Canada: Human Rights Tribunal Of Ontario Hints At Broadening Employer Liability

While we recently provided an update on the limits of the duty to accommodate, three recent decisions of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (Tribunal) serve as a reminder of the Tribunal's broad discretion to award damages where warranted. 

The Tribunal in Morgan v Herman Miller Canada Inc1 awarded a complainant damages not because discrimination had taken place, but because the employer failed to investigate the complaint of discrimination.

In Fair v Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board2, the complainant received an award that included reinstatement and nine years of back pay after the Tribunal found a breach of the Ontario Human Rights Code (Code).

In Monrose v Double Diamond Acres Limited,3 the Tribunal awarded a migrant worker no longer living in Canada significant damages for a violation of his dignity and a breach of his right to be free from reprisal.

Morgan v Herman Miller Canada Inc. (Herman Miller)

The applicant in Herman Miller complained to the Tribunal that he had suffered discrimination and harassment because of his race. He alleged he was routinely assigned menial tasks outside of his job description, was required to work outside regular business hours, received an email with racist overtones, was unfairly put on probation, was denied an investigation of his complaints and, when he was terminated, was retaliated against.

The Tribunal did not agree that the applicant had been discriminated against. It found that the applicant's job position was new and evolving and the job advertisement for his position made clear that work may have to be performed outside regular work hours. In addition, the Tribunal found that the employer was a small company that expected all its employees to help with tasks that the applicant viewed as menial.

Although it acknowledged the applicant had been put on probation, the Tribunal found this had occurred because he disclosed confidential information to one of the company's biggest contractors. Finally, the Tribunal found that the impugned email did not contain any racist statements.

While the Tribunal found no discriminatory treatment, it nonetheless found the Code had been breached and awarded the applicant $70,799.70 as compensation for lost wages and injury to the applicant's dignity, feelings and self-respect. The Tribunal based its award on the employer's failure to investigate the applicant's complaint of discrimination and for having terminated the applicant in what the Tribunal concluded was an act of reprisal.

The Tribunal found two issues to be critically important:

  • The applicant raised his concerns about racial discrimination with the employer's human resources manager and director of sales. An email outlining his concerns was forwarded to the president of the company. Despite assurances by the human resources manager that the applicant's concerns would be investigated, no investigation was undertaken.
  • The employer's witnesses offered a number of explanations for the applicant's termination. None of the explanations would give rise to a breach of a protected ground under the Code; however, the varied explanations caused the Tribunal to question whether the termination was actually an act of reprisal against the applicant for having raised his complaint.

The Tribunal made clear it did not have to find that the applicant was discriminated against in order to award damages. It was sufficient that the applicant genuinely believed the respondents were infringing his Code rights and that he had based a complaint that was not investigated (and that ultimately led to his termination) on those beliefs.

Furthermore, the Tribunal noted a complainant does not need to have filed a complaint in writing to his or her employer in order to merit an investigation. The Tribunal was also critical of the fact the employer did not address the applicant's complaint for a month before deciding to terminate him. This caused the applicant a great deal of uncertainty in the period leading up to his termination. The employer was ordered to pay the applicant $15,000 in compensation for injury to dignity, feelings and self-respect.

The Herman Miller case teaches employers two valuable lessons. First, it is important to investigate human rights complaints in a timely manner, whether or not those complaints are deemed "believable" at first blush.

Second, even where a complaint is not well founded, an employer can be liable for terminating an employee for having made the complaint. While a termination for cause may be permissible when an employee makes a complaint that he or she knows to be unfounded, employers are well advised not to terminate an employee when a complaint in good faith is not well founded.

Fair v Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board (Hamilton-Wentworth)

The applicant in Hamilton-Wentworth had been employed as a supervisor of regulated substances, namely asbestos, in the workplace. In 2001, she developed an anxiety disorder related to her fear about the specific responsibilities of her job. Namely, she was afraid that if she made a mistake about asbestos removal in the workplace, she could be held personally liable for a breach of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

The applicant received long-term disability benefits from 2001 until 2004, at which time she was deemed capable of returning to employment. No suitable position into which the applicant could return was identified. The applicant was terminated by the respondent in July of 2004, based on the evidence of their expert that it was unlikely the applicant would be able to return to her position or to a position with the same level of liability.

The Tribunal found that the board should have investigated possible forms of accommodation with regard to the applicant's disability as early as 2002, responded to the applicant's efforts to obtain information about the essential duties of her position for the purpose of obtaining further medical information, attended a meeting to discuss a return-to-work program that had been arranged by the employer's disability benefits provider, and requested clarification where there was ambiguity in the medical information provided by the applicant.

Its failure to do so and its decision to terminate the applicant was a breach of the Code. Especially problematic for the employer was that the applicant had made it clear there were some positions she was qualified to return to—a fact bolstered by the Tribunal's finding that the board had even interviewed her for one such position.

On the date the Tribunal issued its damages award, the applicant had been absent from the workplace for nine years. To compensate the applicant for her losses, the Tribunal reinstated the applicant and awarded her approximately nine years' back pay in the amount of $419,283.89.

The Hamilton-Wentworth decision is an important reminder to employers to take all steps to the point of undue hardship to ensure that employees receive appropriate workplace accommodations. A failure or refusal to do so may result in a significant damages award.

Furthermore, employers may be required to reinstate a former employee even where there are significant delays between the date of a termination and the date the Tribunal hears a complaint of harassment or discrimination. In Hamilton-Wentworth, the Tribunal acknowledged the delay was largely a result of its own processes. Despite this, it awarded the applicant a significant quantum of damages and a return to her former employment. The Tribunal found that no prejudice had arisen in the employer's ability to present its case to the Tribunal and was unwilling to penalize the applicant for delays that were in no way her fault.

Monrose v Double Diamond Acres Limited (Monrose)

In Monrose, the applicant was a migrant worker employed by the respondent under the Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program who was contracted to work from January to September of 2009. He was terminated on June 8, 2009, and sent back to his home country. The applicant alleged he had been terminated as a reprisal for voicing human rights complaints about allegedly discriminatory comments made by both a supervisor and the owner. He also claimed the manner in which he was terminated was discriminatory.

While the Tribunal did not agree that the matter of dismissal was discriminatory, it found that the applicant had been subject to discriminatory comments on the basis of his racial background that gave rise to discrimination against him. In addition, the Tribunal held that his termination occurred as a reprisal for applicant having voiced a human rights complaint to his employers about the discriminatory comment.

Two findings made by the Tribunal are of special interest:

  • The Tribunal found only one instance of a racially discriminatory comment. However, the comment (calling the workers, all Black men, "monkeys") was found by the Tribunal to be so egregious that the single incident triggered a violation of the Code.
  • The evidence of the applicant alleging derogatory comments was not corroborated by other witnesses. However, the Tribunal placed a certain amount of weight on the evidence of an expert in the field of migrant workers who stated that such persons are in a position of great vulnerability. The Tribunal held that this vulnerability could explain the lack of corroboration by other workers.

Consequently, even though there was no evidence to corroborate the allegations of discriminatory comments, the Tribunal awarded the applicant damages of $5,500 for lost wages, general damages of $3,000 for damage to his feelings, dignity and self-respect in relation to the monkey comments, and $15,000 in damages for losses associated with the violation of the applicant's right to be free from reprisal. The Tribunal noted, "The respondents' response to this complaint was not to investigate his concerns but to terminate his employment."

Non-monetary remedies were also awarded. The employer was required to implement a human rights policy with a complaints process approved by the Ontario Human Rights Commission (Commission) and to require supervisory employees to participate in the Commission's online human rights training within 120 days of the Tribunal's decision.

Employers reading the Monrose decision should be mindful of the need to investigate any human rights complaints raised by an employee, and certainly not to penalize an employee making a complaint. The Monrose decision also provides a valuable reminder that even a single act of uncorroborated discrimination can give rise to a violation of the Code. The decision also signals the Tribunal's desire to protect vulnerable workers.

The author wishes to thank summer student Dina Peat for her help in preparing this legal update.


1 Morgan v Herman Miller Canada Inc, 2013 HRTO 650.

2 Fair v Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board, 2013 HRTO 440.

3 Monrose v Double Diamond Acres Limited, 2013 HRTO 1273.

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

Norton Rose Fulbright is a global legal practice. We provide the world's pre-eminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have more than 3800 lawyers based in over 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.

Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members ('the Norton Rose Fulbright members') of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions