Canada: Merger Update Regarding The ING Case

Last Updated: April 23 2004

Pension plan mergers are clearly an area where both the law and the regulatory environment are in a state of flux. Just as we were printing the latest issue of Blakes Bulletin on Pension & Benefits, which features an article on the ING case, the Financial Services Commission of Ontario ("FSCO") issued a new position on asset transfers.

Under the new policy, the Superintendent will only consider consenting to an asset transfer on sale or merger if:

  • none of the pension plans involved is subject to a trust (with or without a written trust agreement);
  • all of the pension plans involved are defined contribution plans with no defined benefit liabilities of any kind; or
  • the applicant can demonstrate that the ING decision does not otherwise apply to the application.

The Superintendent is seeking to intervene in the leave to appeal application to the Supreme Court of Canada in the ING case. The materials that the Superintendent has filed in this regard indicate that the regulator anticipates that very few transactions will fall into the above exceptions.

FSCO appears to be taking an extremely broad view of the possible implications of the ING case. While we strongly disagree with FSCO’s view as to the potential broad interpretation of the ING case and its application to mergers and asset transfers, in general, plan sponsors need to recognize that there is a risk that the Superintendent will refuse to approve mergers and asset transfers. This should be considered in planning for future plan restructuring, acquisitions and divestitures.

It appears that the new policy will be in effect at least until the Supreme Court of Canada has disposed of the ING case (i.e., refused leave to appeal or rendered a final decision).

The ING Case – The Effect on Pension Plan Mergers

A recent ruling of Ontario’s Court of Appeal appears to have cast a dark shadow over the feasibility of merging two or more pension plans of the same or related employers and their corresponding trust funds. A closer reading of the decision, however, reveals a more optimistic conclusion.

Aegon Canada Inc. v. ING Canada Inc. (the "ING case") started with an application to the Ontario Court of Appeal for damages arising from alleged breaches of specific representations and warranties in a corporate share purchase agreement. The primary pension issue to be determined by the courts was whether contribution holidays could be taken in the specific circumstances.

The case arose after Transamerica purchased the shares of NN Life Insurance Company from ING in 2000, but the root cause of the dispute reaches back many years.

NN Life was the product of a 1989 amalgamation between itself and Halifax Life Insurance Company of Canada. Before the amalgamation, NN Life had its own pension plan and Halifax Life was one of two participating employers in the Halifax Plan. The Halifax Plan’s assets were held under a 1969 Trust Agreement which provided, in part, that no amendment could "permit any part of the capital or income of the Fund to be used for or diverted to purposes other than for the exclusive benefit of the Members… ".

It also provided that, on termination of the trust, "the Fund shall be distributed by the Trustees, subject to the provisions of the Plan, amongst the Members in such equitable manner as the Trustees determine."

After January 1st, 1990, the Halifax Life employees became members of the NN Life Plan and certain Halifax Plan assets and liabilities were transferred to the NN Life Plan. The Superintendent of Pensions agreed to approve the transfer of assets provided NN Life undertook to maintain and administer both the assets and transferred liabilities of the Halifax trust separate from the other NN Life Plan assets and liabilities, due to the wording of the 1969 Trust Agreement. Both the Halifax Plan and the NN Life Plan authorized contribution holidays.

From the date the assets were transferred, NN Life maintained the Halifax Life assets and liabilities in segregated funds and in a separate account. Despite this arrangement, the value of the Halifax Life assets was included in determining funding requirements and future current service costs for the entire NN Life Plan.

Between 1989 and 2000, NN Life made no contributions to the NN Life Plan even though, during most of this period, the Halifax assets constituted the entire surplus of the NN Life Plan. Further, actuarial reports disclosed an unfunded deficit in respect of the other members of the NN Life Plan (that is, the members who were not transferred Halifax employees).

What The Lower Court Said

In these circumstances, the first court to hear the matter ruled that the assets transferred from the Halifax Plan to the NN Life Plan remained "impressed" with the obligations of the 1969 Trust Agreement. The court said that the assets could not be used for the benefit of persons who were not beneficiaries of the trust governed by that agreement.

The court also found the partial asset transfer from the Halifax Plan to the NN Life Plan did not constitute a merger of the respective trust funds and that NN Life had expressly undertaken not to merge the trust funds. The court held that, in the circumstances, NN Life could not rely on merger case law to establish that it was permitted to use the Halifax Plan assets to take contribution holidays in the NN Life Plan.

Since the assets transferred from the Halifax Plan could not be used to satisfy other NN Life Plan liabilities, they could not be taken into account when determining contribution obligations. The court found that both the provisions of the 1969 Trust Agreement and the undertaking to The Superintendent of Pensions protected the rights of transferred Halifax Life employees to have the assets of the 1969 Trust Agreement applied exclusively for their benefit.

The trial judge wrote: " … However, the facts recited above make it clear that the effect of the transfer of assets in this case was not to merge the two funds. On the contrary, NN Life undertook expressly not to do so. The keeping of the assets and the liabilities separate and apart from any other pension plan is no mere accounting detail, particularly when the terms of the 1969 Trust are considered. A merger of the 1969 Trust with any other plan would not only breach the undertaking, but would also amount to a prohibited amendment. What actually happened, as correspondence from the PCO cited above indicated, was in practice the maintenance of two plans, with some joint documentary filings. The merger cases do not assist the respondent for in law there was no merger and calling it a single plan does not make it so."

The transferred Halifax Life employees were maintained as a distinct and separate group within the NN Life Plan. Other NN Life Plan members did not become beneficiaries of the 1969 Trust because they were not transferred Halifax Life employees nor were they made members of the Halifax Plan. As a result, based on the terms of the 1969 Trust, NN Life Plan members were not beneficiaries of the 1969 Trust. The case did not end there, however.

What The Court of Appeal Said

The Ontario Court of Appeal agreed with the lower court’s decision and reasoning. The court agreed the terms of the 1969 Trust Agreement precluded the use of the assets for any purpose other than the exclusive benefit of the beneficiaries of the 1969 Trust and that such terms were not altered by the transfer of assets to the NN Life Plan in 1989. The surplus, it said, may only be used in accordance with the terms of the trust.

The appeal court made a point of distinguishing its own 1989 decision in Heilig v. Dominion Securities Pitfield Ltd. on the basis that "it posed a very different issue." That case involved a merger of two plans, one of which had exclusive benefit language that was similar to that contained in the 1969 Trust Agreement in the ING case. The funds of both plans were pooled and "each fund was at risk for the liabilities of the other corporation."

In that case, the court wrote: "I see no reason why the two pension plans of merging companies cannot be merged into one continuing plan just as the two companies amalgamate into one continuing company…It makes no difference that one plan may be in surplus and the other not. There is no obligation for an employer contribution until actuarial figures require it. The merger is not unlike the situation resulting from an expansion of the company staff and a large influx of new members to the plan."

The appeal court also distinguished the recent decision of the Financial Services Tribunal in Baxter v. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services), in part, on the basis that "the provisions of the surplus plan at issue were significantly different from the case at bar as they allowed the employer to use funds amassed prior to a merger if all liabilities have been fully met."

What It All Means

In our view, the better interpretation of the ING case is that it does not prevent all plan mergers, even in circumstances where exclusive benefit language exists in one of the relevant plan or trust documents.

Instead, it suggests that how a plan merger is structured and documented is very important. The court may well have reached a different decision if no undertaking had been given and either:

  • there had been amendments to merge both plans into one continuing plan (instead of a transfer of assets from the Halifax Plan to the NN Life Plan); or
  • the Halifax Plan had been amended to expand the class of members to include the NN Life employees and there had been a transfer of assets from the NN Life Plan to the Halifax Plan.

In both these circumstances, the NN Life Plan members would have become members of the Halifax Plan and, therefore, the provisions of the 1969 Trust Agreement would not have precluded the use of the assets for their benefit. This issue was not before the court in the ING case.

In the ING case, there was essentially a separate group of transferred Halifax Plan beneficiaries who (together with surplus pension assets) were being taken out of the 1969 Trust (which was never amended) and transferred into the NN Life Plan. The other NN Life members were never made part of this transferred group.

The fact that the appeal court made a point of distinguishing the Dominion Securities case as "a very different issue", despite the similarity in the exclusive benefit language in the two cases, strongly supports the view that exclusive benefit language, in and of itself, does not preclude the merger of two plans or corresponding funds, if properly structured. The difference in the two cases is the way in which the "merger" was accomplished.

The references to Baxter in the Court of Appeal’s decision also illustrate how fact-specific the ING case (and other cases in this area) are. The particular wording of the amendment power in each case has a bearing on whether funds may be merged, even where the plan contains "exclusive benefit" language.

The ING case can also be distinguished from most plan consolidations on the basis that NN Life gave an undertaking to the Pension Commission of Ontario to segregate the assets and liabilities. Then, it did, in fact, hold and account for the assets separately for most purposes, but breached its undertaking by treating the Halifax Life assets as being available to fund the benefits of other NN Life Plan members. In this situation, the funds were held to have never been merged and the merger case law was held to be inapplicable. It follows that, in other situations, previous case law, such as Dominion Securities, continues to be relevant.


In our view, the ING case does not prevent the merger of two or more pension plans of the same or related employers and their corresponding funds if, first, no undertaking has been given to the regulators or the plan members to hold and account for the funds separately and, second, any of the following circumstances is true:

  • neither plan is funded by way of a trust; or
  • where any of the plans are funded by trusts, such trusts do not contain "exclusive benefit language"; or
  • the plans and trusts have broad amendment powers which permit their merger – whether or not there is "exclusive benefit language" in either or both of the trusts (as, for example, in Baxter); or
  • the plans have always provided for the participation of affiliates or subsidiaries who elect or are designated to participate in the plan or one of the plans so provides and the members, assets and liabilities of the other plans are transferred to such plan; or
  • the plan with exclusive benefit language (with or without a surplus) has a broad enough amendment power to amend the plan to expand the class of members to include the members of the other plans and there is a transfer of assets from those other plans to the plan with "exclusive benefit language"; or
  • both plans permit amendments to merge them into one continuing plan.

The result in the ING case merely follows from the numerous previous court cases which have said that the determination of trust issues depends on the language of the trust agreements and how the language applies to the facts of the particular case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

3 Nov 2016, Other, Vancouver, Canada

“Risk” is the new black. It’s on the lips of every CEO, CFO, GC and board member — as it should be. Can you spot it? How do you analyze it? Are you equipped to manage it?

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.