Canada: Ontario Court Amends Global Class To Exclude Class Members Participating In U.S. Settlement

On March 19, 2013, Justice van Rensburg of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released her decision in Silver v. Imax ("Imax"), granting the defendants' motion to amend the previously certified class to exclude those class members who held shares purchased on the NASDAQ.  The decision in Imax should provide some assurance to public issuers and their directors and officers, who are regularly defendants in parallel securities class actions in Canada and the United States, that global settlements are not necessary and that settlements reached in the U.S. will likely be respected in Canada and bind class members provided that the settlement is fair to absent class members and is not in disregard of the jurisdiction of the Canadian court. 

IMAX, a Canadian public company whose shares are dual-listed on the TSX and the NASDAQ, is a defendant in overlapping class proceedings in Ontario and the United States. In Ontario, the plaintiffs assert both common law causes of action and secondary market liability under Part XXIII.1 of Ontario's Securities Act (the "Securities Act") against Imax and a number of its directors and officers alleging misrepresentations and omissions in respect of the financial reporting and recognition of revenue for Imax's theatre systems (the "Ontario Action").  In December 2009, Justice van Rensburg certified a global class which included all persons who acquired IMAX shares on the NASDAQ and the TSX and held such shares during the relevant class period. 

Similar proceedings were commenced in the U.S. alleging misrepresentations and omissions regarding revenue recognition in violation of federal securities laws (the "U.S. Action").  As a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. National Australian Bank Ltd., 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010), the plaintiff in the U.S. action was precluded from including purchasers of shares on foreign exchanges in the class.  Accordingly, the U.S. class included only those persons and entities that purchased or acquired IMAX shares on the NASDAQ.  As a result, the overlapping class members in the Ontario Action were those NASDAQ traders who acquired and held their IMAX shares during the class period.

The parties in the U.S. Action reached a U.S. $12 million settlement (the "U.S. Settlement") which had been approved by the U.S. Court, subject to an order amending the class definition in the Ontario Action (the "U.S. Fairness Decision").  Accordingly, the defendants in the Ontario Action brought a motion seeking an order amending the class definition to exclude from the certified class all persons who would be bound by the U.S. Settlement.  If amended, the resulting class in the Ontario Action would be much smaller, comprised of approximately 15% of the global class originally certified.

Justice van Rensburg held that the first step in determining whether to amend the class involved a determination of whether the Ontario Court should recognize the U.S. Fairness Decision.  In making this determination, Justice van Rensburg applied the following factors as outlined by the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Currie v. McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Ltd., (2005), 74 O.R. (3d) 321 (C.A.) for determining whether to recognize a decision of a foreign court approving a class action settlement so as to preclude an action for the same relief in Ontario: (i) the U.S. Court's "real and substantial connection" to the claims of overlapping class members, (ii) whether the absent class members were accorded procedural fairness, including adequate notice, and (iii) whether the interests of the absent class members were adequately represented. 

Justice van Rensburg held that there was no question that there was a real and substantial connection between the cause of action of the overlapping class members and the U.S. Court in that the U.S. Court clearly has a connection to the claims of persons who acquired their shares on the NASDAQ.

Justice van Rensburg also determined that the absent class members were accorded procedural fairness.  In particular, she noted that the notices of the proposed U.S. Settlement (which Ontario class counsel had input into) made specific reference to the Ontario Action, including the options available to overlapping class members, and that electing to remain bound by the U.S. Settlement would bar class members' ongoing participation in the Ontario Action.  Justice van Rensburg concluded that the same factors as would have been considered in Canada were considered by the U.S. Court in its determination that the U.S. Settlement was fair, reasonable and adequate.

In considering whether the interests of the class members sought to be bound by the U.S. Settlement were adequately represented, Justice van Rensburg considered the "race to the bottom" concerns that improvident settlements may result from bargaining between defendants and plaintiff's counsel who are motivated by self-interest in their fees and that a "reverse auction" may occur where a defendant in parallel class actions will pick the most ineffectual class lawyers to negotiate a settlement with, to the detriment of the class members.  Justice van Rensburg rejected these concerns in the circumstances of this case, noting that the U.S. Settlement occurred after 6 years of litigation, extensive documentary discovery and several rounds of negotiation. Justice van Rensburg also rejected the plaintiffs' contention that it was the duty of U.S. class counsel to bring the potential for an enhanced recovery under Ontario law to the attention of the U.S. Court and to justify the U.S. Settlement under Ontario law.

Accordingly, Justice van Rensburg concluded that the U.S. Fairness Decision should be recognized in Ontario.  Justice van Rensburg rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the motion was, in substance, a motion to approve a settlement of the Ontario Action which should have been brought under s.29(2) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 (the "CPA") and noted that the adequacy of the U.S. Settlement was not something for the Court to assess as part of the question of whether to recognize the U.S. Fairness Decision.

Next, Justice van Rensburg proceeded to consider whether the Ontario Action remained the preferable procedure under s.5(1)(d) of the CPA for resolving the claims of overlapping class members who had not opted out of the U.S. Settlement.

Justice van Rensburg ultimately concluded that the Ontario Action was no longer the "preferable procedure" for the determination of the claims of class members whose claims were covered by, and who had not opted out of the U.S. Settlement.  Justice van Rensburg found that there was no real question that the Court's recognition of the U.S. Settlement and the amendment of the class would serve the objectives of behaviour modification and judicial economy.  Rather, the real issues were whether the amendment would further "access to justice" for the overlapping class members and for the members of the class who would remain if the NASDAQ purchasers were "carved out", and whether the order sought would respect the integrity of Ontario's class actions regime. 

In considering the "access to justice" concerns, Justice van Rensburg considered the advantages and disadvantages to litigating the claims in Ontario as opposed to the U.S., and concluded that there was no compelling reason to conclude that the Ontario legal regime would be more favourable.  Justice van Rensburg held that participation in the U.S. Settlement would meet the objective of providing access to justice for the overlapping class members.  The Court also considered access to justice for the remaining TSX class members, including the economic viability of the claims, and noted that the same offer, proportionally, was made available to Ontario class counsel for resolution of the TSX class members' claims.  Justice van Rensburg specifically noted that there is always a risk for class counsel that the costs, time and effort invested in a class proceeding may not be recovered at the end of the day.  The Court rejected the plaintiffs' contention that the relief sought would challenge the judicial integrity of the Ontario Court or alter the typical approach to the resolution of cross-border class actions, noting that the existing framework for cross-border class actions allows for parallel proceedings and does not require global settlements.

Justice van Rensburg concluded that additional factors supported the exercise of the Court's discretion to amend the class, including: (i) the fact the U.S. Court has a strong jurisdictional connection with the matters at issue and, in particular, the fact that it would consistent with the reasonable expectations of overlapping class members that their rights could be determined by the U.S. Court; (ii)  the procedure followed by the U.S. Court was robust and resulted in a settlement that "was assessed as fair by a judge who had case managed the action for several years and was unquestionably familiar with the issues in the proceeding"; and (iii) the U.S. Court gave due attention to the existence of the Ontario Action.

Accordingly, the defendants' motion was granted and the class definition was amended to exclude from the certified class all NASDAQ purchasers who did not deliver an opt-out notice in the U.S. Action.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions