Canada: Eligibility For Input Tax Credit ("ITC") Claims On Initial Public Offering ("IPO") And Placement Expenses – And Beyond

Last Updated: January 13 2014
Article by Jamie M. Wilks and Carl Irvine

To prevent tax cascading, the GST/HST legislation generally offers registrants the ability to claim ITCs under section 169 of the Excise Tax Act (the "ETA") to recover GST/HST payable or paid on business costs and inputs, including ones that are on capital account.

Conflicting Jurisprudence

In A&W Trade Marks Inc. v R ("A&W"),1 the Tax Court of Canada (the "Tax Court") allowed a registrant's ITC claims to recover GST paid on expenses incurred in relation to an IPO to raise funds to invest in the registrant. In the recent case of PDM Royalties Limited Partnership v R ("PDM"),2 the claimant sought to claim ITCs to recover GST paid on fees for services incurred in structuring and selling income fund units. However, unlike in A&W, in PDM the Tax Court disallowed the ITC claims, finding that the claimant was not the "recipient" of the taxable supplies of services.

Facts in PDM

PDM Royalties Limited Partnership (the "LP") carries on the business in Canada of acquiring, owning and licensing intellectual property rights (i.e., making taxable supplies) relating to certain franchised restaurants. The LP, therefore, engages in a "commercial activity". The limited partner of the LP is a trust (the "Trust"). The LP raises funds for its operations through an income fund trust (the "Fund"). The Fund engages in making exempt supplies of financial services relating to investing in securities, issuing Fund units to investors, and issuing debt securities. As such, the Fund is not engaged in a "commercial activity".3

In 2004, the Fund conducted an IPO of its trust units. In 2005, the Fund raised additional monies with a private placement of its trust units (the "Placement"). In each case, there were a series of additional transactions involving financing and investment in the Trust and LP units. The LP claimed ITCs to recover GST paid on IPO and Placement expenses relating to acquiring professional legal, accounting and assurance services, trademark and other intellectual property valuation services, printing, publishing, and public listing on the TSX, and to remunerating and reimbursing the Fund's trustees (collectively, the "IPO and Placement Supplies").

General Principles for Claiming ITCs

In PDM, the Tax Court applied the principles for determining ITC eligibility enunciated in General Motors of Canada Limited v R (the "GM Canada Decision").4 While the GM Canada Decision has been overturned by the legislative amendment with respect to the particular issue in dispute in that case, the general principles set out in that decision for determining ITC eligibility remain good law.

In the GM Canada Decision, the Tax Court outlined the following three conditions to be satisfied under section 169 of the ETA in order to claim ITCs to recover GST (or HST) payable or paid on an expense:

  1. the claimant must have acquired the property or services that gave rise to the ITC claim;
  2. the GST (or HST) was paid or payable by the claimant; and
  3. the property or service was acquired for consumption, use or supply in the claimant's "commercial activity".5

Application of Principles in PDM

In PDM, the Tax Court found that for the purpose of the first condition set out above, the person who "acquired" a taxable supply of property or service effectively meant the "recipient" of that supply. The "recipient" of a supply is generally the person who is contractually liable to pay the consideration to a supplier under the agreement with the supplier.6 As the LP was not the "recipient" of the IPO and Placement Supplies under the relevant supplier agreements and, therefore, did not satisfy the first condition above, the Tax Court denied the ITC claims made in respect of the IPO and Placement Supplies.

In reaching this conclusion, the Tax Court considered the Financing Agreement entered into among the LP, the Fund, the Trust (the LP's limited partner) and the LP's general partner. Under the Financing Agreement, the parties agreed that the expenses relating to the IPO and Placement Supplies would be "incurred by or on behalf of" the LP. The LP argued that under Financing Agreement, the LP is the "recipient" of the IPO and Placement Supplies. The Tax Court rejected this argument because the suppliers of the IPO and Placement Supplies did not agree to make their supplies under the Financing Agreement (in fact, these suppliers were not parties to the Financing Agreement).

Under separate Administration Agreements entered into by the LP with each of the Fund and the Trust, the LP agreed, as Administrator and agent, to assume responsibility for the administration and management of the Fund's and the Trust's general and administrative affairs. The LP was required to pay the "remuneration and expenses" of the trustees of both the Fund and the Trust. For its services under each of the Administration Agreements, the LP was entitled to annual fees, not to exceed $25,000, from each of the Trust and the Fund (although such fees were never actually collected).

According to the Tax Court, the Administration Agreements supported the Crown's contention that the Fund was the recipient of the IPO and Placement Supplies. In entering into contracts with suppliers as agent on behalf of the Fund, as provided for in the Administration Agreements, the LP "created direct contractual relationships between the Fund and the service providers whose invoices are at issue. It was the Fund, as principal, who was contractually liable to pay under the agreements with the suppliers and it is the Fund who was the recipient of the services provided and who acquired the services."7 The Tax Court rejected the LP's argument that the conduct of the parties evidenced an unwritten agreement that the LP would incur the expenses on its own behalf as principal and this unwritten agreement should supersede the Administration Agreements.8

Although the above conclusions were sufficient for the Tax Court to find that the LP was not entitled to claim the ITCs for the IPO and Placement Supplies, the Tax Court gave an additional reason why the ITCs could not be allowed. In the Tax Court's view, "the services were not used by the [LP] in the course of its commercial activity." That is, the third condition above was unsatisfied.9 Even if the LP were considered the "recipient" of the IPO and Placement Supplies, "it cannot be said that the expenses were used in the course of its commercial activities."10 The Tax Court concluded that the "services purchased by these expenses were not used by the [LP] in the course of its commercial activities. They were used by the Fund."11

Reconciliation of PDM with A&W

The LP argued that the A&W precedent should be followed and applied in PDM. In fact, the LP admitted that the income fund structuring in PDM was modeled on the one in A&W.12 In PDM, the Tax Court distinguished A&W from the current case in two ways.

Firstly, the Tax Court observed that "in A&W, it was found that the taxpayer acquired the goods and services." In PDM, on the other hand, the LP (ITC claimant) acquired the IPO and Placement Supplies as agent on behalf of the Fund. The Administration Agreements in PDM were "similar to but not the same as the administration agreement in A&W." Notably, in A&W, the administrator, who claimed the ITCs, did not incur the relevant expenses as agent on behalf of the A&W Income Fund, but incurred them as principal on its own account.13

Secondly, the Tax Court noted that "it is not clear from the decision [in A&W] whether it was argued that the expenses in question were related to the provision of exempt supplies by the income fund." In A&W, the Tax Court did find linkage between the expenses incurred by the ITC claimant and the claimant's commercial activities. As noted in PDM, the "Court in A&W found that the taxpayer "acquired the goods and services to enable it to borrow money in order to carry on its commercial activities"." In this regard, the Tax Court distinguished PDM from A&W. In PDM, the LP's expenses were linked with partnership units issued in exchange for financing (i.e., exempt supplies of financial services) rather than any commercial activities of the LP.14

Lessons from PDM

To justify their ITC claims, claimants need to structure their transactions appropriately. Ironically, while the LP and its legal counsel apparently took care to model the transactions in PDM after the structure in A&W,the LP's ITC claims were disallowed. While the Tax Court in PDM did distinguish the two decisions, to the extent that they do conflict, PDM would likely have greater precedential authority given that it was decided under the General Procedure (whereas A&W was decided under the Informal Procedure.)

In the appropriate case, section 185 of the ETA might prove useful to an ITC claimant. Where a non-financial institution registrant acquires business inputs directly linked to making exempt supplies, but "that relate to commercial activities of the registrant," the inputs are deemed to be acquired by the registrant "for consumption, use or supply in the course of those commercial activities" and, therefore, eligible for ITC claims pursuant to section 169 of the ETA.15

The principles enunciated in PDM go beyond the context of IPOs and other means of raising capital for business ventures. For example, as a matter of ordinary business practice, borrowers reimburse their lenders' legal expenses. If the borrower indemnifies the lender for these expenses, but has no direct liability to the lenders' legal counsel, then the borrower would apparently be ineligible to claim ITCs to recover the GST/HST payable on the lender's legal fees.

If, on the other hand, the borrower enters into a 3-way agreement with the lender and its legal counsel to pay the legal fees of the lender's counsel directly, then it is possible that the borrower could access ITCs to recover the GST/HST payable on the legal fees (assuming that the borrower is engaged in a "commercial activity"). Such structuring could result in the borrower being considered (1) to be the "recipient" of the legal services supplied (by the lender's legal counsel) and (2) to acquire such legal services. The 3-way agreement would need to take into account special considerations, such as the protection of solicitor-client privilege between the lender and its legal counsel.

Footnotes

1 A&W Trade Marks Inc v R, 2005 CarswellNat 2815, 2005 TCC 493, [2005] GSTC 149 (TCC [Informal Procedure]).

2 PDM Royalties Limited Partnership v R, 2013 Carswell Nat 3090, 2013 TCC 270, [2013] GSTC 105 (TCC [General Procedure]).

3 Under subsection 123(1) of the ETA, a "commercial activity" means inter alia a business carried on by a person, except to the extent to which the business involves making exempt supplies by the person. In addition, if the person is an individual, a "personal trust" or a partnership with only individuals as partners, the business must be carried on with "a reasonable expectation of profit" to constitute a "commercial activity".

4 General Motors of Canada Limited v R, 2008 CarswellNat 454, 2008 TCC 117, [2008] GSTC 41, at paragraph 30 (TCC [General Procedure]), affirmed 2009 CarswellNat 880, 2009 FCA 114, [2009] GSTC 64 (FCA).

5 Supra, footnote 3.

6 Definition of "recipient" in subsection 123(1) of the ETA, notably in paragraph (a).

7 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 31.

8 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 29.

9 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 34.

10 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 42.

11 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 43.

12 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 45.

13 Supra, footnote 2, paragraph 46.

14 Ibid. Consider whether paragraph 185(1)(b) of the ETA could have deemed the expenses to be for consumption, use or supply in the claimant's commercial activities and, therefore, eligible for ITC claims. This point is discussed further in the last Section of this article.

15 In Mac's Convenience Stores Inc. v The Queen, 2012 TCC 393, the Tax Court of Canada broadly interpreted and applied paragraph 185(1)(b) of the ETA to justify and allow the appellant's ITC claims.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2014 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Jamie M. Wilks
Carl Irvine
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions