Canada: The Untidy Intersection Of The CCCA And MOE Orders: Recent Clarification By The Court Or Appeal In Re Nortel And Re Northstar

Last Updated: December 10 2013
Article by James Desjardins and Aaron Baer

On October 3, 2013, the Court of Appeal for Ontario (the "Court") released its rulings in Nortel Networks Corporation (Re)1 ("Re Nortel") and Northstar Aerospace Inc. (Re)2 ("Re Northstar"), two decisions that help clarify when regulatory orders issued by the Province of Ontario (the "Province") become provable claims subject to the restructuring process of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act3 (the "CCAA"). A provable claim is any valid claim or liability of a creditor that can be compromised under a plan of arrangement in CCAA proceedings. Remedial orders issued by the Minister of the Environment (the "MOE") may be reduced to monetary provable claims that can be compromised in CCAA proceedings only where (i) the Province has performed the remediation work and advanced a claim for reimbursement; or (ii) the obligation may be considered a contingent or future claim because it is sufficiently certain that the Province will do the work and then seek reimbursement.


The decisions of the Court in both Re Nortel and Re Northstar were rendered after the decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (the "SCC") in Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc.4 ("AbitibiBowater"), in which the SCC examined when MOE orders become classified as provable claims under the CCAA.

AbitibiBowater involved remediation orders issued by the Minister of Environment and Conservation of Newfoundland and Labrador after the applicant, AbitibiBowater Inc. ("Abitibi"), was granted protection from its creditors under the CCAA. The remediation orders were in respect to multiple sites, many of which had been expropriated by the province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

In reaching its decision, the SCC analyzed subsection 11.8(9) of the CCAA, which sets out three requirements for establishing a provable claim:

  • . there must be a debt, liability or obligation to a creditor;
  • . a claim must be founded on an obligation that falls within the time limit for claims; and
  • . it must be possible to attach a monetary value to the obligation.

With regards to the third requirement, the SCC noted at paragraph 30 of AbitibiBowater that, "the question is whether orders that are not expressed in monetary terms can be translated into such terms." In making that determination, the SCC held that courts must consider the substance of a remediation order, rather than its form, to determine whether there are sufficient indications that the regulatory body that made the remediation order will ultimately perform the remediation work itself.

In AbitibiBowater, the province's Minister of Environment and Conservation had no realistic alternative but to perform the work itself. The province had expropriated most of the properties and remained the owner. As it was sufficiently certain that the province would do the work and then seek reimbursement, the regulatory order was held to be a provable claim subject to the CCAA restructuring process.

It is against this backdrop that the Court analyzed Re Nortel and Re Northstar.

A) Re Nortel

In the late 1990s, Nortel Networks Corporation ("Nortel") identified various environmental impacts that arose from its past operations at a number of Ontario sites. On January 14, 2009, Nortel was granted protection from its creditors under the CCAA. At that time, Nortel had disposed of its interests in all of its sites (the "Disposed Sites"), except for a partial interest in its London site (the "London Site").

After Nortel's CCAA filing, the MOE issued remediation orders (the "Orders") for the Disposed Sites and the London Site that would require further expenditures of approximately $18 million.

On March 9, 2012, Mr. Justice Morawetz of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) found that the Orders were subject to the stay of proceedings contained in the initial order (the "Initial Order") and, therefore, had to be addressed as provable claims in the CCAA proceeding.

On June 22, 2012, the MOE was granted leave to appeal the decision to the Court. While the appeal was pending, the SCC released its decision in AbitibiBowater which, unfortunately for Mr. Justice Morawetz, was not available when His Honour rendered his decision.

B) Re Northstar

The MOE issued two remediation orders against the respondents (collectively, "Northstar") in early 2012. Northstar subsequently sought and obtained protection from their creditors under the CCAA in June 2012. A CCAA judge approved the agreement for the sale of substantially all of Northstar's assets in July 2012. Northstar's contaminated site in Cambridge was not included in the sale.

Northstar advised the MOE that if the sale of its assets was approved, Northstar would abandon its contaminated site in Cambridge and terminate the remediation work. Not surprisingly, no bidder was interested in purchasing the Cambridge location. After Northstar went bankrupt and the trustee abandoned the Cambridge property, the MOE commenced remediation activities at the Cambridge site.

2. COURT OF APPEAL: Re Nortel and Re Northstar

A) Re Nortel

The ratio of AbitibiBowater was set out by Juriansz, J.A., writing for the majority of the Court, at paragraph 31 of Re Nortel:

"As I read [AbitibiBowater], the Supreme Court's decision is clear: ongoing environmental remediation obligations may be reduced to monetary claims that can be compromised in CCAA proceedings only where the province has performed the remediation work and advances a claim for reimbursement, or where the obligation may be considered a contingent or future claim because it is "sufficiently certain" that the province will do the work and then seek reimbursement."

With this in mind, the Court bifurcated its analysis to those of Nortel's properties that would satisfy the test in AbitibiBowater and become a provable claim and those that would fail.

The Orders regarding the Disposed Sites were directed to the current and former owners of the properties, as well as Nortel. At the Kingston site, the current and former owners named in the Orders were jointly and severally liable with Nortel to carry out the activities required by the Orders. Section 18 of the Environmental Protection Act (Ontario)5 gave the MOE the power to make orders against the other current and former owners of the Disposed Sites, in addition to Nortel.

As a result, the Court concluded that the MOE Orders in relation to the Disposed Sites were not provable claims subject to the restructuring process under the CCAA. Applying the test in AbitibiBowater, it was not sufficiently certain that the MOE would perform the remediations ordered.

Conversely, the Court found that Nortel's retained portion of the London Site was worth less than the cost of remediation and that it was probable that the London Site would eventually be abandoned without being sold. The Court considered it sufficiently certain that the MOE would ultimately be forced to undertake Nortel's obligations under the Orders. As a result, the MOE's claim was held to be a provable claim that could be compromised in accordance with the CCAA – the effect being that the MOE does not, with respect to the London Site, have priority over Nortel's assets.

The MOE's appeal to the Court was allowed. Mr. Justice Morawetz's declaration that the Orders were stayed by the Initial Order was modified such that the declaration only applies to the London Site. The MOE Orders in relation to the Disposed Sites were not established to be provable claims; such Orders are regulatory orders and are not subject to the insolvency claims process under the CCAA.

B) Re Northstar

In light of its analysis in Re Nortel, which was incorporated by reference, the Court held that, in conducting the remediation activities, the MOE made it sufficiently certain that the Province of Ontario would do the work and then seek reimbursement. Therefore, the MOE orders were, in substance, provable claims subject to the CCAA restructuring process.



The case law in Ontario appears to be settled: ongoing environmental remediation obligations may be reduced to monetary claims that can be compromised in CCAA proceedings only where the Province has already performed the remediation work and then advances a claim for reimbursement, or where it is sufficiently certain that the Province will do the work and then seek reimbursement.

Under the CCAA, MOE orders that have become provable claims will be paid in accordance with the priority under the CCAA and can be compromised. The MOE does not have priority with respect to the debtors' assets. On the other hand, MOE orders that have not become provable

claims are not subject to the rules and requirements of the CCAA and, in those circumstances, the MOE enjoys priority over the debtors' assets.


Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act6 (the "BIA"), MOE orders that become provable claims will be paid in accordance with their priority under that statute. Unlike the CCAA, however, the BIA imposes a timing restriction on claims: subsection 121(1) of the BIA requires claims to be founded on an obligation that was incurred before the date of bankruptcy. Given the challenges of identifying the date on which environmental damage occurs, the BIA lacks the temporal flexibility of the CCAA that is needed to establish environmental claims.

C) Directors' Liability

The directors and officers of insolvent companies that contaminate the environment are not immune from liability. The MOE held the former directors and officers of Northstar (the "Former Directors") responsible for the environmental damage caused by Northstar, even though much of the contamination occurred prior to the tenure of any of the Former Directors named in the order.

On October 21, 2012, the MOE issued a remediation order against the Former Directors alleging that they had management and control of the Cambridge site and the related remediation systems. After an unsuccessful appeal of the MOE order, immediate liability was imposed on the Former Directors. On October 28, 2013, the Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal accepted the Minutes of Settlement between the MOE and the Former Directors. The Former Directors agreed to pay $4,750,000 to the MOE in exchange for the withdrawal of the MOE order that had imposed liability on the Former Directors for the remediation of the Cambridge site.

The MOE has shown a clear willingness to hold directors and officers liable in cases where a company is unable to finance the remediation costs. Directors and officers may be held liable for environmental contamination, regardless of whether they were directly involved in the contaminating activities. It would be prudent for directors and officers to ensure they are properly insured against such liabilities. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether these recent decisions will dissuade talented individuals from serving as directors or officers of organizations.

* Aaron Baer is an articling student at Aird & Berlis LLP


1 2013 ONCA 599.

2 2013 ONCA 600.

3 RSC 1985, c C-36.

4 2012 SCC 67.

5 RSO 1990, c E.19.

6 RSC 1985, c B-3.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

James Desjardins
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.