Canada: Selection Of Remedies In Mining Property Disputes: Tipping The Balance In Your Favour

The recent surge in commodity prices has resulted in an acquisition rush on projects at various stages of development. It should therefore come as no surprise that disputes over ownership of desirable mining projects are finding their way into courts. This article addresses:

  • the two typical remedies available in such disputes – an award of possession of the property or damages for the value of the property;
  • the factors driving courts to order one remedy over the other; and
  • relevant considerations for parties to maximize the likelihood of obtaining the desired remedy.

The Supreme Court of Canada's (SCC) decision in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd. (Lac Minerals) established that where a dispute arises regarding entitlement to a mining asset, the successful plaintiff may be awarded possession of the mine (a proprietary award), instead of simply a monetary award of damages as compensation. Indeed, in the 20 years since Lac Minerals was decided, courts have demonstrated a general preference for proprietary awards where possible, often citing the difficulties in adequately valuing a mining property for the purposes of awarding monetary damages. That said, a proprietary award is never guaranteed and should not be expected as a matter of course. Rather, Canadian courts have repeatedly noted their willingness to undertake the exercise of quantifying an appropriate monetary award, difficult though that task may be.1 Parties to litigation are well advised to give careful consideration to the evidence they choose to lead on the question of the value of the property because the choices they make may inadvertently drive the court to a remedy that the party is seeking to avoid.

In most cases, both parties to litigation will be advocating for an end result that finds them in possession of the asset. The plaintiff often approaches litigation from a "have not" position and will be asking the court for a proprietary award that provides it with ownership of the asset.

Conversely, the defendant often enters litigation in possession of the asset and will want that status quo of ownership maintained. Thus, even in the event that it is found liable to the plaintiff, the defendant will want the court to award monetary damages in lieu of a proprietary award. The parties must always have regard to their desired outcome in assessing the focus of their evidence.

Considerations for a Plaintiff

Counterintuitive though it may be, the fact that a plaintiff ultimately desires a proprietary award does not relieve it of leading evidence directed at establishing the monetary value of the target asset. This is because one of the key factors that will lead a court to award a proprietary remedy is a conclusion that a monetary award would be so uncertain that there is a real risk of under-compensating the plaintiff. Accordingly, a court will be more likely to award a proprietary remedy if there is conflicting evidence so as to produce material uncertainty as to quantification. One can be sure that the defendant (who will be advocating that monetary damages are appropriate) will lead evidence to show that damages are quantifiable with an appropriate degree of certainty. In the absence of countervailing evidence from the plaintiff establishing a wildly different valuation, the court may be inclined to accept the defendant's argument that damages are quantifiable and therefore the appropriate remedy.

Bearing in mind that the end goal is often getting a proprietary award, the plaintiff must give careful consideration to the type of evidence that it will lead as to the quantification of damages. Examination of this point requires a brief digression as to the method by which the court quantifies the value of mining assets.

Although there are numerous accepted approaches to the valuation of mining properties,2 courts have tended to favour a valuation based on the net present value of the anticipated earnings over the life of the project. The determination of a project's net present value will be dependent on a number of interrelated variables, including among others: long term metals pricing, capital costs, operating costs, mineral reserves, timeline to production, taxation regimes, future economic considerations (e.g., inflationary trends, future demand for commodity, etc.) and political risk.

The plaintiff is often best served by leading evidence that takes an aggressive but reasonably defensible position in respect of as many variables as possible. For example, it may be desirable to advance a valuation based on highest metals pricing, lowest possible capital and operating expenditures, quickest timetable to production, most favourable tax structure, etc.

This approach serves two important functions. First, it produces a large valuation of the asset, positioning the plaintiff most favourably in the event that the court ultimately prefers a monetary award. Second, and more importantly, it will compel the defendant to lead contradictory evidence as to valuation, ideally (from the plaintiff's perspective) attempting to drive down the quantum by attacking as many of the variables as possible. The plaintiff's real goal is to show that an attempt at valuation will be so uncertain as to likely result in compensation that is unjust to one of the parties. This goal is achieved by having contradictory evidence on a number of variables, such that a multitude of outcomes is possible and no particular outcome can be said to be reasonably certain.

Considerations for a Defendant

Assuming that the plaintiff will be successful at establishing liability, the defendant faces the prospect of either losing its asset or paying out monetary damages. Presuming the latter to be the lesser evil, the defendant must walk a precarious line to ensure that it pays as little money as necessary, all the while protecting its ownership of the asset. Protesting the plaintiff's damages evidence too vigorously may prompt the court to throw up its hands on quantification, favouring instead a proprietary award. However, failure to dispute the plaintiff's evidence may result in a cripplingly large damages award. As with all line walking, the defendant will have to find the right balance for its particular situation.

A defendant would be well advised to compare the plaintiff's damages assessment against its own internal estimate of the net present value. If the two positions are largely congruous, there is a strong strategic advantage to accepting the plaintiff's figures. Doing so will severely hamper the plaintiff's argument for a proprietary remedy, as the parties will have agreed to a damages value that appropriately compensates the plaintiff.

Where the comparison reveals that the plaintiff's assessment is grossly overstated, the defendant may nonetheless want to pick its battles carefully. As set out above, a scorched earth attack on all or even many of the variables advanced by the plaintiff may simply play into the plaintiff's hand: the more uncertainty produced through conflicting evidence on quantification, the greater the chance of the court finding that a proprietary remed is necessary. Rather, the defendant might determine which single variable will produce the greatest swing in total price and focus its evidence on that element of the plaintiff's valuation.

Another approach for a defendant to consider, depending on the stage of development of the project, is to attack the appropriateness of the methodology chosen by the plaintiff and to present a coherent alternate valuation approach or seek to arrive at a valuation through the assessment of a combination of approaches.3 An issue a defendant will almost always face in this scenario is that its valuation will almost inevitably result in the defendant presenting a range of values, and it will then be incumbent on the defendant to convince the court that such a range represents an acceptable level of valuation precision for properties in the mining sector.


Although courts in recent years have shown a tendency towards awarding proprietary awards in disputes over mining properties, this result is by no means a foregone conclusion in any particular piece of litigation. Rather, the determination of appropriate remedy will always be a function of the evidence adduced by the parties. A strategic and thoughtful approach to such evidence is therefore crucial to any party seeking to tip the remedial balance in its favour.

To view original article, please click here.


1. Even in the seminal case of Lac Minerals, two of the SCC's justices indicated that they would have ordered a monetary, rather than proprietary, award.

2. See, for example, CIMVAL Standards and Guidelines for Valuation of Mineral Properties.

3. Alternate approaches could include a cost approach, a comparable transaction approach or a comparable trading multiple approach.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.