Canada: Environmental Damages - Observations from the Supreme Court of Canada

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law - October 2004

In June, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its decision in British Columbia v. Canfor (known as the Stone Fire case), which considers a government’s right to recover environmental losses, such as the loss of a protected natural area and related values. This decision is important because it recognizes environmental losses as recoverable damages within the common law and it examines the supporting principles. However, on the facts of this case, no environmental losses were awarded to the government of British Columbia. Nonetheless, the door remains open for future litigants to claim environmental losses. In our view, this will be of most significance to government claimants, but it also creates opportunities for public interest class actions and expanded claims by First Nations. For a discussion of this case at the B.C. Supreme Court and Court of Appeal levels, see Blakes Bulletin on Environmental Law, October 2003.

The Facts

In 1992, a forest fire caused by Canfor destroyed about 1,500 hectares of public forest land in northern B.C., including trees located in certain environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) that were protected from commercial logging. The protected trees bordered along Stone Creek, which was used as a source of drinking water and fish habitat. These trees were set aside to protect water quality and control floods and erosion. In 2003, the B.C. Court of Appeal ruled that the ESA trees were worth one-third of their commercial value. This decision was contrary to the trial court’s finding that any loss of the ESA trees was included in the province’s claim for expenses related to fire suppression and restoration. These expenses were found to be $3.5 million and were the only damages awarded at trial. At trial, the province had also claimed damages for the loss of the harvestable trees and the ESA trees.

On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, Justice Binnie, writing for the majority of the Court, observed that the following three issues were raised by the appeal: (i) the Attorney General’s ability to recover damages for environmental loss; (ii) the requirement of proof of such loss; and (iii) a principled approach to the assessment of environmental compensation at common law.

The Recovery of Environmental Damages

The Supreme Court began its decision by noting that the "question of compensation for environmental damage is of great importance." In particular, this case considers the government’s role as both a landowner and the protector of the public interest in an unspoiled environment, as well as its role as regulator of the forest industry by establishing a scheme for revenue generation for forest harvesting activities. Canfor argued that the B.C. government’s right to recovery is limited by its own regulatory scheme, that is, the government is no ordinary landowner and, by establishing the stumpage system for revenue generation under the Forest Act, its only entitlement was to revenue loss. In this case, Canfor stated that there was no shortfall in revenue caused by the fire. This view prevailed before all levels of Courts hearing this matter, including the Supreme Court, which determined that the B.C. government was unable to establish any compensable revenue shortfall.

Notwithstanding success on the revenue loss issues, Canfor also argued that environmental damages were exclusively the domain of the legislature. The Supreme Court disagreed. Based on the notion that the common law is rooted, since Roman times, in the concept that public rights in the environment reside in the Crown or the government, the Court acknowledged the right of the province to seek monetary compensation for the loss of public resources. On this fundamental point, Justice Binnie found that there was no legal barrier to the province of B.C. suing for compensation. However, he observed that the converse was also true and that the province could be held liable due to its inactivity in the face of threats to the environment. In this regard, the "public" would be the potential claimant against the government given the Court’s remark that such potential liability is related to the "existence or non-existence of enforceable fiduciary duties owed to the public."

However, in this case, the province’s claim on some broader "public" basis was not fully argued. Justice Binnie observed that such cases raise important and novel policy questions that the Court need not consider in this appeal. Instead, the ability of the government to claim environmental losses for the ESA trees was limited by the way it framed its case as a landowner. The last part of the decision deals with considerations about quantifying the damages claimed by the B.C. government. This entitlement, the Court stated, was necessarily limited by the role the B.C. government adopted in its claim, namely that of landowner rather than as protector of the public interest.

Proof of Loss and Related Principles

The Court examined whether the province as landowner can recover compensation equivalent to the regulatory "stumpage" (or harvesting "tax" payable to the province) on the ESA trees, essentially a measure for lost revenue to the province, or some other measure of commercial value, including a premium. While accepting that a "commercial basis" could form a "floor value" for the ESA trees, the Court concluded that, on the facts of this case, no such damages were proven. As noted above, all courts hearing this case accepted that there was no revenue shortfall. Thus, the commercial value basis was a non-starter. With respect to the province’s claim for a 20% premium for the ESA trees above their commercial value, the Court concluded that this claim, while apparently trying to occupy the moral high ground, was overly arbitrary and simplistic and commented as follows:

"Less arbitrary techniques, which may or may not win eventual support in the courts are available and will have to be carefully considered when and if properly presented."

As a result, the Court left for another day how exactly environmental damages can be proven. The Court said these are matters to be explored by appropriate experts at trial as to the assessment of compensable loss (not just proof of physical damage). Justice Binnie observed that the quantification of such loss need not be based on "airy-fairy" valuations, as argued by Canfor,

or on the inclination to mete out rough justice and punish the wrongdoer, a principle endorsed by the province. He stated that fairness is the guiding principle and it is "best achieved by avoiding both undercompensation and overcompensation".

In its final paragraph, the Court highlighted that, in the absence of statutory intervention, courts must proceed cautiously on the basis of proper evidence:

". . . there is no reason to neglect the potential of the common law, if developed in a principled and incremental fashion, to assist in the realization of the fundamental value of environmental protection. However, the Court cannot act on generalizations and unsupported assertions. In the absence of statutory intervention, the Court must proceed cautiously. We do not have the basis in this record to proceed further at this time."

Finally, three judges (of nine) wrote a dissenting opinion, finding that there was a revenue loss for the harvestable trees. In addition, the dissent held that the ESA trees had intrinsic value at least equal to their commercial value, despite their non-commercial use. Despite admitting the persistence of "significant flaws" in the evidence, these judges accepted that the commercial value could serve as a yardstick to measure the appropriate damages. However, they agreed with the majority that in this case a premium award was not in order.


The government’s authority to seek damages on behalf of the public for environmental losses remains open for decision in a future case. As a result, companies engaged in carrying out forest activities need to be aware that they are now potentially at risk for paying damages for the loss of environmental values associated with carrying out these activities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.