Canada: Americans Living Abroad Face Double Taxation In 2013

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) included new section 1411, which imposes a 3.8 percent tax on net investment income (NII) on U.S. citizens and residents. This article analyzes whether the foreign tax credit or the U.S. model treaty reduces the effect of this tax and concludes that they likely do not.

Foreign Tax Credit

The FTC is granted under section 27, which states: ‘‘The amount of taxes imposed by foreign countries and possessions of the United States shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter to the extent provided in section 901.’’ The words ‘‘this chapter’’ refer to chapter 1 of the code, which spans sections 1 through 1400U. Section 1411 appears in new chapter 2a of the code. On its face then, it seems that foreign taxes paid on NII may not reduce the tax imposed by section 1411, potentially resulting in double taxation on that income.

The IRS appears to agree with this analysis. On January 18 Tax Notes Today reported that an IRS official, speaking at an American Institute of Certified Public Accountants webcast, concluded that the NII tax is not creditable.1

That result is surprising. It is a long-standing American policy to eliminate double taxation through an FTC regime. A comprehensive tax treaty network with 66 countries enshrines that policy and makes it reciprocal. The section 1411 tax closely resembles the sort of taxes to which that treaty network applies. Even the proposed Treasury regulations unveiled last December generally impose the ordinary chapter 1 principles and rules in determining the tax under section 1411. To change that policy with nary a word in the legislative history is hard to believe (although Congress does have a history of inadvertently stepping on treaty obligations). We now turn to the U.S. model treaty to see how treaties would generally apply to section 1411.

U.S. Model Treaty

A principal purpose of the U.S. model treaty is to eliminate double taxation as much as possible. Although many treaty benefits are denied to U.S. citizens under the saving clause of article 1(4), relief from double taxation under article 23 is not one of them. The model states in article 23(1) that ‘‘in accordance with the provisions and subject to the limitations of the law of the United States (as it may be amended from time to time without changing the general principle hereof), the United States shall allow to a resident or citizen of the United States as a credit against the United States tax on income applicable to residents and citizens’’ certain taxes paid to a foreign country. It is unclear whether the NII tax is an amendment to U.S. law that avoids ‘‘changing the general principle’’ of article 23(1). An additional area of uncertainty is whether the section 1411 tax qualifies as an income tax under the model’s definition. Article 2(1) provides that the treaty applies ‘‘to taxes on income . . . irrespective of the manner in which they are levied.’’ Article 3(b) provides that the existing taxes to which the treaty applies includes ‘‘the Federal income taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (but excluding social security and unemployment taxes).’’ The specific exclusion of Social Security and unemployment taxes suggests that other unnamed income taxes should be included as taxes covered by the treaty.

There is a rich case law concerning which foreign taxes may qualify for an FTC. (It will soon be evenricher, when the Supreme Court decides PPL Corp. v. Commissioner.2) Perhaps these cases will clarifythe meaning of income tax under article 2 of thetreaty. If the same standards that have been appliedto foreign taxes were applied to the NII, a courtwould almost surely find that the NII tax is anincome tax and therefore covered by the treaty.

But determining that the treaty provides a different result than the code is problematic. The United States is unique in not recognizing the primacy of treaties over domestic law. Although the later-in-time rule ostensibly means that the PPACA supersedes existing treaties, the courts are loath to repeal a treaty provision by virtue of implication.3 Rather, the courts first attempt to harmonize the apparent conflict. Given the lack of discussion of the PPACA’s treaty effects in its legislative history or the text of the bill, repeal by implication is the only argument for overriding existing treaties. It would seem that courts faced with choosing between repeal by implication or harmonizing a treaty and statute would strongly favour harmonization (even if that harmonization was necessarily clumsy).

How might harmonization be accomplished? One avenue would be to simply hold that the NII tax in not an income tax under article 2. That may not be the best reading of article 2, but it is better than going down the route of repeal by implication.

However, courts do not interpret model treaties; they interpret actual treaties. Because treaties are individually negotiated, the texts of tax treaties vary considerably. Consider the oldest tax treaty in the U.S. tax treaty network: the income tax treaty enacted with Greece in 1950. Article 1 of that treaty is simple in its drafting:

1. the taxes which are the subject of the present Convention are:

a. in the case of the United States of America: the Federal income tax, including surtaxes (hereinafter referred to as United States tax).

2. the present Convention shall apply to any other taxes of a substantially similar character imposed by either Contracting State subsequently to the date of signature of the present Convention.

There are two reasons the Greek treaty is problematic for a harmonization argument. One is that the broadly written language encompasses income taxes and surtaxes. Moreover, unlike later treaties, the language of article 23(1) of the U.S. model limiting the FTC to the provisions and limitations of U.S. law (even as later amended) doesn’t appear in the Greek treaty.

The second reason is that the Greek treaty was enacted in 1950. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 expressly proclaimed that it did not apply when in conflict with any treaty in existence at the time of its enactment.4 The FTC-granting language of sections 27 and 901 was first enacted in the 1954 code (as sections 33 and 901).5 Arguably, to the extent the 1954 code limited the scope of article 1 of the Greek treaty, the 1954 code didn’t apply. Further, the Technical Corrections Act of 1988 provided that the 1986 tax reform was not to override existing treaties by implication. It would thus be difficult for a court to find that the NII tax is not an income tax or surtax under the Greek treaty or to find that either sections 27 or 901 limits the FTC, contrary to the Greek treaty. And that is promising news for Americans resident in Greece.


For the rest of the expatriate American population, however, the prudent course is to gird for foreign taxes not being creditable against the NII tax. Because tax is typically not withheld at the source on investment income, U.S. persons living abroad may need to make quarterly estimated tax payments.


1Shamik Trivedi, ‘‘Foreign Tax Credits Cannot Offset Net Investment Income, IRS Official Says’’ (Jan. 18, 2013), Doc2013-1255, 2013 TNT 13-2.

2Sup. Ct. Dkt. No. 12-43, 665 F.3d 60 (3d Cir. 2011), Doc 2011-26933, 2011 TNT 247-6.

3See, e.g., Posadas v. National City Bank, 296 U.S. 497, 503 (1936).

4That provision now appears in section 7852(d)(2).

5An FTC was provided in section 131 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, but it did not have any sort of ‘‘by this chapter’’ limiting language.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Dec 2018, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

On Dec. 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the biggest US tax reform bill in 31 years, changing the lives of Americans at home and abroad.

5 Dec 2018, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

This technical session will be of interest to advisors to private businesses (accountants, lawyers, investment and insurance advisors, bankers, trust officers and others) and business owners

6 Dec 2018, Webinar, Calgary, Canada

This 90-minute session will review last-minute planning for owner-managers and their advisors to consider before January 1, 2019.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions