Canada: Contractual Notice Requirements: Not Just A "Technical Defence"

Last Updated: March 18 2013
Article by Howard Krupat

The following conversation is not uncommon at the outset of a construction dispute:

Contractor's Lawyer: "My client is clearly owed millions of dollars for unpaid extra work and delay damages.  What is your client's defence?"

Owner's Lawyer:  "Your client failed to comply with the notice requirements prescribed by the contract for advancing a claim.  Your client's claim is clearly out of time and there is no entitlement to payment".

Contractor's Lawyer: "I understand that this is your client's technical defence, but surely you are going to be relying upon more than that.  What is your client's real defence?"

However, as the Ontario Court of Appeal recently ruled in Technicore Underground Inc. v. Toronto (City)1, a failure to comply with clear notice provisions is a real defence.  And in its reasons for judgment, the Court of Appeal essentially reminded us of what the Supreme Court of Canada had articulated thirty years prior.

Brief Summary of the Facts

The City retained Clearway Construction Inc. to build a water main.  Clearway hired Technicore as a subcontractor to do the tunneling work, which required the use of a tunnel boring machine.  On August 2, 2006, a flood occurred in the tunnel.  The tunnel boring machine required repair work and after the resultant delay, the tunneling work was ultimately completed on December 22, 2006.

After completion, the claims commenced.  In a letter dated February 9, 2007, Technicore sought to advance a claim against Clearway for C$800,000.  On March 6, 2007, Clearway delivered a claim to the City for its own alleged flood costs of approximately C$400,000, together with indemnity for the Technicore claim.  The City denied the Clearway claim by letter dated April 4, 2007.

On July 30, 2008, Technicore commenced an action against the City, seeking recovery of its alleged flood damages.  The City added Clearway as a third party.  In March of 2010, or approximately three years after submitting its original claim, Clearway counterclaimed against the City for C$1 million in damages plus indemnity for Technicore's separate claim against Clearway.  Several months later, Clearway sent the City an additional claim for damages of over C$3 million.  Clearway ultimately incorporated its increased damages figure into an amended statement of defence and counterclaim, claiming a total of approximately C$3.4 million.

The provisions in the contract between Clearway and the City included the following:

GC 3.14.03 – Claims Procedure 

.03 The Contractor shall submit detailed claims as soon as reasonably possible and in any event no later than 30 Days after completion of the work affected by the situation.  The detailed claim shall: 

a) identify the item or items in respect of which the claim arises;

b) state the grounds, contractual or otherwise, upon which the claim is made; and

c) include the Records maintained by the Contractor supporting such claim.

The City brought a partial summary judgment motion in reliance upon this notice provision.  The court agreed with the City and the bulk of Clearway's counterclaim was dismissed.  Clearway appealed.

The arguments raised by Clearway were similar to those that are commonly raised in response to a notice defence.  On the facts of this case, the Court of Appeal rejected them all. Although there were five primary grounds raised by Clearway, I have chosen to focus on the three that may have the greatest impact on other cases:

i. The Language of the Notice Provisions

Clearway argued that the contract contained a procedure for identifying claims, but that it did not contain language that was sufficiently clear to deprive Clearway of the right to advance its counterclaim.  In particular, Clearway argued that the contract did not contain a "failing which" clause (i.e. a clause stating that compliance with the notice provision was required failing which the claim could be rejected). 

In reliance upon the Supreme Court of Canada's 1982 decision in Corpex (1977) Inc. v. Canada2, the Court of Appeal rejected this argument outright.  It was noted that the clause at issue in the Corpex case also didn't contain a "failing which" provision and that the Supreme Court of Canada had even commented that both the contractor and owner benefit from a clear notice provision – the contractor has certainty that its legitimate claim will be honoured if it complies with the notice requirements, while the owner has the certainty of knowing whether a claim will be proceeding and can respond appropriately (by mitigating its damages, deciding how to manage any additional work that is actually required, etc.).

Accordingly, the language of the notice provision was sufficient to bar Clearway's claim.

ii. Absence of Prejudice

Another argument put forward by Clearway was that the intention of a notice provision is to prevent prejudice arising from non-compliance.  Clearway argued that with no evidence of prejudice, its claim should not be rejected.

The Court of Appeal again relied upon Corpex.  Although it was recognized that, "one purpose of a notice provision is to enable the owner to consider its position and the financial consequences of the contractor providing additional work" (paragraph 47), it was also held that, "...as owner, the City is assumed to have been prejudiced by a multimillion dollar claim being made years after the Contract permitted and long after the City could consider its position and take steps to protect its financial interests" (paragraph 51).

Clearway's absence of actual prejudice argument was rejected.

iii. Waiver

It is also quite common for a claimant who encounters a notice defence to argue that if the defendant failed to enforce the relevant provisions of the contract throughout the course of the project, then it has waived its right to rely upon them.  In this instance, Clearway argued that since the City failed to object to the timing of the March 2007 claim, it waived compliance with the notice provision at issue.

Once again, the Court of Appeal rejected Clearway's argument outright.  In so doing, it confirmed that a party will only be found to have waived its reliance on its rights where it communicated a clear intention to the other party to do so – "an unequivocal and conscious intention to abandon" (paragraph 64).  The Court of Appeal noted that Clearway did not adduce evidence of any such communications.

Clearway's related argument that the parties varied the terms of their contract by virtue of their conduct failed as well.  To the contrary, the Court of Appeal found that both parties went to great lengths to try to abide by the terms of their agreement.

Conclusion

In reviewing the Technicore decision, one should be careful to take into account the unique facts of the case.  In particular, it was found that the claim at issue had been submitted to the City three years after the applicable deadline had lapsed.  One can only speculate if the outcome would have been the same if the claim had been submitted only one or two weeks late.  In addition, different facts may well have supported a waiver or other argument that could override clear notice provisions.

However, the ruling does send a message that carries a great deal of significance for the construction industry.  In simple terms, parties should always operate under the assumption that they will be held to their bargain.  With respect to defences based upon notice, it is incorrect to dismiss such arguments as "technical" or "last resort" defences that are introduced only where no other position is available. And there is good reason for this – both parties to a contract benefit from certainty and a full understanding of the options available to them when the other party is alleged to be in breach.

In considering how to apply Technicore to their day-to-day businesses, contractors (and all payees) would be well-advised to know their contract terms and abide by them.  If they choose to ignore the prescribed notice provisions, it may potentially be at their own peril, even for otherwise valid claims.  Owners (and all payors), on the other hand, will perhaps have more confidence that when the relevant notice period expires without a claim having been submitted, they can make budgeting and related decisions accordingly.

The most important lesson to be drawn from this decision is one that cannot be stressed enough:  The safest and least controversial course of conduct for parties to a construction contract – be it for a large energy plant or a home renovation – is to review, understand and comply with the terms of their contract.

Footnotes

1 2012 ONCA 597

2 [1982] 2 S.C.R. 643

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions