Canada: Online Defamation – The Curtain Lifts On Anonymous Postings

In a recent Alberta court decision, anonymous electronic postings of defamatory material not only were actionable but also warranted a higher damage award.

Can authors of anonymous and defamatory postings in an Internet chat room or on a bulletin board avoid legal action? If not, what is required to prove the identity of the author? And, what types of damages may be awarded by a court? 

These were some of the interesting issues in a recent Alberta case involving anonymous yet defamatory online postings. This case illustrates the unique evidentiary burden on plaintiffs in proving the identity of an e-mail sender.


The plaintiffs were Calgary oil and gas production company Vaquero Energy Ltd. (formerly known as Westminster) and its President and CEO Robert N. Waldner, who had been hired to consolidate the business. During the consolidation, the price of the stock fell significantly.

In 2002, the plaintiffs learned there were defamatory messages being posted in the chat room of, a Web site providing financial information to subscribers. In its chat rooms or "bullboards," people post messages about stocks. Waldner and others found messages from "napo9" that included disparaging remarks about the company and Waldner’s management.

The postings dated from February to July, 2002. Later, similar messages were posted by "alec6."They accused Waldner of being insane, retarded, managing the company for his own benefit, comparing him to Osama bin Laden and others, and so on. When Waldner discovered the extent of the postings, he consulted legal counsel, who undertook investigations to identify the author. The defendant, Nick Weir, was later identified as the sender of all the messages.

Weir was no stranger to the company.Waldner had met him at an investors’ lunch in Toronto and Weir had once asked to be on the Vaquero board of directors.

Once Weir was identified, he was served with a Statement of Claim. The postings stopped that very day.


The plaintiffs in this case had to prove the identity of the sender of the e-mails. At trial in Alberta’s Court of Queen’s Bench, a Stockhouse representative gave evidence on the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses of the sender of the e-mails. Stockhouse records showed the identity of the person registered as "alec6" as Alec Hamilton. The person registered as "napo9" was shown as John Smith. The password for both was the same: "123456".There was no independent verification of either identity by Stockhouse.

All of the IP addresses were traced to Interface, a Toronto Internet service provider. Their records linked the addresses to a router for several companies, including Currah Capital. An Interface representative then testified that he specifically recalled manually installing one of the IP addresses on Weir’s laptop computer at Currah Capital.

An expert in computer forensics and the Internet explained to the court how IP addresses are like a telephone number. They identify where information came from and, if the IP address and the date and time an e-mail is sent is known, the computer that sent it can be traced. If the address comes from a router, though, more information is needed to trace the message back to one computer.

Weir testified on his own behalf at trial, claiming he did not send the e-mails. While he was a business consultant and shared office space with Currah Capital, three other people worked there and had access to his computer. They, he claimed, had stock holdings in Westminster or Vaquero and could have lost money during the consolidation process.

The court later noted that, in cross-examination, Weir was evasive as to whether he also owned stock in Westminster or Vaquero, but finally admitted he did.

And, he admitted that after this claim was commenced, he launched a class action in Ontario against Vaquero. At first, he said it was because of bad management at the company, but then conceded it was really to see if Vaquero would discontinue its claim if he stopped the class action. In fact, there was a consent dismissal of the class action. He also admitted at one time he wrote asking to sit on the Vaquero Board of Directors. 

Weir also called an expert in computer forensics, who gave evidence about "spoofing" or the theft of another person’s IP address. This, he said, can be done in at least two ways. If a thief had access to Weir’s computer, in a few seconds, he or she could determine the IP address and use it on another computer. The other way would be to install "Trojan" software that basically hijacks the computer for its own purposes. In cross-examination, the expert said IP address theft has resulted in police relying less on this method to find e-mail senders and more on other evidence.


In its decision, the court outlined three major issues in this action. As in any defamation case, the first is whether the statements in the postings are defamatory. The court held they were clearly defamatory and noted there was not much argument from the defendant on that point.

The second issue is whether the defendant sent the e-mails. Even though he denied it, the court was satisfied after hearing the evidence and arguments that he had sent them.

The plaintiffs argued they had proven, on a balance of probabilities, that it was Weir. They pointed to the fact that most of the "alec6" e-mails were directly traceable to Weir’s computer, which leads to a reasonable conclusion that other e-mails sent via the router were connected to Currah Capital.

Weir also knew about Vaquero and showed more than a passing interest in the company. Notably, the e-mails stopped on the day Weir was served with the claim.

As for Weir’s suggestion that someone spoofed his IP address, the plaintiffs successfully argued it did not make sense. Over time, there were three different IP addresses for the e-mails and someone would have needed either a Trojan on Weir’s computer or to go to his office each time to get the IP addresses after they were changed.

The court said there wasn’t any evidence a Trojan was installed and it is highly unlikely a thief would know when the IP addresses changed.

The court also noted the defendant made much of the fact that the plaintiffs had originally planned to apply to have his computer seized for evidence, but never did. However, the court said if the computer could have proven him blameless, it was up to him to offer it as proof.

The third issue was the amount of damages. Factors to be considered included:

  • The plaintiff’s position and standing
  • The nature and seriousness of the defamatory statements
  • The mode and extent of publication
  • The absence or refusal of any retraction or apology; and
  • The whole conduct and motive of the defendant from publication through judgment.

The court considered each point. First, the court concluded the e-mails were sent at a critical time in the life of Vaquero and Waldner’s career. He was in the process of restructuring Vaquero and bad publicity would have been harmful.The purpose of the e-mails was to attack that process. Second, the e-mails were particularly vicious as well as insensitive to those suffering mental disabilities.

The third point, dealing with the mode and extent of publication, is particularly important.There were 48 e-mails sent over a period of four months. On the Internet, said the court, anonymous postings can be very destructive since readers cannot know the author’s motives. For example, if a defamatory article is published in a newspaper with a wellknown political bias, a reader takes that into account. When an e-mail is anonymous, a reader is not able to discount comments made and there is a greater risk that the defamatory remarks will be believed, which aggravates the defamation.

The court also agreed that Internet publication is worldwide and instantaneous, with the capacity for republication in limitless numbers and being permanently accessible in electronic databases.

Finally, the court noted there has never been a retraction or apology by the defendant.


The court ruled an award of $10,000 to the company was appropriate since there was no evidence the e-mails caused economic damage to Vaquero. Waldner, however, was awarded damages of $40,000.The court said the e-mails severely attacked his reputation, were vicious and caused him real concern.

The plaintiffs did not seek aggravated damages, but did request punitive damages. The court did not disappoint them and, after considering recent case law, agreed that punitive damages should be awarded in situations where the defendant’s misconduct is so malicious, oppressive and high-handed that it offends the court’s sense of decency.

Here, the court said the words were particularly malicious and awarded punitive damages to Waldner of $25,000. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions