parties have waived section 35 of the Arbitration Act (the provision that prevents a mediator from subsequently acting as an arbitrator). The arbitration process is similar to court, in that, the arbitrator, after hearing all the evidence, will make a binding decision on the issues according to the rules of evidence and law. It follows that each party should have a lawyer for the arbitration phase.

The arbitrator's decision is binding and can be enforced under section 59.8 (5) (a) of the Family Law Act. Prior to the commencement of the process, the parties will sign a Mediation Arbitration Agreement. In that Agreement, they will waive their right to litigate their issues in court. What is attractive about the mediation/arbitration process is that settlement or a final decision will be achieved in a relatively short period of time, especially when compared to the court process (which can take years in some cases). Furthermore, most cases settle during the mediation phase. The knowledge that a binding decision will be rendered if mediation fails motivates most parties to settle. Mediation/arbitration is a voluntary process that requires both parties to enter into a Mediation Arbitration contract. Unlike mediation alone, once a Mediation Arbitration Agreement is signed, both parties are bound to the process and waive their rights to litigate in court. This may be the best process if there is a risk that one party has an interest in delaying proceedings. Again, having lawyers trained in the "principled approach" will allow the parties a greater opportunity to find resolution during the mediation phase.

Finding the road to a healthy resolution of family law issues requires professional guidance. Family breakdown can be a devastating, debilitating event that has substantial implications for families and society as a whole. It is therefore critical that separating spouses be guided, as much as possible, away from the adversarial court process and toward an alternative dispute resolution process that will focus on harnessing negative emotions that get in the way of solution focused thinking. Consider the potential fallout when healthy processes are overlooked and court becomes the first course of action:

a) Employment: missed work days, a leave of absence, termination of employment;

b) Education: missed school days, diminished academic performance, disruption when children change schools;

c) Health: anxiety, depression, physical illness, suicide;

d) Judicial System: criminal charges due to assaults and/or uttering threats, overwhelmed and underfunded family court system;

e) Economics: legal costs; medical costs; diminished net worth; diminished spending power, consumer proposals, bankruptcy.

It follows that early intervention is crucial if this fallout is to be avoided or at least minimized. Health care providers have an opportunity to provide a valuable service by referring their patients to lawyers who have been trained in principled negotiation and are mindful of how destructive court can be. Avoid the highway to hell.


1 Mr. Justice Harvey Brownstone, Tug of War – A Judges Verdict on Separation, Custody Battles and the Bitter Realities of Family Court (Toronto: ECW Press 2009) at 11.

2 Ibid., at 1.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

William Doran
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions