Canada: Entreprise P.S. Roy v. Magog: Safeguarding The Equality Of Access To Public Procurements

Last Updated: August 9 2013
Article by Patrick Desalliers and Patrick Girard


On April 9, 2013, the Quebec Court of Appeal issued an important judgment in the field of public procurements in Entreprise P.S. Roy inc. v. Magog (Ville de). Specifically, the QCA held that a past non-compliance provision contained in a request for proposal was arbitrary and thus invalid, as it contravened the fundamental principle that bidders must enjoy equality of access to public procurements. Thus, the Entreprise P.S. Roy ruling ultimately provides aggrieved bidders in public procurements with strong authority to challenge frivolous and arbitrary RFP requirements that have the effect of excluding them from tendering a bid.

Background Facts

In August 2011, the municipality of Magog launched a RFP to obtain snow removal services for the next three winter seasons. One of the admissibility requirement contained in the RFP stipulated that bidders should not have had, in the last five years, a contract rescinded by a municipality for non-compliance with the contractual terms (the "Past Non-Compliance Requirement"). Under the provision, the rescission need not have been the result of a court judgment.

On August 23, 2011, Magog opened the two bids tendered. ABC Excavation was the lowest bidder with a price of 436,626.04$. The only other bid, from Entreprise P.S. Roy, was for 732,485.00$. Several days later, Entreprise P.S. Roy informed a Magog representative that in 2011, ABC Excavation had a contract rescinded by the municipality of St-Denis-de-Brompton. The past rescission was confirmed by St-Denis-de-Brompton.

Regardless, on September 19, 2011, Magog awarded the contract to ABC Excavation, as it received a legal opinion concluding that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement was invalid. Entreprise P.S. Roy challenged the awarding of the contract, arguing that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement was valid and that it was thus the lowest compliant bidder. On October 31, 2011, the Quebec Superior Court rejected the claim. Entreprise P.S. Roy subsequently appealed to the QCA.

Decision of the QCA

The QCA ultimately rejected the appeal and confirmed that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement contained in the RFP was invalid.

Justice Nicholas Kasirer stated that the power of public bodies to stipulate admissibility requirements in RFPs is not unlimited. RFPs must respect the fundamental principle of administrative law to the effect that all bidders have an equal right to contract with the government. It is this principle of equality that restrains public bodies from imposing requirements that have the effect of excluding potential bidders. To that end, courts will intervene if RFP requirements undermine this principle of bidders' equality of access by being arbitrary, frivolous or if their purpose or effect is to circumvent the law. In such a case, there would be an abuse of power by the public body.

In light of this fundamental equality principle, the QCA assessed whether the Past Non-Compliance Requirement was frivolous, arbitrary or had the effect of circumventing the law.

The QCA ruled that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement was not frivolous. Measuring the reliability of a bidder in light of its past record is rational and can help to evaluate if a bidder will be able to fulfill its future obligations. As such, the requirement was relevant.

However, under the arbitrary criterion, the QCA ruled that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement chosen to ensure the reliability of bidders was inadequate. In fact, the requirement had the effect of excluding potential bidders based on a unilateral decision by a third party public body without considering the circumstances of the rescission or allowing the bidder to be heard. Therefore, the impugned requirement did not satisfy the purpose of assessing the bidder's reliability as a future contracting party.

As such, the QCA held that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement breached the principle of bidders' equality of access to public procurements. Therefore, the QCA concluded that the impugned requirement was invalid and that Magog was entitled to reject it.

Having concluded that the Past Non-Compliance Requirement was invalid, the QCA was asked by ABC Excavation to cancel the RFP and to order a new bidding process.

The QCA stated that Magog made an error, albeit in good faith, to insert an invalid requirement in its RFP. The court recognized that such error could have unduly discouraged some potential bidders to enter the bidding fray in mistakenly thinking that they could not comply with the RFP because of the (invalid) Past Non-Compliance Requirement. As a result, although there was no breach of equality between Entreprise P.S. Roy and ABC Excavation, the QCA concluded that Magog's good faith error affected the integrity of the bidding process with respect to bidders potentially interested in participating in the bidding process.

Nevertheless and surprisingly, the QCA concluded that Magog's error did not justify an order for a new bidding process. In the court's view, since there was no evidence that Magog was acting in bad faith to manipulate the bidding process, Magog, as the guardian of the public interest, was better placed than the courts to assess whether it was in the public interest to launch a new bidding process.

The QCA reinforced its above conclusion by noting that no other bidder came forward to complain or request a new bidding process. Thus, according to the Court, the prejudice of the potential bidders was theoretical. Finally, the QCA indicated that Entreprise P.S. Roy could not use the name of potential bidders to plead for the cancellation of the bidding process and ask for a new one.


The Entreprise P.S. Roy case constitutes strong authority for the safeguard of the equality of access to public procurements and provides aggrieved bidders with a great tool to challenge frivolous and arbitrary RFP requirements.

However, the QCA's decision to deny a new bidding process despite its finding that the public authority's good faith error affected the integrity of the bidding process is surprising. It could unfortunately lead courts in the future to require bad faith on the part of public authorities before cancelling a bidding process and ordering a new one. In terms of remedies, the onerous burden of demonstrating bad faith would leave aggrieved bidders in most cases with only damages as a recourse.

It is our opinion that courts should not read the Entreprise P.S. Roy as establishing a principle that bad faith must be demonstrated in order to obtain the cancellation of a bidding process. On this point, the QCA mentioned that the particular context of the case and the very advanced state of execution of the contract militated against an order for a new bidding process, which is an indication by the court that it was not establishing such a principle.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions