Canada: Information On Fair Dealing

Last Updated: April 3 2013
Article by Samantha C. Kernahan

Fair dealing, as an exception to copyright infringement, is a user right. It stands in opposition to several exclusive rights granted to owners of copyright by Canada's CopyrightAct.1However, fair dealing is not an absolute concept. It must be interpreted in accordance with an analytical framework provided at law.

The information provided in this article is intended to assist educators applying the concept of fair dealing so as to avoid claims of copyright infringement. Attached to this document is a "quick reference" chart containing some key points on the scope of fair dealing.

A. Fair Dealing: Common Law Basis

On July 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada released five rulings applicable to copyright. Two of these decisions, Alberta (Education) v.Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (AccessCopyright)2and Society of Composers, Authorsand Music Publishers of Canada v. BellCanada,3were on the subject of fair dealing.

However, neither the Access Copyright decision nor the Bell Music decision can be understood without reference to the Supreme Court of Canada's seminal decision in CCH Canadian Ltd.v. Law Society of Upper Canada. 4

Facts in CCH

The Law Society of Upper Canada operates the Great Library at Toronto's Osgoode Hall Law School. As a service to its patrons, the Great Library offers photocopying of legal materials by self-service copiers as well as copying on request followed by delivery of the copied materials to patrons by courier, mail, or fax.

CCH claimed that the services offered by the Great Library amounted to copyright  infringement of the legal materials published by CCH. The Supreme Court of Canada was required to decide whether Great Library's dealings with the published works were "fair dealings" within the scope of s. 29, the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement provided by the Copyright Act.5

Legal Analysis in CCH

A unanimous Supreme Court of Canada held that the services offered by the Great Library fell within the doctrine of fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study. As such, the copying did not amount to copyright infringement.

Importantly, the court found that s. 29 and the other exceptions in the Act are users' rights that "must not be interpreted restrictively."6 Instead, they should be given a "large and liberal interpretation in order to ensure that users' rights are not unduly constrained."7On the facts at hand, the term " research" was defined broadly so as not to be limited to non-commercial or private contexts.

The court established an analytical framework to assess whether copying of works subject to copyright protection amounts to fair dealing. The analysis is made up of two parts:

1. It is necessary for the purpose of the dealing to be for research or private study.

2. It is necessary for the dealing to be fair.

The court provided six "fairness factors" for the second part of the analysis. Each of these factors must be applied and assessed in light of the facts of a particular instance of copying:

(a) Purpose of the dealing

The question regarding purpose of the dealing under Step 2 is not the same question as the one under Step 1. At this point, it is necessary to examine the motivation of the copier to determine whether such person may have a separate motive from the user. A separate motive, such as commercial profit, may be more or less fair.8

(b) Amount of the dealing

This question examines the overall proportion of reproduction to the entire work— the higher the percentage of reproduction, the more likely that the dealing is unfair.9

(c) Character of the dealing

This factor seeks to quantify the total number of copies made. It is a cumulative assessment of aggregate number of copies made over a time span. The more copies made over a length of time (as opposed to a small number of copies made for a particular and limited circumstance), the more likely that the dealing is unfair.10

(d) Nature of the work at issue

This question examines whether the work at issue is unpublished, whether it was intended to be confidential or some other condition of the work itself that would suggest fairness if dealt with by a person other than the copyright owner.11

(e) Alternatives to the dealing

Is there an equivalent work that is not protected by copyright? Is the dealing reasonably necessary to achieve the ultimate purpose, for instance, research or private study? Could such activities nevertheless take place in a meaningful way without the dealing?12

(f) Effect of the dealing on the work

If the reproduced work is likely to compete with the market of the original work, this may suggest that the dealing is unfair. However, this factor is neither the only one or the most important one to be assessed in the fairness analysis.13

Where each of the fairness factors are satisfied on the facts of a particular matter and the underlying purpose of the copying is for an allowable purpose, the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement is likely to apply.

Facts in Access Copyright

The Supreme Court of Canada's recent majority decision in Access Copyright deals with the doctrine of fair dealing as it applies to copying of learning materials for kindergarten to grade 12 students. The key question before the court was whether copies made at a teacher's initiative with instructions to students that they read the materials fell within the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement. The facts under examination were that teachers would photocopy short textbook excerpts and distribute those copies to students as a complement to the main textbook the students used.

Legal Analysis in Access Copyright

There was no debate on the facts that the copies were made for the allowable purpose of research or private study under the first part of the analytical framework.

The majority of the court (five of the nine judges) then applied all six of the fairness factors under the second part of the analytical framework to find that the teachers' dealings were fair.

Importantly, the majority of the court found that a teacher does not have a separate or ulterior purpose when making copies of readings. A teacher's purpose to make such copies is coexistent with students' purposes to do research or private study. Moreover, " instruction and research/private study are, in the school context, tautological."14

The majority's specific reference to the " school context" is pivotal when considering the impact of their decision. A fair purpose on the part of the teacher was found under the second part of the analytical framework due, in large part, to the kindergarten–grade 12 educational model. In other words, it was relied on by the majority of the court that kindergarten– grade 12 students do not purchase course packs or pay fees directly associated with copied materials. Had there been circumstances suggesting a fee-based dimension to the teacher's copying, the teacher's purpose under the second part of the fair dealing analysis would not likely have aligned with that of the students.

Upon application of the five remaining fairness factors, the majority of the court concluded that the teachers' dealings with the materials subject to copyright protection were fair.

Facts in Bell Music

In the Bell Music decision, the court closely examined the nature of the song previews when it determined that the reproductions at issue were fair.

On the facts, the court found that the song previews were temporary digital files that could not be further duplicated or disseminated. 15The song previews were simply short excerpts of the entire song actually for sale and were often of lesser quality than the song for sale.16The court also found that there is no alternative to the dealing on the facts of the matter, given the unique opportunity for a user to assess what a musical work sounds like prior to making an online purchase.17The nature of the copyright-protected musical work did not suggest that its dealing would result in unfair consequences. In fact, without an opportunity to locate and identify a musical work worthy of purchase, such works may not be disseminated at all.18Finally, the effect of the dealing on the copyright-protected musical works tended towards  increased sales and dissemination.19

Legal Analysis in Bell Music

The court simply applied the fair dealing analytical framework to the facts at issue. In the result, the purpose of the song previews was for the research or private study of those who downloaded the previews. Upon application of the six fairness factors, the song previews were found to be fair and therefore did not constitute copyright infringement.

B. Fair Dealing: Statutory Basis

Canada's Copyright Act

Bill C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act,20effected many changes to Canada's CopyrightAct. The Copyright Modernization Act receivedroyal assent on June 29, 2012, and the majorityof its provisions were proclaimed in force on November 7, 2012. Importantly, s. 29 has been amended to provide the following:

Fair Dealing

Research, private study, etc.

29. Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright [emphasis added].21

Moreover, the amended fair dealing provision of the Copyright Modernization Act codifies the term "education" as an allowable fair dealing purpose. While the Supreme Court of Canada's majority decision in Access Copyright did not rely on the text of Bill C-11 when coming to its conclusion on the teachers' and students' coexistent purposes, the legislative changes further support the shift towards user rights in the educational context.

The concept of "education" within fair dealing has been so far understood in accordance with traditional models of educational delivery. The recent Access Copyright decision endorsed the singularity of purpose amongst teachers and students when kindergarten–grade 12 students are engaged in classroom-based learning. Post-secondary educational delivery shares many features with the kindergarten–grade 12 model and is considered to fall within the allowable fair dealing purpose of "education." However, it is possible that models outside of our current understanding of educational delivery may in future qualify as circumstances in which fair dealing can occur.

C. Statutory Damages for Copyright Infringement

In general, the quantum of damages upon a finding of copyright infringement may include an award from the court as well as an accounting of profits derived from the infringing activity. However, under the former CopyrightAct, an aggrieved copyright owner may have also had elected to receive statutory damages between $500 and $20,000 without requiring an accounting of profits.22 The court was required to consider all of the surrounding circumstances when deciding on a statutory damages award that was just.

However, due to the amendments effected by the Copyright Modernization Act, current statutory damages provisions allow for a distinction between commercial and non commercial purposes underlying copyright infringement. In brief, an aggrieved copyright owner may still seek an award of damages as well as an accounting of profits. However, where the copyright infringement is for non-commercial purposes, a court may grant damages up to $5,000 for such infringement.23

The award of damages is a fact-specific analysis that depends on the unique circumstances of each matter.

D. Fair Dealing and Copyright Licences

A licence is a form of permission granted by a rights-holder ("licensor") to enable an indentified person ("licensee") to use the rights at issue.

A licensee does not acquire any rights of use beyond those that are stated in the licence.

A licence is a form of agreement between parties that may be enforced under civil law. A copyright licence is a common form of agreement that permits a licensee to use materials subject to copyright protection without engaging in what would otherwise constitute copyright infringement.

Fees or royalties to use the materials subject to copyright protection are commonly levied by the licensor.

A copyright licence stands apart from the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement provided by the Copyright Act. That is, a person may be a licensee under a copyright licence but that person does not necessarily forfeit his/her fair dealing rights provided by statute. Much depends on the particular wording of the licence (assuming validity of the licence) and all of the applicable circumstances.

As a general principle, a person would not seek a licence to use material protected by copyright if that person was able use the material under the fair dealing exception provided by the Copyright Act.

It is clear, however, that permissible use under the fair dealing exception must fall within the limits of the analytical framework as provided by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH. If use of material subject to copyright protection is not for an allowable purpose and does not align with the six fairness factors, a copyright licence may permit use that would otherwise amount to infringement.

The particular circumstances of each matter would need to be examined to determine whether non-infringing use of copyright may be made under fair dealing or only by permission expressed as a licence.

Quick Reference on Fair Dealing

Key Points for Consideration

Legal Commentary

Historically, K–12 teachers' copying of materials subject to copyright protection for in-class handouts was not considered to fall within allowable fair dealing purposes of research or private study.

The Access Copyright decision found that K 12 teachers have a symbiotic purpose with their students when making class handouts. Teachers' purposes are coexistent with students' research or private study in the K 12 context.

In the post-secondary educational context, required readings are often associated with fee-based course packs. Because fair dealing in part depends on there being no commercial motive on the part of the copier, required readings have consistently been considered to fall outside of the ambit of fair dealing.

The Access Copyright decision endorsed the distinction between copying with no motive of commercial gain (one key fairness factor) and copying where an ulterior motive such as profit takes the copying outside of allowable purposes of research or private study. This analysis applies regardless of whether the copying is for required or supplementary readings.

Copying of materials for course packs and library reserve may constitute fair dealing.

The result depends on the application of the CCH analytical framework and all of the surrounding circumstances.

Two of the fairness factors include the proportion of the copying to the overall work (the "amount of the dealing") as well as the aggregate amount of the copying (the  "character of the dealing").

Persons engaged in copying of materials subject to copyright protection need to be keenly aware of these two fairness factors. Adherence to copying percentages offered by  the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada ("AUCC") Fair Dealing Guidelines is the best guideline available at present.

Fair dealing applies to works subject to copyright protection but one factor in the fairness of the dealing is the nature of the underlying work.

If a work has not yet been published, dealing with it may not be fair.

Fair dealing requires the copier to take reasonable steps to control the dissemination of works so dealt with.

Destruction of copies or digital files after use may be required to satisfy the fair dealing analysis

Historically, different rules applied to paper copies over digital copies in the context of copyright infringement.

The Copyright Modernization Act seeks to achieve technological neutrality in the context of copyright protection and infringement. The full impact of the changes has yet to be understood.


1 R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 [Act].

2 [2012] S.C.J. No. 37 [Access Copyright].

3 [2012] S.C.J. No. 36 [Bell Music].

4 [2004] S.C.J. No. 12 [CCH].

5 Supra note 1. Section 29 of Canada's recently

amended Copyright Act provided:

Fair Dealing

Research or private study

29. Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study

does not infringe copyright.

6 CCH, supra note 4 at para. 48.

7 Ibid. at para. 51.

8 Ibid. at para. 54.

9 Ibid. at para. 56.

10 Ibid. at para. 55.

11 Ibid. at para. 58.

12 Ibid. at para. 57.

13 Ibid. at para. 59.

14 Access Copyright, supra note 2 at para. 23.

15 Bell Music, supra note 3 at para. 4.

16 Ibid. at para. 35.

17 Ibid. at para. 46.

18 Ibid. at para. 47.

19 Ibid. at para. 48.

20 SI/2012-85.

21 Supra note 1, s. 29.

22 Ibid., s. 38.1.

23 Bill C-11, s. 46(1).

Previously published in Risk Management in Canadian Education, February 2013, Volume 13, No. 3

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Samantha C. Kernahan
Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Edmonton, Canada

Alberta is going through a difficult economic period. These times can be challenging and while owners struggle to get their business through the rough patch, they want to preserve the assets and capital they have built up.

2 Nov 2016, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

“Problem Employees” come in a variety of forms but seem to take up the majority of an employer’s time. Each form brings its own challenges and each must be addressed in a different way.

30 Nov 2016, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

Legal issues surrounding contaminated sites affects landowners, developers, realtors, as well as consultants and contractors working on the front lines. This webinar will provide a practical review of how the legislation is actually being used, recent court decisions, challenges with brownfield developments, and future changes.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.