Canada: Expert Determination

A recent judgment of the B.C. Supreme Court (the Court) in Haisla Nation v. Bear Creek Contracting Ltd. illustrates the importance of clearly distinguishing between expert determination and arbitration in commercial agreements.

Expert determination clauses are found in many agreements and are generally meant to provide a relatively simple way of resolving discrete technical, accounting or scientific matters. The matters covered by expert determination clauses vary among different industries and commercial relationships. While expert determination can be an efficient means of resolving certain discrete technical issues by an independent decision-maker, it is not the same as the arbitration of a dispute.

The legal effect of expert determination and the process that it entails is significantly different than the legal effect and the process of international or domestic arbitration of a contractual dispute. Arbitration generally involves a more formal process in which an independent decision-maker undertakes more of a judicial function involving findings of law and fact. A typical arbitration provision is meant to apply to all legal and factual disputes arising from a contractual relationship and not simply a discrete technical matter.

Arbitration Clause or Expert Determination Clause?

Courts have struggled with distinguishing between expert determination and arbitration provisions. The leading cases have been applied in such a way in Canada that, when the characterization of a provision is in dispute, it is often difficult to predict whether a court will conclude that the provision is of one type or the other. For example, compare the decisions in Ivaco Inc. v. III Canada Acquisition Co. and Hanzek v. TRM (Canada) Corporation.

This unpredictability is a concern because such a conclusion is far from inconsequential. International and domestic commercial arbitration in Canada must proceed in accordance with the applicable domestic or international commercial arbitration legislation including any mandatory procedural rules. An expert determination is not governed by such legislation. Further, the availability of judicial review is quite different in the context of expert determination and in the context of arbitration. Judicial review of arbitral awards is essentially statute based while judicial review of expert determinations is governed by the common law. The scope of judicial review of an expert determination in Canada has been considered in a limited number of cases. This subject has received relatively more attention in other common law jurisdictions. Generally, the law in Canada is that the decision of an expert may be set aside where the expert departed materially from its instructions or where the expert was biased.

Lord Denning MR, in a leading common law decision in Campbell v. Edwards regarding expert determination, outlined the following principles:

"It is simply the law of contract. If two persons agree that the price of property should be fixed by [an expert] on whom they agree, and he gives that valuation honestly and in good faith, they are bound by it. Even if he has made a mistake they are still bound by it. The reason is because they have agreed to be bound by it. [emphasis in original] If there were fraud or collusion, of course, it would be very different. Fraud or collusion unravels everything."

To the extent that judicial review of expert determinations has been considered in Canada, these principles appear to be in accordance with the current law in Canada. As a corollary to the limited circumstances under which a court may set aside the decision of an expert, experts may be sued for negligence. In contrast, arbitrators are for the most part immune from civil liability.

Perhaps most significantly, a determination of an issue by an arbitrator is enforceable in its own right in most jurisdictions around the world whereas an expert determination merely creates contractual rights which can only be enforced through a further proceeding for breach of contract in the appropriate court with jurisdiction over the contractual dispute.

Haisla Nation v. Bear Creek Contracting Ltd.

Haisla Nation serves as an example of a decision where a court considered whether under a provision in an agreement the parties to the agreement contracted to submit an issue to an expert or to arbitration. In Haisla Nation, the defendant, Bear Creek Contracting Ltd. (Bear Creek), applied for an order that the proceedings commenced by the claimant, The Haisla Nation (Haisla), be stayed pursuant to s. 15 of B.C.'s Commercial Arbitration Act. Haisla and Bear Creek disagreed about the appropriateness of certain deductions made by Bear Creek from the profits of the parties' partnership.

Bear Creek took the position that the core of the action was a dispute concerning the correctness of certain audited financial statements and that the parties agreed to arbitrate such a dispute under s. 7.03 of the parties' agreement. Under s. 7.03, any dispute between the parties with respect to any financial calculations or determinations to be made under the agreement was to be submitted to the accountants of the parties' partnership. The decision of the accountants was to be final and binding on the parties except in the case of a manifest error. Haisla took the position that s. 7.03 was not an arbitration clause governing the dispute raised in the action. According to Haisla, the role of the accountants under s. 7.03 was to verify the accuracy of calculations or determinations while the issue in the action was whether Bear Creek was entitled to payment of the disputed deductions and a share of the profits under the parties' agreement.

In its analysis, the B.C. Supreme Court considered the four indicia of arbitration set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Sport Maska Inc. v. Zittrer:

  1. there is a dispute or a difference between the parties which has been formulated in some way or another;
  2. the dispute or difference has been remitted by the parties to the person to resolve in such a manner that he is called on to exercise a judicial function;
  3. where appropriate, the parties must have been provided with an opportunity to present evidence and/or submissions in support of their respective claims in the dispute; and
  4. the parties have agreed to accept his decision.

In applying these indicia to the agreement between Bear Creek and Haisla, the Court held with respect to the first indicia that there was indeed a dispute between the parties as to the net income or profit of the parties' partnership. When considering the second and third indicia, the court examined the nature of the dispute and the involvement of the accountants more closely. The court concluded that the disagreement between the parties did not fall within the scope of s. 7.03. However, the court still considered whether s. 7.03 required the parties to submit to arbitration disputes within the scope of this section. The court noted as relevant that the parties did not explicitly agree to arbitration and that there was nothing in s. 7.03 which implied that the accountants were to exercise a "judicial function". The court emphasized that s. 7.03 did not contemplate the accountants receiving submissions from the parties. Ultimately, the court found that the second and third indicia of arbitration were absent. The court concluded that s. 7.03 was not an agreement by the parties to submit the kind of dispute raised in the action to the accountants for binding arbitration. Accordingly, Bear Creek's application to stay the proceedings was dismissed.

Careful Drafting of Dispute Resolution Clauses

Haisla Nation highlights the importance of careful drafting of dispute resolution provisions including expert determination and arbitration clauses. If the court in Haisla Nation concluded that the parties' dispute was within the scope of an arbitration provision agreed to by the parties, the court would have stayed the claimant's court proceedings. The claimant would have been required to pursue all legal and factual disputes by way of arbitration before the named accountants and subject to the Commercial Arbitration Act. Expert determination and arbitration clauses trigger significantly different processes and have significantly different legal effects. When drafting an expert determination or an arbitration provision, it is helpful to review Sport Maska Inc. and its application in cases such as Haisla Nation to provide as much certainty as possible to the parties who will be subject to the provision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
27 Oct 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Please join members of the Blakes Commercial Real Estate group as they discuss five key provisions of a commercial real estate purchase agreement that are often the subject of much negotiation but are sometimes misunderstood.

1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.