Canada: Hail To The Chief: McLachlin C.J.C. Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice

Next month marks the bicentennial of the birth of Sir William Johnstone Ritchie, one of the first judges appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada and Chief Justice from 1879 to 1892. Why are we thinking about him this week? Until today, he was the longest serving Chief Justice of Canada. That title now belongs to Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, who has held the position since January 7, 2000. Having served on the Court for nearly a quarter century – most of that time as Chief Justice – her impressive legacy to date includes the development of the law in a wide and varied range of areas. She has also used her position to forge a remarkable degree of consensus on the Court and to publicly highlight important issues facing the administration of justice.

To celebrate this historic milestone, Canadian Appeals Monitor has taken a look at McLachlin C.J.C.'s jurisprudential legacy to date – both before and after her appointment as Chief Justice – and identified 10 key cases in which she has had a direct and lasting role in shaping the law as it applies to Canadian businesses and professions. Her judgments in these areas rarely receive the attention of the media, who tend to focus instead upon her important decisions regarding constitutional and criminal issues. However, as demonstrated by the cases below, McLachlin C.J.C. has also had a profound influence upon the development of the private law.

Norsk and Bow Valley

The recovery of pure economic loss in negligence is one of the most controversial and difficult subjects in the law of torts.  As Cardozo J. famously remarked in Ultramares Corp. v. Touche, 255 N.Y. 170 (1931), such cases, more than any other, create the potential for "liability in an indeterminate amount for an indeterminate time to an indeterminate class".  In Canadian National Railway Co. v. Norsk Pacific Steamship Co., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 1021, McLachlin J. (as she then was) laid the groundwork for a principled approach to this area, by rejecting an automatic exclusionary rule for pure economic loss and holding instead that the controlling concept is "proximity", broadly defined.  While the position taken by McLachlin J. in Norsk differed from that of La Forest J. (who would have imposed a presumptive exclusionary rule for contractual relational economic loss), she later unified the two approaches in Bow Valley Husky (Bermuda) Ltd. v. Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1210.  The resulting rule – that recovery for contractual relational economic loss is presumptively excluded in the absence of a categorical exception, subject to the recognition of a new exception based on policy reasons – has been applied by the Supreme Court ever since: see, e.g., Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 860 and Design Services Ltd. v. Canada, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 737.

Cooper and Edwards

As Norsk and Bow Valley suggest, one of the areas in which the Chief Justice's contribution to the development of private law has been most notable is her work on the duty of care and how it should be applied to novel negligence claims.  In November 2001, the Court released two unanimous companion judgments – Cooper v. Hobart, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537 and Edwards v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 562 – in which the Chief Justice and Major J. put "a gloss" on Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.), "revisited" the Anns test and provided guidance on the proper role of policy considerations in assessing tort liability and "proximity."  The Chief Justice elaborated upon these ideas in later judgments – notably Childs v. Desormeaux, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 643, Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129 and R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45 – and has consistently been the driving force behind the Court's clarification of these important concepts.

Resurfice and Clements

Two appropriate companions to the Chief Justice's judgments in Cooper and Edwards are decisions in which she clarified the causation standard to be applied in negligence claims.  Her unanimous judgment in Resurfice Corp. v. Hanke, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 333 confirmed that the but-for test is a "fundamental rule" that "has never been displaced."  This was in the face of considerable confusion caused by arguments that the "material contribution" test represented a new, more relaxed approach to causation.  The Chief Justice returned to this issue in Clements v. Clements, [2012] 2 S.C.R. 181, where her majority judgment clarified that a "material contribution" approach to causation is appropriate in rare cases involving multiple tortfeasors if the negligence of the defendants is the but-for cause of the plaintiff's loss, but the plaintiff cannot show that one particular defendant was the likely cause.

BG Checo

In addition to torts, the Chief Justice has made several significant contributions to the law of contracts.  Perhaps her most notable judgment in this regard is BG Checo International Ltd. v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 12, where she delivered joint majority reasons with La Forest J. that greatly simplified the rules for when a plaintiff can sue in both tort and contract for conduct that gives rise to concurrent liability in each.  The BG Checo approach – that the right to bring concurrent claims exists in any case where the contract does not clearly indicate otherwise – stands as an important affirmation of the primacy of private ordering.  McLachlin J.'s judgment in BG Checo is also noteworthy for its pragmatic approach to reconciling inconsistencies in different parts of an agreement, and for clarifying the different measures of damages in contract and tort.  It joins a long line of other contract cases authored or co-authored by the Chief Justice,in fields as diverse as insurance, partnership, joint ventures and employment law: see, e.g., Nichols v. American Home Assurance Co., [1990] 1 S.C.R. 801, Reid Crowther & Partners Ltd. v. Simcoe & Erie General Insurance Co., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 252, Continental Bank Leasing Corp. v. Canada, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 298, Fidler v. Sun Life Assurance Co. Of Canada, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 3, Jedfro Investments (U.S.A.) Ltd v. Jacyk, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 679, and RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., [2008] 3 S.C.R. 79.

Dutton, Hollick and Rumley

Perhaps no decisions of the Chief Justice have had a greater impact upon businesses than the seminal class actions trilogy of Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, [2001] 2 SCR 534, Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 SCR 158 and Rumley v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 SCR 184.  These cases have come to define the test for certifying class actions in Canadian provinces outside Quebec.  Virtually all of the foundational concepts in class certification – the "plain and obvious" standard for whether the pleading discloses a cause of action, the requirement for a "colourable claim" and a "rational connection" between the proposed class and the common issues, the two-part test for preferability, the focus upon access to justice, judicial economy and behaviour modification, the notion of "systemic" liability, and above all, "the curious requirement of 'some basis in fact'" (as Justice Cullity has called it) – can be traced to these unanimous decisions by McLachlin C.J.C. It is difficult to identify another area of the law in which a single Canadian judge has had so much influence.

Honourable Mentions

Not surprisingly, our efforts to compile a "top ten" list of the Chief Justice's decisions led to much discussion and debate given the wide array of contenders.  Some particularly notable judgments that were not included in our list are:

  • Canadian National Railway Co. v. McKercher LLP, 2013 SCC 39, which unanimously revisted the "bright line" conflicts rule for lawyers and their clients;
  • Grant v. Torstar Corp., [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, which modified the traditional law of defamation to recognize the defence of "responsible communication";
  • Canada Trustco. Mortgage Company v. Canada, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601, written with Major J., which offered a unanimous (and then-unprecedented) interpretation of the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) under the Income Tax Act;
  • Wallace v. United Grain Growers, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701, an influential dissenting judgment which dealt with the relevant factors in the calculation of wrongful dismissal damages and the existence of an implied duty of good faith in employment termination; and
  • Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762, which reconciled the "principled" and "categorical" approaches to restitution, and defined the nature of "benefit" in the test for unjust enrichment.

Having often publicly reiterated her desire to serve until reaching the age of mandatory retirement, the story of the Chief Justice's ultimate legacy on the Court remains to be told.  It is clear, however, that the media's understandable focus on her contributions to the development of public law in Canada tells only half of the story, and overlooks an important and lasting part of her contribution to Canada's commercial and professional life.

To view original article, please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.