In a recent decision, Kelly v. University of British
Columbia, 2013 BCHRT 302, the BC Human Rights Tribunal awarded
a complainant $75,000 in damages for injury to dignity, feelings,
and self-respect. More than double the previous highest award of
$35,000, this award sets the new high water mark for this type of
Dr. Kelly was a medical school graduate who was admitted to
UBC's residency program in November 2005. He suffered from ADHD
and a non-verbal learning disability, and he experienced challenges
in the program as a result. Ultimately he was fired in August 2007,
prior to completing the program, and was given two months'
The impact of the termination on Dr. Kelly's career was
significant: because he had not completed the program, he was not
qualified to practice medicine. He had no choice but to abandon his
life-long dream of becoming a family physician and try to find a
new career path. He conducted an extensive job search, but he faced
numerous questions about why he was not practising medicine. He
also suffered from depression and loss of self-esteem, and his
relationship with family and friends was negatively impacted.
The Human Rights Tribunal found that UBC had discriminated
against Dr. Kelly based on his disabilities and it awarded Dr.
Kelly $385,000 in damages for lost income, as well as a gross-up
for taxes, and various related expenses. The Tribunal then
considered the claim for damages for injury to dignity, feelings,
and self-respect. Recognizing that these awards are fact-specific
and highly contextual, the Tribunal determined that the gravity of
the effects of the termination in this case required an award that
was beyond what the Tribunal normally orders. An award of $75,000
was determined to be appropriate in these circumstances.
Normally awards for injury to dignity, feelings, and
self-respect are modest, and it is rare to see cases where they
exceed $25,000. Employers may see this decision as an unsettling
precedent for significant awards in future cases. However, there
are some unique factors in this case which make it somewhat of an
anomaly. Dr. Kelly was particularly vulnerable as he lost his
opportunity to practice medicine, a goal that he had spent years
and significant resources pursuing. He lost his sense of
self-identity, and suffered from depression and isolation as a
result of his termination. Few complainants will be as vulnerable
as Dr. Kelly, and most instances of discrimination will not result
in such severe and far-reaching consequences.
UBC has applied to the Supreme Court of British Columbia for
judicial review of this decision. We will report on the result of
the judicial review application when the court makes a
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Unfortunately, reasonable accommodation for employees in the workplace continues to be the source of significant litigation and even today we continue to see outrageous examples of employers behaving badly.
We are now beginning to see reported cases involving charges and subsequent fines laid against employers for failing to provide information, instruction and supervision to protect a worker from workplace violence.
On October 13, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave to appeal an Ontario Court of Appeal decision which ordered an employer to pay a former employee 37 months of salary and benefits following termination.
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).