Municipal Liability Case Alert - Bondy v. London (City), 2013 ONSC 1218

BL
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Contributor

BLG is a leading, national, full-service Canadian law firm focusing on business law, commercial litigation, and intellectual property solutions for our clients. BLG is one of the country’s largest law firms with more than 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals in five cities across Canada.
In Bondy v. London (City), the Court considered whether the City of London and/or a homeowner were liable for a slip and fall accident that occurred on the paved portion of a municipal boulevard that formed part of a residential driveway running from the municipal sidewalk to the roadway.
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Bondy v. London (City), the Court considered whether the City of London and/or a homeowner were liable for a slip and fall accident that occurred on the paved portion of a municipal boulevard that formed part of a residential driveway running from the municipal sidewalk to the roadway. The accident occurred shortly after a heavy freezing rain storm, which closed area schools and led to radio announcements advising citizens to stay off the roads and sidewalks. The City had deployed roadway snow removal / salting personnel earlier that morning but acknowledged that it "never applied salt or sand to any of the City's boulevards."

In all the circumstances, the Court concluded that neither the City nor the homeowner were liable to the plaintiff. With respect to the City, the Court found that the City had met the minimum maintenance standards for icy roadways, despite noting that "whether the plow operators would have salted the boulevard portion of [the roadway], is unknown." The decision suggests that a municipality may not need to specifically address the portion of a "private" driveway located within the municipal road allowance. At the same time, the Court's judgment appears to have been heavily influenced by the fact that the weather was so treacherous as to require the broadcast of public warnings, yet the plaintiff chose to travel in any event.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More