The recent publication in the South Africa Law Journal ("SALJ") of Gary JA Moore & Jerome Veldsman's article entitled Big Brother and the holding company: Ministerial Consent to Dispose of Indirect controlling interests in mining companies, may have some serious consequences.

The article analyses section 11 of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 ("MPRDA"), which deals with the requirement of consent for transfers of mining and prospecting rights and interests in them. As the title indicates, the article's focus is on whether ministerial consent is required for a disposal of an indirect controlling interest in a company that holds a mining right or a prospecting right ("right").

The authors say that the MPRDA is not clear on whether section 11(1) is applicable to the disposal of indirect controlling interests in companies which hold rights. The authors maintain, however, that Ministerial consent under section 11(1) is indeed applicable to companies holding rights both directly or indirectly. This restricts the disposal of controlling interests in companies which do not themselves hold a right, where such company is a holding (parent) company of the company which holds a right or in the same group of companies as a company which holds a right.

In our view, this is a very broad interpretation of a legislative provision which itself imposes strict limitations on the right of commercial entities to dispose of their assets and which, for that reason, should probably be interpreted restrictively, rather than broadly. Nevertheless, the views put forward in the article now have some authority and mining companies should take note of its contents.

www.fasken.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.