Canada: Canadian Federal Court Of Appeal Provides Guidance On Merger Challenges

On February 25, 2013, the Federal Court of Appeal ("FCA") released the public version of its decision upholding the Competition Tribunal's order requiring Tervita (formerly known as CCS Corporation) to divest the Babkirk hazardous waste landfill site following its acquisition of Complete Environmental Inc. The case is the first fully contested proceeding under the merger provisions of the Competition Act in over a decade. A summary of the Competition Tribunal's earlier decision is available here.

The FCA considered whether the Tribunal was justified in finding that the merger resulted in a substantial prevention of competition and that the efficiencies claimed by Tervita were not greater than and would not offset the anticompetitive effects of the transaction. Among other things, the decision:

  • endorses the Tribunal's approach to determining whether the merger resulted in a substantial prevention of competition;

  • states that the proper timeframe to consider in determining whether a merger results in a substantial prevention of competition will generally be assessed in relation to the period of time required for a new entrant to enter into the market; and

  • clarifies that the proper methodology for applying the Act's efficiencies defense involves as objective an analysis as is reasonably possible, although this approach may still consider qualitative factors that cannot be quantified.


Tervita, a waste management services company in Western Canada, owned and operated the only two secure landfills for hazardous waste in northeastern British Columbia when it acquired Complete in January 2011. A subsidiary of Complete owned the Babkirk site and a permit from the B.C. Ministry of the Environment to operate a secure landfill at that site, but at the time of the acquisition by Tervita Complete had not begun building a secure landfill at the site.

The Tervita/Complete transaction fell well below the pre-merger notification thresholds in the Act, but was nevertheless challenged by the Commissioner of Competition on the basis that it was likely to result in a substantial prevention of competition in the market for "the disposal of hazardous waste produced largely at oil and gas facilities in northeastern British Columbia". According to the Commissioner, the transaction prevented the entry of a "poised competitor" into the relevant market that would have lowered tipping fees for producers of hazardous waste.

Tervita argued that the merger did not prevent competition because, absent the sale to Tervita, the vendors would have used the Babkirk property for a different service of treating hazardous waste (bioremediation) that would not compete meaningfully with Tervita. As such, Tervita argued that the merger was pro-competitive because it added capacity to the relevant market more quickly than might otherwise occur. Additionally, Tervita asserted that the transaction gave rise to efficiencies that it claimed outweighed any anticompetitive effects of the merger.

The Tribunal found a likely substantial prevention of competition in the relevant market and rejected Tervita's argument that the efficiencies arising from the transaction would outweigh the anticompetitive effects.

The FCA's Decision

1) Prevention of Competition Analysis

In addressing the proper standard of review of the Tribunal's decision, the FCA noted that, in the context of merger analysis, the Tribunal is required to project into the future various events in order to ascertain their potential economic and commercial impacts. It added that this is "a daunting exercise steeped in economic theory and requiring a deep understanding of the economic and commercial factors at issue". As a result, the FCA found that it should defer to the Tribunal's findings on economic and commercial issues, including the inferences it draws from such evidence, provided that the conclusion is not unreasonable.

The FCA concluded that the Tribunal's finding satisfied this test since there was "abundant evidence submitted to the Tribunal" showing that the Babkirk landfill would have competed with Tervita's other secure landfills in northeastern British Columbia, whether operated by the vendors themselves or through sale to a third party operator.

2) Timeframe for Assessing Prevention of Competition

In assessing whether there is a substantial prevention of competition (as opposed a substantial lessening of competition, which is more commonly the basis for the Commissioner to challenge a merger), the Tribunal held that, among other things, it must determine whether the alleged new entry or increased competition to be prevented would likely occur within a "reasonable period of time".

The FCA accepted the Tribunal's approach and provided some guidance on how to assess what constitutes a "reasonable period of time":

  • The timeframe must be discernible. However, this need not be a precisely calibrated determination.

  • Generally speaking, the timeframe for market entry should be a shorter period of time than that required for a new entrant to enter into the market.

In the present case, the Tribunal found that had the merger not occurred, Complete or a third party purchaser would have begun to operate a full service secure landfill in competition with Tervita within 27 months. As this competition was likely to occur within the minimum 30-month period that the Tribunal found that it would take for a new entrant to enter the market, the prevented entry was considered likely to have occurred within a reasonable period of time in the absence of the challenged merger.

The FCA's approach places considerable emphasis on determining (with some precision) the time required to enter the market in prevention cases. However, it is unclear how far distant in the future the Tribunal may be prepared to make a finding of likely entry to support a prevention of competition case.

3) Methodology for Assessing Efficiencies

Where a merger otherwise results in a substantial prevention or lessening of competition, the Act provides that the Tribunal may not make an order where the gains in efficiency resulting from the merger are likely to be greater than and offset its anticompetitive effects.

The FCA clarified that when assessing whether efficiency gains are greater than and offset the anticompetitive effects of a merger, the analysis must be as objective as is reasonably possible, and where an objective determination cannot be made, it must be reasonable. Such an objective analysis means that a quantification of both gains in efficiency and anticompetitive effects must be carried out whenever it is reasonably possible to do so.

The methodology adopted by the FCA provides more certainty than that applied by the Tribunal, which adopted a "subjective balancing" approach that gave weight to (a) the qualitative effects of the merger, and (b) quantitative effects that have not been quantified, but can be given qualitative weight. However, even under the FCA's more "objective" approach, it may still be difficult to predict how the efficiency defense will be applied in any given case. The FCA held that under its "objective" approach it was still appropriate to consider qualitative effects that cannot be quantified. It is unclear how the Tribunal (and parties contemplating a transaction) can objectively balance unquantifiable qualitative impacts on competition against qualitative efficiency gains.

Additionally, although the FCA emphasized the importance of an objective weighing of quantifiable efficiency gains against anticompetitive effects, it was not able to actually engage in this weighing exercise as the Commissioner had not quantified the anticompetitive effects from the transaction. Rather, the FCA found that the gains were "negligible" (amounting to less than the "yearly remuneration of a half-time junior employee") and therefore these gains could not "offset" the anticompetitive effects. In essence, the FCA was not prepared to allow such marginal efficiency gains (which it recognized might not even be merger-specific) to justify preserving a pre-existing monopoly.


The FCA's decision provides additional guidance on the appropriate methodologies for assessing whether a merger results in a substantial prevention of competition and the application of the efficiencies defense. Specifically:

  • In cases involving an alleged prevention of competition the Tribunal must determine, among other things, whether the new entry or increased competition that is alleged by the Commissioner to be prevented would occur within a "reasonable period of time". A "reasonable period of time" must be discernible and, generally speaking, should be a shorter period of time than that required for a new entrant to enter into the market.

  • When assessing whether efficiency gains are greater than and offset the anticompetitive effects of a merger, the analysis must be as objective as is reasonably possible.

  • Under this "objective" approach of analyzing efficiencies it is still appropriate to consider qualitative factors that cannot be quantified.

However, some questions still remain and an assessment of the possible application of the efficiencies defense will require a detailed case specific analysis.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions