Canada: Common Questions, Not Answers: Supreme Court Of Canada Affirms Quebec's Flexible Approach To Authorization Of Class Proceedings

Last Updated: January 28 2014
Article by Genna Wood

In its first decision of the New Year, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the Québec Court of Appeal's ruling in Vivendi Canada Inc. v. Dell'Aniello, finding that the commonality requirement for authorization of a class proceeding under the Québec Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) is met if there is a common question that will resolve a significant portion of the dispute; it is not a requirement that common answers be found. The Court's decision affirms the flexible nature of the approach to the commonality requirement on a motion for authorization in Québec.


In 2008, the spirit producer Vivendi Canada Inc. (Vivendi), made unilateral amendments to its health insurance plan (the Plan) of which it is the sponsor for its retirees and their surviving spouses. The amendments came into effect in 2009, and were adverse to the interests of the plan beneficiaries. Mr. Dell'Aniello, a retiree of Vivendi, brought a motion for authorization to commence a class action pursuant to article 1003 of the Code, to challenge the validity of the Plan amendment.

Article 1003 of the Code sets out four requirements that must be met for the Court to authorize a class action:

1003. The court authorizes the bringing of the class action and ascribes the status of representative to the member it designates if of opinion that:

(a) the recourses of the members raise identical, similar or related questions of law or fact;

(b) the facts alleged seem to justify the conclusions sought;

(c) the composition of the group makes the application of article 59 or 67 difficult or impracticable; and

(d) the member to whom the court intends to ascribe the status of representative is in a position to represent the members adequately.

Article 1003(a) is analogous, although broader and much more flexible, to the requirement set out in section 5(c) of Ontario's Class Proceedings Act, 1992 that "the claims or defences of the class members raise common issues".

The Decisions Below

The motion judge held that the members of the proposed group did not raise questions that were "identical, similar or related" as required by article 1003(a). He found that individual inquiries were required to determine whether the right to insurance benefits in retirement had vested for each group member. As a result, the potential class would fall into five subgroups based on each individual's time of retirement, communications received from Vivendi, and documents within their possession. He held that the unilateral Plan amendment did not apply to those who retired before July 15, 1985, which constituted 20% of the individuals in the group. The motion judge also found that because the proposed group members lived across six different provinces, 22 separate analyses would be required to answer the purported common questions. For these reasons, he found that the requirements in article 1003 had not been met and dismissed the motion.  

The Québec Court of Appeal overturned the Superior Court's ruling, finding that the motion judge erred in his interpretation of the common element requirement of article 1003(a), and that the question of whether the 2009 amendments were valid or lawful was common to the claims of all class members of the group. The Court of Appeal also found that the motion judge further erred by overstepping his role at the authorization stage and ruling on the merits of the claim through his finding that the right to insurance benefits had vested for some group members. The Court of Appeal relied on the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Western Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton for the proposition that questions which are common to all members of the group can coexist with questions that concern individuals.

As the Court found that the prima facie case requirement of article 1003(b) was met, and Vivendi admitted that 1003(c) and (d) were met, the Court of Appeal overturned the ruling in the Superior Court and authorized the class proceeding. Vivendi appealed.

The Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Court of Appeal was right to intervene because the motion judge had erred in his assessment article 1003(a) of the Code for two reasons. First, the inquiry under article 1003(a) is purely procedural, and does not require consideration of the merits. Second, the motion judge applied the wrong methodology by asking whether there were common answers to the questions raised in the motion for authorization rather than determining whether the claims advanced by the members of the proposed group raised common questions.

The Court reviewed the principles set out in its earlier decisions in Dutton and Rumley v. Colombie-Britannique with respect to commonality, acknowledging that the common law tests must be adapted to the broader, more flexible and less stringent statutory provisions in Québec, a province which has generally favoured easier access to class actions. In affirming the flexible nature of the test, the Court held:

To meet the commonality requirement under article 1003 the applicant must show that an aspect of the case lends itself to a collective decision, and that once a decision has been reached on that aspect, the parties will have resolved a not insignificant portion of the dispute... All that is needed in order to meet the requirement of art. 1003(a) C.C.P. is therefore that there be an identical, related or similar question of law or fact, unless that question would play only an insignificant role in the outcome of the class action. It is not necessary that the question make a complete resolution of the case possible. In short, it can be concluded that common questions do not have to lead to common answers.

On this basis, the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that motion judge was mistaken in emphasizing the individual questions that would need to be resolved. The fact that the employees worked in six different provinces would not bar the action, as courts can accept proof of, or take judicial notice of, the law applicable in common law provinces. Only substantial differences between the applicable legal schemes would cause a class action to lose its collective nature.

The appellants argued that an interpretation of article 1003(a) that encouraged a multiplicity of substantive analyses violated the principle of proportionality recognized in article 4.2 of the Code. The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that as the criteria of article 1003 are exhaustive, the principle of proportionality is not to be considered as a fifth criterion. The Court noted that the Code is clear that a motion judge must authorize the class proceeding if the criteria are met and need not ask if a class action is the most appropriate procedural vehicle.  

Since the claims of all group members were based on the Plan, the Supreme Court held that the question of the validity or legality of the 2009 amendments arose for all members. As the answer to that question could serve to advance the resolution of all claims, there was a common question, satisfying the requirement in article 1003(a). The appeal was dismissed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions