Canada: Public-Private Partnerships: Demystifying the Process

Last Updated: December 16 2003
Article by Donald G Pierce


The use of public-private partnerships (known as P3s) is now well established in Canada at the federal level and in several provinces, notably Ontario, British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Currently, P3s are playing a bigger role in building and capital projects across all areas of government, including power generation, energy delivery, water and wastewater facilities, waste disposal, transportation, communications, education and health facilities, and public service buildings. Recently, its popularity has led to P3s being used more frequently in smaller-scale developments across Canada, such as schools, courthouses, and hospitals.

A. Process Issues

A great deal of thought and planning must go into developing the process that will govern the public-private partnership project. First of all, it is crucial to recognize that there are two distinct worlds that must be addressed when dealing with projects such as these: the business world and the political world.

Creation of a Government Team

The first step and probably the most important is for the government to create a team of experts to run the government side of the project (the "Government Team"). The Government Team’s task is to set up, monitor, and implement the various steps of the process throughout the entire project. The Government Team’s job is to create a process that once established, facilitates the development of a fair business deal while at the same time is, and appears to be, beyond reproach to public scrutiny. It is essential that not only must the business deal be fair, it must appear fair to the skeptical public. Fairness and the appearance of fairness are crucial for the ultimate long-term success of the project, and can only be achieved by the establishment of a fair process.

Who are the players on the Government Team? The team of experts will likely consist of four main groups of consultants: (1) process consultants; (2) legal consultants; (3) technical consultants; and (4) financial consultants.

Process Consultants

This role is generally filled by a large accounting/ consulting firm whose job is to co-ordinate and steer the Government Team so that all the issues are addressed in a comprehensive and efficient manner. The process consultants are essentially the quarterbacks of the process. They assist in setting the rules, the evaluation criteria, the review process, and the selection process.

Legal Consultants

The lawyers on the team are responsible for providing legal advice both on the business transaction and on the process. As such, the lawyers must be experienced in all aspects of the business deal, fully understand the process, and ensure that the process can withstand the most intense public scrutiny. In developing a full understanding of the process, it is then the lawyers’ job to communicate this process to ensure that all members fully understand the potential pitfalls of certain actions. The lawyers want to be constantly anticipating future events and encouraging the other members to do so as well. Importantly, the lawyers must also endeavour to draft the documents in an even-handed manner to ensure lender participation, and an easy, quick closing.

Technical Consultants

The technical consultants are generally comprised of engineers or other technically trained people whose job it is to review the technical proposals and technical issues that arise in the planning stages, and throughout the process.

Financial Consultants

The financial consultants’ specific job is to determine the real costs of the various project proposals, breaking them down into net present values, so that proper analyses can take place.

These four team members must start working together immediately and each member must fully understand the whole process. One of the most consistent themes across projects is that the better the consultants work as a team from the outset and throughout the project, the greater the chance that the project will operate smoothly.

A Well-Defined Process Framework

A properly prepared Process Framework is key to ensuring that all the players proceed with the same view to a defined result. The process framework is the internal government document that defines the procurement and evaluation process for a particular project. It provides detailed evaluation methodologies and criteria, as well as the forms to be used by evaluation teams in the conduct of their evaluations. It incorporates the RFQ (if any), the RFP, and the project agreement(s) by reference. It is real estate, project designed to document to unsuccessful prospective proponents and third parties that the process followed was fair and rationally related to its objectives.

It is important to understand that the framework developed from the outset can either serve to guide the project to fruition with minimal conflict, or through lack of forward thinking and communication, bog down the process at every turn.

Development and Application of Evaluation Methodology and Criteria

The development and application of evaluation methodologies and criteria help to ensure that the selection of the successful proponent is unbiased and rational. It is generally recommended that government develop detailed evaluation methodologies and criteria in parallel with the development of the Request for Qualifications (if any) and the Request for Proposals for the project.

1. The RFQ - The Request for Qualifications/Expression of Interest

An RFQ is used in a two-stage evaluation process to solicit statements of qualifications from prospective proponents in order to generate a short list of eligible proponents. Typical contents of an RFQ include:

  • A detailed description of the opportunity, couched in commercial, rather than legalistic language, as the opportunity should be marketed to prospective proponents in order to generate greater interest and thereby enhance project value;
  • A summary disclosure of information related to the opportunity, with references to sources of more detailed information not contained directly within the RFQ, to allow prospective proponents to decide whether the opportunity is suitable to pursue, and if so, with whom they should partner;
  • The procurement schedule, including submission deadlines, especially with respect to the RFQ stage if not also with respect to the RFP stage; and
  • Evaluation criteria and submission requirements in enough detail to provide prospective proponents a reasonable opportunity to prepare a formally and substantially viable and compliant statement of qualifications.

A purpose of RFQs in large projects is to control the number and quality of companies entitled to bid on the project. From the Government Team’s perspective, they have to determine from the outset exactly what type of private companies they are looking for and, within that type, which ones might be most qualified for the particular jobs. From the private sector’s point of view, the issue is: how does your company get on this qualifying list?

Generally, there are two dominant criteria that the government uses to determine who is qualified: (1) experience; and (2) financial capability and stability. There are also ancillary criteria that vary in weight depending on the type of project and the political/economic climate.

Experience: The government is looking to the private sector to provide a certain expertise in developing the project. They want to be assured that only highly qualified, highly experienced companies apply for the jobs. These types of projects are not a great opportunity for a local company with little experience to gain experience at the expense of the government. The government wants to be comfortable that the companies bidding are capable of doing the jobs correctly, and the best assurance is to require experience.

Financial Capability and Stability: The financial capability of the private corporations is also very significant due to the relatively large size of the proposed projects. Obviously, the government wants to retain companies whose balance sheets are proportionate to their responsibilities under the project, including the provision of performance bonds. Once again, this is not a place for start-up companies to hope to make their mark with a huge contract that is disproportionate to their past dealings. Thus, the government, in striving to minimize problems from the outset, wants assurance that all the potential bidders are experienced and have financial capability to carry out the job.

2. RFP - Request for Proposals

An RFP is used to solicit proposals from prequalified bidders in an RFQ process, or if there is no RFQ process, it will also include the requirement to provide a statement of qualifications. The RFP is the key document in the process, and outlines what the government wants the private sector to bid on. Typical contents of an RFP include:

  • A detailed description of the opportunity, couched in commercial, rather than legalistic language, as the opportunity should still be marketed to interested bidders/proponents in order to generate greater interest and thereby enhance project value, and (for two-stage evaluations) in order to ensure continued interest among prospective proponents so that they do in fact proceed to become proponents;
  • A summary disclosure of information related to the opportunity, with references to more detailed sources of information not contained directly within the RFP. The disclosure of information, both within and outside the RFP, is ordinarily more detailed than in an RFQ;
  • The procurement schedule, including submission deadlines;
  • Evaluation criteria and submission requirements in enough detail to provide proponents a reasonable opportunity to prepare a formally and substantively viable and compliant proposal; and
  • Legal disclaimers with respect to the government’s liability for any inaccuracies in information provided to proponents, with respect to government’s right to amend the RFP and with respect to government’s right to reject the proposal of any or all proponents.

There are numerous other considerations that factor into process decisions.

Risk Allocation

Risks are generally allocated (item by item) according to the specific circumstances of each project, taking into account the following important considerations:

  • It should be allocated to the party best able to manage risk, either through insurance or self-insurance, or through financial or operational risk mitigation strategies;
  • It should be clearly allocated prior to the submission of proposals, since vagueness will force proponents to build sizable contingencies into their bid amounts that would not otherwise be incorporated given clear allocation; and
  • It should be drafted by a team with crossfunctional representation. Members of the team should expressly take on the advocacy of the various project stakeholders - one government, another the private partner, and another the private partner’s lenders (if applicable). Other stakeholders, such as affected local governments or affected labour groups, where of sufficient importance to the project, may also have an advocate, but even if not, should be taken into account.

Changes to Consortia Membership and to Contractors and Sub-contractors

Government might require restrictions to ensure that capability requirements are not by-passed through making changes to consortia membership after the capability of the original membership has been assessed to be satisfactory. For example, restrictions may be imposed on changes to individual people within project organizations holding certain key positions. This helps ensure that highly qualified personnel put forward initially in order to attract selection are not later substituted with less qualified personnel that the government would deem unsatisfactory.

Confidentiality of Information

Confidentiality of information in the procurement process deals with who is to keep what confidential from whom, and in what manner. While there are important reasons to maintain the confidentiality of certain information related to public policy and the protection of proprietary information and intellectual property, these reasons must be counter-balanced against the reasons for disclosing material information related to the infrastructure being procured.

In order to keep information that it receives from proponents confidential from the public at large, the Government Team may find it necessary to destroy or return that information at the conclusion of the procurement process so that it cannot at some later date be required to be made available by the government.

Disclosure of Information

Disclosure of information related to the infrastructure being procured, prior to submission of statements of qualifications and proposals, has a bearing on fairness in the procurement process and on project value. However, it must be weighed against competing requirements for confidentiality:

  • Fairness in the procurement process, both as between government and proponents, and as between proponents themselves, is served by timely disclosure of identical information to all proponents. By disclosing as much information material to the proposed project as possible, information disparities cannot be exploited either by government or by proponents who may have special access to information (perhaps through extensive experience in the region). Moreover, failure to disclose material information may open government to legal liability; and
  • Project value can be enhanced by detailed disclosure of information, as such disclosure of the structure of the deal renders more definite the assignment of risk and responsibility between government and the private partner, and helps to better quantify the exposure and cost that the allocated risk and responsibility bring. Contingencies incorporated into bid amounts, due to unclear allocation of risk and responsibility and due to sub-optimal information for the quantification of exposure and cost, can be reduced through increased disclosure.

The Procurement Process

Two key objectives which can be influenced by the method by which the legal agreements are integrated into the procurement process are value (in particular, the maximization of bid amounts), and fairness (in particular, the establishment of a level playing field across proponents). Value and fairness are achieved by issuing all relevant information to all prospective proponents (at the RFQ stage) and to all proponents (at the RFP stage) in a timely manner, and in a way that does not discriminate between proponents.

Selection of proponents is usually the first step in what could potentially be a very difficult process. If the government first selects a winner in the process, and then attempts to negotiate the legal agreements, the government has lost its advantage and must work at negotiation in order to ensure that the winner agrees to comply with important legal conditions and requirements. At this point, all other bidders are long gone, and the process has surely been prolonged. The key to attaching all the documents at this early stage is that there is little room for future negotiation. The most that the government may choose to offer in terms of compromise is to put out a draft, invite comments from the proponents, reissue a revised draft incorporating such comments as the government decides in its discretion should form part of the document, and then reissue the document as amended. Once a proponent bids, it is bound to sign those amended forms of agreement.

Economic Benefits Requirements

Economic benefits requirements, motivated by an intention to promote economic development, are often sought to be, and often are, incorporated into the Request for Qualifications (if any) and Request for Proposals for a project.

Economic benefits requirements may include: local employment requirements and employee training requirements; local procurement requirements and supplier development requirements; local management requirements, such as the maintenance of local design and construction management offices and of local operations management offices; domestic ownership requirements; technology transfer requirements, in order to develop export capability; and requirements not directly related to the project, as for example, funding of capital or social projects not related to the subject of the project.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions