Canada: Conflicting Results From Ontario Appellate Courts In Motions To Strike Claims In Proposed Class Actions

Ontario’s appellate courts have released two decisions in the past week addressing the issue of when claims ought to be struck in the context of proposed class proceedings for failing to disclose a cause of action. First, a panel of the Divisional Court upheld the decision of Justice Horkins in Martin v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Plc, refusing to certify a proposed class on the grounds that the pleading was found to be “seriously deficient.” Only days later, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned the lower court decision in Kang v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada striking various claims in a proposed class action against Sun Life. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on the grounds that these claims were not “doomed to fail” and therefore should not have been struck at first instance.

Although both decisions apply the “plain and obvious” test, and reaffirm the threshold that defendants must meet in order to strike claims pursuant to Rule 21.01(1)(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure or defeat certification pursuant to section 5(1)(a) of the Class Proceedings Act, the apparent conflict manifest in the two rulings suggests that the pleadings requirements for putative class proceedings in Ontario remains unsettled.

Martin v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals

In Martin v. Astrazenca Pharmaceuticals Plc, the plaintiffs alleged that an antipsychotic medication approved by Health Canada to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder caused a variety of “serious and sometimes fatal” health risks, including diabetes. The plaintiffs also claimed that the defendant marketed the medication for “off label” uses unapproved by Health Canada, negligently failed to warn physicians and patients about the health risks, and conspired to conceal these risks. 

In refusing to certify the proposed class proceeding, Horkins J. of the Superior Court of Justice found that the plaintiffs had failed to satisfy section 5(1)(a) of the Class Proceedings Act, which requires that the pleading disclose a cause of action. In so doing, Horkins J. applied the accepted “plain and obvious” test, whereby a pleading will be deemed adequate for the purposes of section 5(1)(a) unless the claim has a radical defect or it is plain and obvious that it cannot succeed.

On its face, Justice Horkins’ decision set an exceptionally high bar for certification with regard to the level of specificity and clarity required of a plaintiff’s pleading at the certification stage. In particular, notwithstanding five separate pleadings amendments to the Statement of Claim and the provision of additional information to the defendants in response to demands for particulars, Horkins J. found that the pleading offended “the most basic rules governing pleadings,” and lacked the material facts necessary to establish viable causes of action in negligence, failure to warn, conspiracy, and waiver of tort.   

Notably, Justice Horkins went on to consider the remaining four prongs of the five-part certification test contained in section 5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act, and found that the plaintiffs had failed to satisfy each of the remaining four prongs. In so ruling, Justice Horkins acknowledged the fact that a very similar action had been certified in 2007 by Justice Cullity in Heward v. Eli Lilly & Co., on the basis of a very similar pleading, noting that the plaintiffs “borrowed” much of their pleading – including the common issues – from the Heward claim. Nevertheless, Justice Horkins concluded that these parallels between the proceedings were not sufficient to save the pleading before her, and denied certification accordingly.

The Divisional Court panel, composed of Justices Aston, Lederer and Herman, dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal.  The reasons of the Court, which were delivered orally by Aston J.1, affirmed the decision of the Superior Court of Justice and awarded $725,000 in costs to the defendants, marking a rare instance in which a Canadian appellate court has denied outright the certification of a pharmaceutical class action.

Kang v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

In the second case, however, the Court of Appeal reinstated claims that had been struck because they were not doomed to fail. In Kang v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 2013 ONCA 118, the plaintiffs alleged that Sun Life’s predecessor made misrepresentations when it sold them universal life insurance policies. Sun Life brought a motion to strike certain claims in advance of the certification motion. Perell J. granted the motion and struck the plaintiffs’ claims for breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, and deceit and fraud. The Court of Appeal granted the appeal and reinstated these struck claims.

The Court of Appeal held that a pleading should only be struck on a Rule 21 motion when the applicable law is settled. As a result, because the law on the duty of good faith and fair dealing in the insurance context did not appear to be settled, the claim ought not to have been struck. Similarly, because the terms of the contract appeared ambiguous, the claim for breach of contract ought not to have been struck. Finally, the Court held that claims of deceit and fraud based on the administration of policies differed from claims of negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation and ought not to have been struck because they too were not doomed to fail.

The Court of Appeal, however, upheld Perell J.’s decision to strike a claim related to releases signed by certain policyholders because the plaintiffs failed to request any specific relief in relation to the releases. As a result, the statements were struck, but the Court left open the availability of a motion to add a claim for rescission or declaratory relief on the releases.


Although the decisions rely on the same legal test, the differing approaches by the Divisional Court in Martin v. Astrazeneca and the Court of Appeal in Kang v. Sun Life suggest that the pleadings threshold in the context of class proceedings remains unsettled. The Martin decision, which stands in stark contrast to the 2007 Heward decision of Justice Cullity (a decision that was upheld on appeal by the Divisional Court), would seem to suggest that the Ontario courts are imposing more rigorous pleadings standards in the context of proposed class proceedings. Conversely, the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Kang suggests that the Ontario courts’ traditionally expansive application of the “plain and obvious” test remains intact.

Differing factors and considerations were at play in the respective decisions, such that they cannot be said to be in conflict with one another. Nevertheless, the resulting uncertainty surrounding the ability to strike tenuous claims at the pleadings stage will continue to impact the management and costs of defending class actions.


1 The written transcription of the reasons has yet to be released by the Court. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions