Canada: Information On Fair Dealing

Last Updated: April 3 2013
Article by Samantha C. Kernahan

Fair dealing, as an exception to copyright infringement, is a user right. It stands in opposition to several exclusive rights granted to owners of copyright by Canada's CopyrightAct.1However, fair dealing is not an absolute concept. It must be interpreted in accordance with an analytical framework provided at law.

The information provided in this article is intended to assist educators applying the concept of fair dealing so as to avoid claims of copyright infringement. Attached to this document is a "quick reference" chart containing some key points on the scope of fair dealing.

A. Fair Dealing: Common Law Basis

On July 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada released five rulings applicable to copyright. Two of these decisions, Alberta (Education) v.Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (AccessCopyright)2and Society of Composers, Authorsand Music Publishers of Canada v. BellCanada,3were on the subject of fair dealing.

However, neither the Access Copyright decision nor the Bell Music decision can be understood without reference to the Supreme Court of Canada's seminal decision in CCH Canadian Ltd.v. Law Society of Upper Canada. 4

Facts in CCH

The Law Society of Upper Canada operates the Great Library at Toronto's Osgoode Hall Law School. As a service to its patrons, the Great Library offers photocopying of legal materials by self-service copiers as well as copying on request followed by delivery of the copied materials to patrons by courier, mail, or fax.

CCH claimed that the services offered by the Great Library amounted to copyright  infringement of the legal materials published by CCH. The Supreme Court of Canada was required to decide whether Great Library's dealings with the published works were "fair dealings" within the scope of s. 29, the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement provided by the Copyright Act.5

Legal Analysis in CCH

A unanimous Supreme Court of Canada held that the services offered by the Great Library fell within the doctrine of fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study. As such, the copying did not amount to copyright infringement.

Importantly, the court found that s. 29 and the other exceptions in the Act are users' rights that "must not be interpreted restrictively."6 Instead, they should be given a "large and liberal interpretation in order to ensure that users' rights are not unduly constrained."7On the facts at hand, the term " research" was defined broadly so as not to be limited to non-commercial or private contexts.

The court established an analytical framework to assess whether copying of works subject to copyright protection amounts to fair dealing. The analysis is made up of two parts:

1. It is necessary for the purpose of the dealing to be for research or private study.

2. It is necessary for the dealing to be fair.

The court provided six "fairness factors" for the second part of the analysis. Each of these factors must be applied and assessed in light of the facts of a particular instance of copying:

(a) Purpose of the dealing

The question regarding purpose of the dealing under Step 2 is not the same question as the one under Step 1. At this point, it is necessary to examine the motivation of the copier to determine whether such person may have a separate motive from the user. A separate motive, such as commercial profit, may be more or less fair.8

(b) Amount of the dealing

This question examines the overall proportion of reproduction to the entire work— the higher the percentage of reproduction, the more likely that the dealing is unfair.9

(c) Character of the dealing

This factor seeks to quantify the total number of copies made. It is a cumulative assessment of aggregate number of copies made over a time span. The more copies made over a length of time (as opposed to a small number of copies made for a particular and limited circumstance), the more likely that the dealing is unfair.10

(d) Nature of the work at issue

This question examines whether the work at issue is unpublished, whether it was intended to be confidential or some other condition of the work itself that would suggest fairness if dealt with by a person other than the copyright owner.11

(e) Alternatives to the dealing

Is there an equivalent work that is not protected by copyright? Is the dealing reasonably necessary to achieve the ultimate purpose, for instance, research or private study? Could such activities nevertheless take place in a meaningful way without the dealing?12

(f) Effect of the dealing on the work

If the reproduced work is likely to compete with the market of the original work, this may suggest that the dealing is unfair. However, this factor is neither the only one or the most important one to be assessed in the fairness analysis.13

Where each of the fairness factors are satisfied on the facts of a particular matter and the underlying purpose of the copying is for an allowable purpose, the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement is likely to apply.

Facts in Access Copyright

The Supreme Court of Canada's recent majority decision in Access Copyright deals with the doctrine of fair dealing as it applies to copying of learning materials for kindergarten to grade 12 students. The key question before the court was whether copies made at a teacher's initiative with instructions to students that they read the materials fell within the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement. The facts under examination were that teachers would photocopy short textbook excerpts and distribute those copies to students as a complement to the main textbook the students used.

Legal Analysis in Access Copyright

There was no debate on the facts that the copies were made for the allowable purpose of research or private study under the first part of the analytical framework.

The majority of the court (five of the nine judges) then applied all six of the fairness factors under the second part of the analytical framework to find that the teachers' dealings were fair.

Importantly, the majority of the court found that a teacher does not have a separate or ulterior purpose when making copies of readings. A teacher's purpose to make such copies is coexistent with students' purposes to do research or private study. Moreover, " instruction and research/private study are, in the school context, tautological."14

The majority's specific reference to the " school context" is pivotal when considering the impact of their decision. A fair purpose on the part of the teacher was found under the second part of the analytical framework due, in large part, to the kindergarten–grade 12 educational model. In other words, it was relied on by the majority of the court that kindergarten– grade 12 students do not purchase course packs or pay fees directly associated with copied materials. Had there been circumstances suggesting a fee-based dimension to the teacher's copying, the teacher's purpose under the second part of the fair dealing analysis would not likely have aligned with that of the students.

Upon application of the five remaining fairness factors, the majority of the court concluded that the teachers' dealings with the materials subject to copyright protection were fair.

Facts in Bell Music

In the Bell Music decision, the court closely examined the nature of the song previews when it determined that the reproductions at issue were fair.

On the facts, the court found that the song previews were temporary digital files that could not be further duplicated or disseminated. 15The song previews were simply short excerpts of the entire song actually for sale and were often of lesser quality than the song for sale.16The court also found that there is no alternative to the dealing on the facts of the matter, given the unique opportunity for a user to assess what a musical work sounds like prior to making an online purchase.17The nature of the copyright-protected musical work did not suggest that its dealing would result in unfair consequences. In fact, without an opportunity to locate and identify a musical work worthy of purchase, such works may not be disseminated at all.18Finally, the effect of the dealing on the copyright-protected musical works tended towards  increased sales and dissemination.19

Legal Analysis in Bell Music

The court simply applied the fair dealing analytical framework to the facts at issue. In the result, the purpose of the song previews was for the research or private study of those who downloaded the previews. Upon application of the six fairness factors, the song previews were found to be fair and therefore did not constitute copyright infringement.

B. Fair Dealing: Statutory Basis

Canada's Copyright Act

Bill C-11, the Copyright Modernization Act,20effected many changes to Canada's CopyrightAct. The Copyright Modernization Act receivedroyal assent on June 29, 2012, and the majorityof its provisions were proclaimed in force on November 7, 2012. Importantly, s. 29 has been amended to provide the following:

Fair Dealing

Research, private study, etc.

29. Fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright [emphasis added].21

Moreover, the amended fair dealing provision of the Copyright Modernization Act codifies the term "education" as an allowable fair dealing purpose. While the Supreme Court of Canada's majority decision in Access Copyright did not rely on the text of Bill C-11 when coming to its conclusion on the teachers' and students' coexistent purposes, the legislative changes further support the shift towards user rights in the educational context.

The concept of "education" within fair dealing has been so far understood in accordance with traditional models of educational delivery. The recent Access Copyright decision endorsed the singularity of purpose amongst teachers and students when kindergarten–grade 12 students are engaged in classroom-based learning. Post-secondary educational delivery shares many features with the kindergarten–grade 12 model and is considered to fall within the allowable fair dealing purpose of "education." However, it is possible that models outside of our current understanding of educational delivery may in future qualify as circumstances in which fair dealing can occur.

C. Statutory Damages for Copyright Infringement

In general, the quantum of damages upon a finding of copyright infringement may include an award from the court as well as an accounting of profits derived from the infringing activity. However, under the former CopyrightAct, an aggrieved copyright owner may have also had elected to receive statutory damages between $500 and $20,000 without requiring an accounting of profits.22 The court was required to consider all of the surrounding circumstances when deciding on a statutory damages award that was just.

However, due to the amendments effected by the Copyright Modernization Act, current statutory damages provisions allow for a distinction between commercial and non commercial purposes underlying copyright infringement. In brief, an aggrieved copyright owner may still seek an award of damages as well as an accounting of profits. However, where the copyright infringement is for non-commercial purposes, a court may grant damages up to $5,000 for such infringement.23

The award of damages is a fact-specific analysis that depends on the unique circumstances of each matter.

D. Fair Dealing and Copyright Licences

A licence is a form of permission granted by a rights-holder ("licensor") to enable an indentified person ("licensee") to use the rights at issue.

A licensee does not acquire any rights of use beyond those that are stated in the licence.

A licence is a form of agreement between parties that may be enforced under civil law. A copyright licence is a common form of agreement that permits a licensee to use materials subject to copyright protection without engaging in what would otherwise constitute copyright infringement.

Fees or royalties to use the materials subject to copyright protection are commonly levied by the licensor.

A copyright licence stands apart from the fair dealing exception to copyright infringement provided by the Copyright Act. That is, a person may be a licensee under a copyright licence but that person does not necessarily forfeit his/her fair dealing rights provided by statute. Much depends on the particular wording of the licence (assuming validity of the licence) and all of the applicable circumstances.

As a general principle, a person would not seek a licence to use material protected by copyright if that person was able use the material under the fair dealing exception provided by the Copyright Act.

It is clear, however, that permissible use under the fair dealing exception must fall within the limits of the analytical framework as provided by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH. If use of material subject to copyright protection is not for an allowable purpose and does not align with the six fairness factors, a copyright licence may permit use that would otherwise amount to infringement.

The particular circumstances of each matter would need to be examined to determine whether non-infringing use of copyright may be made under fair dealing or only by permission expressed as a licence.

Quick Reference on Fair Dealing

Key Points for Consideration

Legal Commentary

Historically, K–12 teachers' copying of materials subject to copyright protection for in-class handouts was not considered to fall within allowable fair dealing purposes of research or private study.

The Access Copyright decision found that K 12 teachers have a symbiotic purpose with their students when making class handouts. Teachers' purposes are coexistent with students' research or private study in the K 12 context.

In the post-secondary educational context, required readings are often associated with fee-based course packs. Because fair dealing in part depends on there being no commercial motive on the part of the copier, required readings have consistently been considered to fall outside of the ambit of fair dealing.

The Access Copyright decision endorsed the distinction between copying with no motive of commercial gain (one key fairness factor) and copying where an ulterior motive such as profit takes the copying outside of allowable purposes of research or private study. This analysis applies regardless of whether the copying is for required or supplementary readings.

Copying of materials for course packs and library reserve may constitute fair dealing.

The result depends on the application of the CCH analytical framework and all of the surrounding circumstances.

Two of the fairness factors include the proportion of the copying to the overall work (the "amount of the dealing") as well as the aggregate amount of the copying (the  "character of the dealing").

Persons engaged in copying of materials subject to copyright protection need to be keenly aware of these two fairness factors. Adherence to copying percentages offered by  the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada ("AUCC") Fair Dealing Guidelines is the best guideline available at present.

Fair dealing applies to works subject to copyright protection but one factor in the fairness of the dealing is the nature of the underlying work.

If a work has not yet been published, dealing with it may not be fair.

Fair dealing requires the copier to take reasonable steps to control the dissemination of works so dealt with.

Destruction of copies or digital files after use may be required to satisfy the fair dealing analysis

Historically, different rules applied to paper copies over digital copies in the context of copyright infringement.

The Copyright Modernization Act seeks to achieve technological neutrality in the context of copyright protection and infringement. The full impact of the changes has yet to be understood.

Footnotes

1 R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 [Act].

2 [2012] S.C.J. No. 37 [Access Copyright].

3 [2012] S.C.J. No. 36 [Bell Music].

4 [2004] S.C.J. No. 12 [CCH].

5 Supra note 1. Section 29 of Canada's recently

amended Copyright Act provided:

Fair Dealing

Research or private study

29. Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study

does not infringe copyright.

6 CCH, supra note 4 at para. 48.

7 Ibid. at para. 51.

8 Ibid. at para. 54.

9 Ibid. at para. 56.

10 Ibid. at para. 55.

11 Ibid. at para. 58.

12 Ibid. at para. 57.

13 Ibid. at para. 59.

14 Access Copyright, supra note 2 at para. 23.

15 Bell Music, supra note 3 at para. 4.

16 Ibid. at para. 35.

17 Ibid. at para. 46.

18 Ibid. at para. 47.

19 Ibid. at para. 48.

20 SI/2012-85.

21 Supra note 1, s. 29.

22 Ibid., s. 38.1.

23 Bill C-11, s. 46(1).

Previously published in Risk Management in Canadian Education, February 2013, Volume 13, No. 3

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Samantha C. Kernahan
Events from this Firm
19 Dec 2017, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

McLennan Ross previously conducted a webinar on June 6, 2017 about the passage of Bill 17, during which we reviewed the changes to the Employment Standards Code and the Labour Relations Code. During that webinar, we identified a number of issues which would depend upon the language of the Regulations, which had not yet been developed.

24 Oct 2018, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

A written employment agreement is an often ignored best practice for non-union employers. A written agreement can be a critical risk management tool if it properly sets out duties, rights and expectations both during the employment relationship and after it ends.

5 Nov 2018, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

Who Should Attend: This webinar is intended for superintendents of schools, central office personnel, HR personnel, in house counsel and school board trustees.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Gowling WLG
Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
Gowling WLG
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Gowling WLG
Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
Gowling WLG
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions