Canada: Life Sciences Insights + Developments


The life sciences industry is a key contributor to the Canadian and global economies. In the pursuit of competitive advantage, participants in the pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device and diagnostic, and health-care services sectors have seen significant growth attributed to major leaps in technology and an unprecedented demand for health-related goods and services. This growth has paralleled the expansion and imposition of more stringent regulatory requirements, improvement of market access, aggressive patent acquisition and enforcement, strategic M&A activity, and increased product liability claims and other litigation.

This report highlights insights and developments relating to a wide range of legal, business and consumer issues currently impacting the life sciences industry in Canada and abroad. These highlights were prepared by Blakes based on non-confidential information gathered in our practices, as well as through a review of publicly available information. Through a series of articles, we examine the implications of some of the recent legal developments impacting the sector, including the Supreme Court of Canada's decision to uphold Ontario's ban on private-label generic drugs, the enforcement of prohibitions on pharmacy-related loyalty points in B.C., the Competition Bureau's ongoing consideration of competition among pharmaceutical companies, and recent trends in Canadian litigation. We also discuss issues relating to the navigation of transfer-pricing rules, protecting intellectual property in the development of combination products, and obtaining financing for new product development and business expansion efforts. Supplementing our discussion of these matters are snapshots of consumer-facing and market trends, including integrated patient care and direct-to-consumer sales.



The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC or Court) delivered its highly anticipated decision (Katz Group Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Health and LongTerm Care)) on private-label products on November 22, 2013.

The Court unanimously upheld the validity of the regulations to the Ontario Drug Benefit Act (ODBA) and the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act (DIDFA) (together, the Regulations) that essentially ban the sale of private-label products in the private and public markets in Ontario. This decision effectively means pharmacies that operate in Ontario will not be able to sell drugs purchased from manufacturers they control if the manufacturers do not also fabricate the drugs.


Before 2006, generic manufacturers typically provided rebates to pharmacies as an incentive to purchase the generic manufacturer's product. Due to the government's belief that these rebates increase the cost of generic drugs to both public and private payers, the Ontario Ministry of Health amended the ODBA and DIDFA and the Regulations in 2006 to prohibit rebates. However, the Ministry of Health thought industry was circumventing the rebate prohibition and responded with more amendments in 2010 (the 2010 Amendments) to further restrict the benefits manufacturers could provide to pharmacies. The 2010 Amendments prohibit not only professional allowances, but also private-label products from being listed in the Ontario Formulary or designated as interchangeable. Inclusion in the Formulary or designation as interchangeable is not required to legally sell a drug in Ontario, but for many generic drugs, inclusion and/or designation is a prerequisite for commercial success. This is why the 2010 Amendments have been referred to as banning private-label products even though such products can still legally be sold in Ontario.

The Katz Group (which controls Rexall and Pharma Plus pharmacies) (Katz) and Shoppers Drug Mart (Shoppers) had taken steps to set up their own private-label manufacturers. Sanis Health Inc., which was incorporated by Shoppers for this purpose, applied in 2010 to list several generic drugs in the Formulary and to have them designated as interchangeable. The Ministry of Health rejected the application on the grounds the drugs were private-label products. Shoppers and Katz both challenged the Regulations as being ultra vires on the grounds that they were inconsistent with the purpose and mandate of the ODBA and the DIDFA. The pharmacies were successful in the Divisional Court, but the Court of Appeal reversed the decision.


In upholding the relevant provisions of the Regulations as valid, the SCC held that in order for Shoppers and Katz to be successful in their appeal, they must show that the Regulations are inconsistent with the objective of the enabling statute. The Court determined that the overarching purpose of the ODBA and the DIDFA is to control the cost of prescription drugs in Ontario without compromising safety and that, in the past, rebates and professional allowances had driven up drug prices. The Court found that the purpose of the 2010 Amendments relating to private-label products was to prevent another possible mechanism for circumventing the ban on rebates that had kept drug prices inflated. Justice Abella held:

In banning rebates, the expectation was that manufacturers would lower Formulary prices, and that pharmacies would pass these savings on to consumers. If pharmacies were permitted to create their own affiliated manufacturers whom they controlled, they would be directly involved in setting the Formulary prices and have strong incentives to keep these prices high. Rather than receiving a rebate financed by inflated drug prices, the pharmacy would share in the manufacturers' profits from those prices. This was expected to keep the price of drugs to consumers high.

Shoppers and Katz argued that the Regulations were inconsistent with the statutory purpose because they neither could nor would reduce drug prices, since the price at which drugs are reimbursed by the Ministry of Health is independently set. The Court rejected this argument on the basis that whether the Regulations ultimately prove to be successful in reducing drug prices or represent sound economic policy does not answer the question of whether they are consistent with the statutory purpose of the legislation.

The Court determined that the provisions in question were consistent with this purpose through "ensuring that pharmacies make money exclusively from providing professional health care services, instead of sharing in the revenues of drug manufacturers by setting up their own private label subsidiaries." The Court reasoned that if pharmacies were permitted to create their own private label subsidiaries whom they controlled, they would be directly involved in setting Formulary prices and have strong incentives to keep those prices high.

Shoppers and Katz also argued that the Regulations are inconsistent with the statutory purpose because they are under-inclusive since they do not prevent a pharmacy from owning a manufacturer that is also the fabricator of the drug. The Court rejected this argument on the basis that this corporate structure does not currently exist in Ontario, and the government is not obliged in its regulations to anticipate all potentially problematic scenarios for it to be consistent with its statutory purpose. The Court noted that this may become a corporate structure of concern; however, the government is entitled to address this problem in stages.

The SCC dismissed Shoppers and Katz's appeal.


Although it is only Ontario law in issue, given the size of the Ontario market, this decision has consequences nationally since manufacturers and pharmacies may choose not to pursue privatelabel product arrangements in Canada at all due to the impact the Regulations will now have on a product's overall commercial success.

Pharmacy chains may feel the financial impact of this decision as it was expected they would use the extra revenue from the private-label product model to recover profits lost as a result of the prohibition on rebates and professional allowances. This decision comes at a particularly critical time as an even greater use of generics is expected given the number of blockbuster brand-name drugs coming off patent.

As the law currently stands in Ontario, pharmacies are not prevented from owning a manufacturer that is also the fabricator of the drug. We may see large pharmacy chains exploring this corporate structure, similar to Jean Coutu Group Inc.'s acquisition of Pro Doc Ltd., a manufacturer of generic drugs, six years ago. Since the Ministry of Health deliberately did not choose to ban products with this type of corporate structure in its 2010 Amendments, presumably the Ministry of Health does not object to this type of corporate structure. Only time will tell.


The Canadian Competition Bureau (Bureau) has publicly indicated its intention to advocate for increased competition in different sectors of the economy, and senior officials have recently identified the health sector as an area of focus for the Bureau. The Bureau's focus on the health sector has been reflected in a number of its initiatives this year:

  • Workshop in the Pharmaceutical Sector. In November 2013, the Bureau hosted a one-day invitation-only "Workshop on Antitrust Issues in the Pharmaceutical Sector." The panellists at the workshop discussed a number of topics concerning how competition law applies to different conduct in the pharmaceutical sector, including the application of competition law to pay-for-delay settlements. "Pay-for-delay" settlements are payments made in settlement of pharmaceutical patent infringement proceedings by a plaintiff originator to a defendant generic in return for the generic agreeing to delay its entry into the market with a competing pharmaceutical product. Among others, the event was attended by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's assistant director from its Health Care Division. The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that pay-fordelay settlements were subject to and could violate the U.S. antitrust laws.
  • Scrutiny of Regulations of Health Professionals. In December 2013 remarks, the Commissioner of Competition (who leads the Bureau) made reference to the Bureau's "ongoing review of restrictions on advertising imposed by certain self-regulated professions on their members, namely pharmacists, dentists and veterinarians." One example of this ongoing review may have been the Bureau's December 2013 submission in response to a consultation of the Alberta College of Pharmacists (ACP) concerning proposed amendments to its Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics. The proposed amendments would prohibit pharmacists from providing an inducement on the condition that an individual receives a drug or a professional service. (An inducement would include, among other things, time-limited discounts and loyalty points or rewards that retail chains offer to consumers). The Bureau's submission noted that, based on its review of the ACP's consultation documents, the ACP may not have empirical evidence to conclude that negative consequences can be associated with the offering of such inducements by pharmacists to consumers. The Bureau noted that given consumers' income constraints, inducements offered by pharmacists may "translate into greater purchasing power for consumers, particularly for low income Canadians...." The ACP has not yet published a response to the Bureau's response or indicated how, if at all, it intends to amend its proposed rules.

The College of Pharmacists of British Columbia also passed new rules in December 2013 prohibiting pharmacists from offering incentives to customers. Sobeys quickly filed a petition for judicial review seeking to have the court quash these new rules. Sobeys alleges, among other things, that the rules violate the Competition Act. In early January, the British Columbia Supreme Court denied Sobeys' application for an interim injunction against the College of Pharmacists' new rules.

  • Revised Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines. At a June 2013 roundtable with members of the bar, senior officials from the Bureau indicated that the Bureau may revise its Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines (IPEGs), in part to reflect more modern thinking about the interface between intellectual property law policy and competition law policy that has developed since the original publication of the IPEGs in 2001. The IPEGs provide that where conduct is "something more than the mere exercise of an IP right," the Bureau will scrutinize such conduct under the "general provisions" of the Competition Act (that is, the abuse of dominance, cartel and other general antitrust provisions). Where, however, conduct "involve[s] the mere exercise of the IP right and nothing else," then the Bureau will instead scrutinize such conduct under section 32 of the Competition Act. The "mere exercise" of an intellectual property (IP) right would include, for instance, the patentholder's decision whether or not to practise its patent or license its patent. The "mere exercise" of an IP right does not include, for instance, a patent-holder's licensing practices if they were arrived at through an agreement with a competitor or a patent-holder's transfer of its IP rights. Under section 32, it is very difficult for the Bureau (through the Attorney-General) to obtain an order in respect of the exercise of an IP right, and the IPEGs explain that the Bureau would only seek to obtain such an order "only in very rare circumstances." In the entire history of the IPEGs, the Bureau has never sought an order under section 32 of the Competition Act.

We anticipate that public discussion about the application of competition law in Canada to the health-care sector will continue in 2014, as will the Bureau' efforts to make known its views in this important area. Enforcement action in this sector by the Bureau also remains a real possibility.

To view the full article, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.